Jump to content

 

 

Rangersitis

  • Posts

    3,601
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Rangersitis

  1. That would have been the case with or without Ashley.....unless you have information to the contrary.
  2. Of course, everyone can hold a personal view, but when those views are critical of the very people that elected them to where they are, then they should either be kept private, or, if made public, expect them to be publicised and challenged. None of this has anything to do with your personal thoughts, or mine for that matter, on Ashley, the UoF or attending matches, so let's not try to veer away from the matter at hand.
  3. I formed an opinion based on the comments made, and those previously made. I won't apologise for doing so. Belittling the actions of a group within the support is not what I would expect from a fan representative, whatever their personal position on the politics of it all. They are in position to promote those types of issues, obtain answers from the club and find solutions to the concerns of those they speak for.
  4. There was something mentioned in a newspaper article yesterday about market rules requiring an interview process to take place, so that might explain the charade.
  5. If Ashley has indeed bought the stadium naming rights, and there has been nothing proffered to refute the veracity of Sandy's words, then there may have been an agreement reached between the parties, but Nash couldn't have blocked anything.
  6. Hit the ignore function if you don't wish to see what I post. If you choose not to do so, try not to whine like a wee bitch when my remarks upset you.
  7. If true, and if he was serious about bidding, why has there not been a challenge to the decision of the board? Was it merely last minute desperation from King, made in the hope of gaining some more time?
  8. Nothing, as I don't think his offer was as strong as is being reported in the statements from SoS and UoF. If those making the bids don't have anything to say on their failure, the fan groups are pissing in the wind if they think they will have any great effect.
  9. I'm well aware of what the official attendance was given as, just as I am well aware of how that number is made up.
  10. What does Kennedy's bid and meek acceptance of it's failure have to do with Ashley and litigation? The board turned down his offer.
  11. There must have been under five figures in attendance tonight. Whatever the reasons for that, it shows that the attraction just isn't there anymore. What happened to 'The Journey'?
  12. Thanks. If he thought that they had been shafted, I would have expected a bit more than that bland release. Kennedy loves getting himself a mention and a bit of free publicity.
  13. On the subject of CL exposure..... Mastercard Sony Heineken Gazprom Nissan HTC UniCredit So, which one of the above do we think will be replaced by Sports Direct as a main sponsor?
  14. An SoS statement can't be relied upon to be accurate. Not a peep from King or Kennedy speaks volumes to me.
  15. The part of King's plan that was unclear was how he was going to achieve the conditions that he required for the deal to go through. Have the full details been given on Kennedy's alternative? Has he even made a statement?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.