stewarty

I don't think we can blame any senior player for moving on. Not least a player who was only under contract to us until the end of the season, one who paid some of his own cash in order to gain his short term move to our club and who also accepted a wage reduction in the final part of the season.

Frankie has hit the nail on the head in his last post above. How can any of our actual/alleged wrong doings be punished until we know the full extent of them, and have established all facts so that guilt can be assigned accurately? This is indeed, a joke.

Said earlier today that the title stripping stories were placed to force our hand with regards to accepting the transfer embargo.

Agreed. Although I would say we are a joke, rather than becoming one.

Interesting tactic though from the SFL. In effect, this puts pressure on the SFA to grant membership.

Completely different context now though. Its open warfare.

On the face of it, this guy seems to be on the level. Fair do's. Next?

But Al-Jazeera are going to show the games, no?

If Green wants Bomber to go away, just sit down and show him what he wants. If Bomber doesn't believe Green is any good, then get your bid together and make him an offer he can't refuse. Seems to me this should have been resolved a couple of weeks ago.

I've said it before but our crime is to have incorrectly administered a legally acceptable tax reduction vehicle. What justification is there for such a sustained and disproportionate witch hunt? Each passing hour I am becoming more and more aligned to Giovanni de Stefano's way of thinking.

The more high profile backers he gets, the more convincing his argument becomes, no matter how flawed Bomber's public utterances are.

A few questions: 1) How much has he invested? 2) What is his motivation? 3) For what time period is he investing? 4) What return does he expect? 5) What involvement will he have in the club's operations? That'll do for starters.

He's behind you!

Whether he is as mad as a box of frogs or not, I'd be very interested in this information being tested in the Court of Session.

One question: is this legal?

Between no12 and Calscot's post, there is a good post for TRS to contrast with those already there.

Whether Bomber is the man to take us forward long term i dont know, but if he is a catalyst that sees the club owned and run by the fans/ bona fide rangers men, then I'm prepared to give him a chance. We should wait and see how this next bid plays out in my view.

Langmuir has primarily attempted to deal with an impossible position that is not of own making. I think it is a bit rich to be calling for his head at this juncture. Regan on the other hand...

I always know Gribz has been on the sauce when I wake up to a dozen Facebook notifications of Gribz ramblings. Btw, Gribz- get that yahoo Scott tar feck!

They have really bricked it, haven't they. All I can think to do is laugh at their idiocy.

The responses validate the article. Good work, Chris!

We need much more of this kind of stuff. It exposes the agendas for what they are.

Agreed. But its because of Whyte that we have such grave mistrust of everyone. And when you have made such glaringly obvious mistakes such as Green has, its only natural that this is heightened.

Sorry Charles but its your own actions and words that have garnered this mistrust. You make statements, then there is evidence around which suggests that either you haven't listened to our concerns, are ignoring them, or are wilfully pursuing a strategy that we are not comfortable with. This could all be cleared up if you answered each and every one of our concerns with solid and verifiable evidence. Simples.

I'd wager there are many unnofficial connections between Lawwell, Regan and various bloggers. Its been hinted at by many folk and this would certainly blow it out the water. But as Andy says, I wont count any chickens on it.