Jump to content

 

 

Rangersitis

  • Posts

    3,601
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Rangersitis

  1. Not at all, but feel free to point out anything I have posted which would suggest that to be the case.
  2. You previously stated, in this very thread, that it was well into the millions. What is it to be?
  3. I can't say what the future will bring. My main concern about King is his plans to spend millions to compete with Celtic. That is not a sustainable way forward. In saying that, it would be better than the current mob.
  4. Specifically, what was the rumour you were told about?
  5. Eh, why not lose the excessive salaries instead of the stadium where matches are played?
  6. So you would jettison the youth development department altogether?
  7. It may have been better to have considered that prior to posting what you did. If it isn't a site which is much sought after, it won't make enough money to cover the costs of finding another ground to play in.
  8. You have already told us that it is well into the millions. It is used as a training and medical centre for all players, not just the first team squad.
  9. Who would want to buy Ibrox? It is of little use to anyone other than as a stadium.
  10. Closing down Murray Park would be sheer lunacy.
  11. When the guy who is sitting on a pile of cash is being touted as the next saviour, anything is considered acceptable to some. You couldn't make it up.
  12. The 'unbudgeted liability' that was revealed during the proceedings in the High Court appears to have largely gone under the radar. That could be for any amount.
  13. This whole Ashley love-in is following the exact same pattern as with Whyte and the Green consortium. One has to wonder who is pushing the agenda.....
  14. Are you not going to post any comments from that site which give the negatives about Mike Ashley and his time at Newcastle United? You never tire of telling everyone that you are a big supporter of debate, so why are you only providing one side of the story?
  15. Not unless the stuff was at the printers already, and even then I'm not sure of the minimum notice required.
  16. It was stated yesterday that the AGM would be held in September or October. They will need accounts prior to that, plus give the required notice of the meeting. All that for a board who seem to do everything as slow as a week in the jail.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.