

Rangersitis
-
Posts
3,601 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Rangersitis
-
Perhaps they were but feel underwhelmed by the 'revolution'?
-
A Covenant - a clear case for transparency
Rangersitis replied to D'Artagnan's topic in Rangers Chat
Wallace and Nash hadn't been planning for the amount of years that King has had. The youth and scouting set-up should have been planned and implementation should have begun on day one. They would have had a better insight into what was going than anyone else, yet the dogs on the street knew what was a priority. I agree that some things will take time to complete and that patience is needed, but other than a couple of emergency loans, all we have heard are vague assurances that money will be invested. -
A Covenant - a clear case for transparency
Rangersitis replied to D'Artagnan's topic in Rangers Chat
I have absolutely no defence to any charge of being negative and pessimistic about the continuing saga. I'm pissed off and have been for years now. When things eventually change for the good, so shall my mood. -
A Covenant - a clear case for transparency
Rangersitis replied to D'Artagnan's topic in Rangers Chat
The appointment of the new manager is a positive move, most definitely. The cull should have been far more severe as there are still players there who are nowhere near good enough. Other than that, the new board have done very little else since they arrived. Being 'not the old board' only has a limited shelf life, I'm afraid. -
A Covenant - a clear case for transparency
Rangersitis replied to D'Artagnan's topic in Rangers Chat
They are free to do whatever they want, but the hypocrisy of it all stinks to high heaven. -
A Covenant - a clear case for transparency
Rangersitis replied to D'Artagnan's topic in Rangers Chat
Quite easily. Those fan groups have helped to cause more damage to the club than the media could ever dream of accomplishing. -
A Covenant - a clear case for transparency
Rangersitis replied to D'Artagnan's topic in Rangers Chat
That's certainly not true. I know plenty of folk with a Rangers connection who are good people, even ones who I disagree with on certain matters. My gripe is with the groups who use Rangers and it's support as a means to further their own ambitions, plus the influential individuals who will use their standing to attack others for not adhering to those agendas. You are one of those individuals, McMurdo is another. -
A Covenant - a clear case for transparency
Rangersitis replied to D'Artagnan's topic in Rangers Chat
There isn't a lot to be positive about where Rangers are concerned and that has been the case for a number of years now. Should I just shut up and let lies become truths and allow history to be revised in order to save the blushes of others? If you wish to turn a blind eye to the agenda-driven behaviour of the RST, VB or SoS, batter on, but it comes across as very strange that a mod on a discussion forum would decry anyone for daring to state their position. As for me being anonymous, I have met people who use this board and if you would like me to provide you with my name, address and Rangers history just say so. -
A Covenant - a clear case for transparency
Rangersitis replied to D'Artagnan's topic in Rangers Chat
Just remembered that we've done this conversation on a previous thread, so little point in repeating things. -
You can have an opinion whenever you like. I was just intrigued as you said that Winks would be a great signing. You must spend some amount of time and money if you are watching Rangers, Hearts, Raith and the Spurs youth teams. Fair play to you.
-
A Covenant - a clear case for transparency
Rangersitis replied to D'Artagnan's topic in Rangers Chat
Which allowed the real enemies within Ibrox to do their worst. Far too much emphasis goes towards external nonsense. -
On how many occasions have you seen him play?
-
A Covenant - a clear case for transparency
Rangersitis replied to D'Artagnan's topic in Rangers Chat
The RST are aligned with the current board and were most vocal about the previous lot, that is except for McCoist. His exorbitant wage wasn't questioned in the same way as the likes of Green, Ahmad et al. His bung from Green of 1m shares was never used against him the way it was with others. Why? Because he was on the same side as them and it didn't suit the agenda that was being pushed. They are not the only group who have been happy to indulge in propaganda in the belief that their own missions would be achieved in the process. The support have never been as one, never, but the various self-interest groups that have been set up over the years have smashed any fissures into deep ravines. Sadly, the clock cannot be turned back. -
Sarver had no real intention to put his money into Rangers. He knew that his plans would be knocked back and never took the steps required to force the issue. Your opinion of Levante is comical. They play in the second biggest league in world football, but a wiser investment for Sarver's money would be to put it into a club currently in the second division of a footballing backwater.
-
West Brom fans not happy with James McLean signing
Rangersitis replied to ian1964's topic in General Football Chat
The scary thing is, he would generally be accepted at Ibrox. -
Dave King stands to get £1.4m out of £10m Rangers oldco creditors pot
Rangersitis replied to pete's topic in Rangers Chat
A four day hearing begins on July 7. -
Purple Rangers top confirmed as new 3rd strip
Rangersitis replied to Rangersitis's topic in Rangers Chat
Halmstads. -
Who needs Brain Training!
-
Purple Rangers top confirmed as new 3rd strip
Rangersitis replied to Rangersitis's topic in Rangers Chat
That's apparently the third strip, not the 'keeper's top! -
Fair enough.
-
Missed 7 months with a knee injury when at Coventry. Missed a whole season plus 4 months with a knee injury while at Stoke. Missed almost all of his last season at Watford with a back injury. Two knee operations at Derby last season.