Rousseau

Am I ... Philippe?

He was very poor: his crossing was awful.

No worse than those calling for a taxi for... *checks notes* ... every player on our books.

I love Lammers. I'd build the team around him.

I'd put Lammers where Dessers is, and bring on Danilo.

Our xG was 1.95 for that half. Mainly through the penalty and the Dessers "shot".

He was involved in three goals against Hibs last week.

That didn't last long! You're worse than me.

But true.

I'd like to see McCausland get some minutes, but I suspect - in this system - he's competing with both Cantwell and Wright for the same position. Unless Cantwell plays in one of the deeper positions taken by Lundstram and Raskin.

A disgrace. He probably had to change them.

I would accept that.

First half? 13 to our 1. Overall 16 to our 12. Both sides had 4 shots on target.

As was I.

I never wanted Dessers in the first place (£5M for a 28-year-old is stupidity), but I'm not going to criticise him when he's here, same with Lammers. Use them properly; use them to their strengths. Dessers is a penalty box striker. Give him chances in the box; he'll put them away. Don't expect him to run the channels and press. Lammers is a pressing forward, with good control, vision and positioning. Put him up-front - width of the goals - with someone to both feed and feed off.

Their xG was 0.85 in the first half. You could expect a goal coming from that, but not 3 or 4.

I don't mind having Souness around as an ambassador. But as a football consultant? No. He's a dinosaur. He's actually a dinosaur in punditry, never mind actual footballing matters.

What are your thoughts, folks?

Rangers 2 - 0 Hearts FGS Sima

Rangers vs Hearts

Very few points, but annoyingly, the top six or seven players extend their lead... Correct Result (1 pt): SBG, compo, BD, Franc, Yorkie, 26th, Ian, Ted, CammyF and T-1000. Correct Number of Rangers Goals (1pt): - FGS (2 pts): - Correct Score (3 pts): - Latest Standings:

Cantwell was booked, too.

I'll take that. Solid result.

The xG is 0.85 to 0.02. Lol.

Well—that was one-sided. Relatively even in terms of possession, but they did much more with the ball (13 shots to 1).