Jump to content

 

 

Rousseau

  • Posts

    20,986
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    221

Everything posted by Rousseau

  1. If you look, I mentioned 'Lam Sammers'...
  2. Hopefully we can get some forward options back fit over the break. That way we won't rue not signing a striker - someone like that lad that's banging them in for FC Utrecht; Lam Sammers, I think he's called...
  3. Pretty level, to be fair. Defensively, Barisic shades it - except for interceptions and pressing. Offensively, Ridvan shades it - except for the important assist number. It really highlights how they differ in style: Barisic is better defensively deep (low block) , passes and assists; Ridvan is better defensively higher up the pitch (high press) , and dribbling and shooting. You can see why PC might prefer Ridvan.
  4. Ridvan's xA (the quality of the assist - similar to xG) is higher so, no. The forwards have just taken the chance. It's the same with goals: miss a tap-in, score a worldie from 40-yards. It's a dilemma. It'll be interesting to see what PC does.
  5. 0.25 to 0.22 xA per 90, with Barisic shading it.
  6. It says above that Barisic has 3 assists to Ridvan's 1. (I was just pointing out the xA from Ridvan is pretty good - he can't score the goals for them). The stats would agree there's not much between them - if we ignore the style difference. That's fair. The criticism of Barisic can be over the top. I personally prefer Ridvan: the fact that the stats show he's in-line with Barisic - if I'm being harsh - at only 22 years old, suggests to me he must be first choice. (I'd revise that if we sign someone else.)
  7. Stats: Ridvan is better in the creativity department (even if his chances created have not been taken - 3.5 xA!). Barisic is better defensively - although Ridvan is a better front-foot defender (possession won in final third and interception). The biggest difference is the 10 years between them! That alone suggests Ridvan should be the priority - IMO.
  8. Benfica drew Marseille.
  9. I've been arguing for a set-piece coach for ages - and a throw-in coach.
  10. PC did the same with Cantwell - he even hooked him at half-time.
  11. Dundee 0 - 1 Rangers FGS Tavernier
  12. What are your thoughts, folks?
  13. ... Correct Result (1 pt): Bill, Dado, Devil, compo and Lenny. Correct Number of Rangers Goals (1pt): - FGS (2 pts): - Correct Score (3 pts): - Latest Standings:
  14. At least the Prague side is getting pumped.
  15. I don't think we need to give Benfica any credit. They are a good side but they are currently going through a bad spell. If we have our full complement of players we could have beaten them. Alas! We didn't have a full team. We played well for the most part. I felt we just lacked quality in the final third. I think Sima, Cortes and Danilo make a difference. I do think it has been another good European campaign, though: to get out of the group is a superb achievement.
  16. The Europa League is p*sh anyway...
  17. Both sides are level on shots, yet they've got 1.54 xG compared to our 0.40 xG. We just don't have the quality in the final third.
  18. Injury incoming?
  19. Rangers 1 - 0 Benfica FGS Tavernier
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.