Jump to content

 

 

quattro

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    69

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by quattro

  1. quattro
    Lot of ifs buts and maybe in there, I am sure you know the difference between a rights and an open, however not worth the time as Res 8 was voted down by as I said RF and the RST among others. Facts will do best in the meantime, Ashley is driving the bus so to speak, when we arrive at his chosen destination he will let all know. I enjoyed Mr Houston's well written and cogent piece, how about you.
  2. quattro
    I note that Mr Houston of SoS concurs with your reservations (you should read his contribution very well thought out), always good to see some approach from the angle of truth rather than wishful thinking, there would be less beeling people in the world
  3. quattro
    Bill has really set a few people on the back foot, after all what has changed except the names on share certs, Laxey via Kingsnorth have all but admitted they were powerless against Ashley, even with 16% shareholding. What will the new share holders be able to enforce against Ashley that the Laxey camp failed to. There will be no share issue it will be a rights issue if any at all, the share issue was voted down by RF and RST amongst others. When Ashley decides good or bad we will know. Haven't seen good buddy RangersRab about, surely not another enforced holiday.
  4. quattro
    Good fairies only appear in pantomimes, whereas in the real world. The Rangers Football Club Ltd (TRFCL) has reported an £18.19 million pre-tax loss for the 13 months to June 30, 2013. The company, with operates “a professional football club in Scotland, together with related commercial activities”, reports it owes parent company Rangers International Football Club Plc (RIFC), £16.16 million. TRIFC notes the amounts owed to Rangers International “are unsecured, repayable on demand and do not accrue interest".
  5. quattro
    They will be considering the £16 million owed to the PLC on top of Ashley's £3 million.
  6. quattro
    I would say you certainly are, and with forthcoming good cause.
  7. quattro
    Chip wrapper one expert here dismissed it as. I would put money on Dave's contribution being at least doubled he did after all admit to his crimes, with jail time thrown in, always darkest before the door slams shut to reveal your new SA cell kapo. "Billionaire businessman Dave King is the most prominent among high-profile South Africans who could be slapped with far higher tax bills if their deals with the taxman are reviewed. The findings of the investigation, carried out by a panel headed by Johannesburg advocate Muzi Sikhakhane, largely confirm reports by the Sunday Times over the past few months - and vociferously denied by SARS at the time - that the rogue unit engaged in a wide array of illegal tactics. It found "prima facie evidence" that SARS operated a covert unit that illegally spied on the taxpayers it was investigating, including some it had cut deals with. The result is that all deals reached in the past 10 years could be up for review, with potentially damaging consequences for SARS, long regarded as one of the government's "cleanest" and most effective agencies". http://www.timeslive.co.za/local/2014/12/21/tax-u-turns-on-cards-after-probe-into-sars-rogue-unit
  8. quattro
    I always enjoy reading the Newcastle boards articles who do like to post up the relevant regulations to further their opinions, no doubt the telegraph whom Ashley's people constantly give a bloody nose to will be along shortly with their anti Ashley take on matters. http://www.nufcblog.com/2014/11/29/uefa-rules-how-rangers-newcastle-can-compete-in-europe/
  9. quattro
    Obviously many do not understand the structure of UEFA or its clear ruling on dual ownership, which of course the SFA are in direct breach of, as I recall the SFA were also warned of serious sanctions by FIFA/UEFA over the outcome of the transfer embargo affair.
  10. quattro
    Why would Ashley take on UEFA, he isn't breaching any UEFA articles the SFA are.
  11. quattro
    No, as they will undoubtedly find out when court papers are served.
  12. quattro
    McCoist will be telling us he worked months for nothing next. Wonder how it will be received when he votes with the board on Monday.
  13. quattro
    Play it down ? you couldn't give it away, a relic of Advocaat and murray's vanity.
  14. quattro
    Whatever happened to your promulgations, swept away on a floodplain ?
  15. quattro
    The part of Ibrox you don't see the roof, is said to have major issues however as yet not serious enough to involve building control or any other authoritative body. However left unrepaired it is only a matter of time until things degenerate to a dangerous level.
  16. quattro
    Issue 8.10 – Flood Risk - East Dunbartonshire Council will tell you all you need to know, and very rough projected costs to alleviate the risks of flooding, at considerable and quite possibly beyond viable cost.
  17. quattro
    Not since the the law was changed, insurance companies will not insure domestic dwellings on known floodplains and the government won't compensate anyone who builds on a known floodplain.
  18. quattro
    It is on a designated floodplain, Noah might be interested in it.
  19. quattro
    Who would buy MP it is of little use to anyone other than as grazing land or a training centre.
  20. quattro
    McCoist's contract is up for renewal on 15/06/2015, hopefully that situation is rectified on Wednesday by an announcement about a new manager, least said about Friday's game the better also the farce before and after.
  21. quattro
    Everything flows from Ticketus and at least two others, which coming events will make a lot clearer.
  22. quattro
    The problem for the Scottish criminal action is that a Law Lord has already ruled that Ticketus under Scots Law bought no tickets, how the PF's office get around that one is something of wonderment, whereas the civil action will be as usual on probability which will also be a problem for Ticketus I.E what led them to believe that the tickets were Whyte's to sell, taking into consideration that they had previously done business with SDM's regime.
  23. quattro
    Apparently the adjournment is to allow the completion of inquiries, as to the knowledge of Ticketus and at least two others with regard to the contracts and agreements with Whyte in this action. Some think the Crown Office in Scotland were precipitous in the issuing of warrants, whilst not being in possession of all the evidence, which the English court has adjourned to be presented with. The smart money is on Ticketus's action being thrown out, not without further ramifications for some involved parties it must be said.
  24. quattro
    It does appear McCoist is safe for the moment, an alleged decision that is quite unfathomable. http://m.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/30334338
  25. quattro
    Having spoken to a couple of people this morning it would appear the status quo will see no immediate change, I personally doubt that doing nothing is an option we can afford.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.