

Rangersitis
-
Posts
3,601 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Rangersitis
-
If they are struggling with cashflow at the beginning of August, it doesn't augur well for the remainder of the season. Tick tock.
-
What is your idea of 'very little investment'?
-
That £5m is actually £2.5m once the 5m€ is converted to Sterling and the outstanding loans are repaid.
-
By doing it that way it will have been totally forgotten about by the time the voting takes place for the Fan Board.
- 54 replies
-
- rangers fans
- rangers
-
(and 8 more)
Tagged with:
-
Tut, tut, tut.
- 54 replies
-
- rangers fans
- rangers
-
(and 8 more)
Tagged with:
-
Where are the posters who claim that the Rangers 1972 Fund was a disaster? Starve the bastards out.
-
Daily Record football writers were stenographers for spin-doctors
Rangersitis replied to ian1964's topic in Rangers Chat
That is where it all became a bit sinister. -
Daily Record football writers were stenographers for spin-doctors
Rangersitis replied to ian1964's topic in Rangers Chat
I agree that they could have been more forceful in presenting the extent of their knowledge of Whyte's past, but it could be that they had to abide by certain rules. I also don't know if it would have made much difference to those who were loathe to see anyone connected to the Murray regime remain in control. -
Daily Record football writers were stenographers for spin-doctors
Rangersitis replied to ian1964's topic in Rangers Chat
While there is no doubt that the media were used to 'sell' Whyte in the early days, anything negative that was subsequently said about him was attacked by the great majority of the support. Those who refused to not only have an open mind but also tried to smear/silence those who were suspicious, have a lot more to answer for than any rag. -
Yep, hiding.
- 74 replies
-
- rangers fans
- rangers
- (and 15 more)
-
Don't they own the equipment? Scratch that. I think that was Close Brothers.
- 42 replies
-
- rangers fc
- rangers
- (and 5 more)
-
Don't you think that it's a bit late for that? Rangers have been involved in politics for more than one hundred years.
- 74 replies
-
- rangers fans
- rangers
- (and 15 more)
-
You don't even know if it is connected to what is going on in the Middle East, so until you do, it could be that you are the one bringing politics into sport. If you had called for a ban on all flags, then fair enough, but you're not. Should you not also be calling for the UJ be removed from Ibrox due to what is happening further East in Afghanistan?
- 74 replies
-
- rangers fans
- rangers
- (and 15 more)
-
Overseas means Millport, Dunoon and Rothesay.
-
Would it be too sceptical to suggest that the final twelve are already known?
-
I just thought that HMRC would be subject to certain rules with regard to a new company's tax affairs, regardless of who was behind it. If I am mistaken, then I apologise.
- 46 replies
-
- rangers fc
- rangers fans
- (and 17 more)
-
A warts and all autobiography by Jack Irvine would reveal more than a thousand Public Inquiries. He knows where ALL the skeletons are buried - from SDM through to the present day.
- 46 replies
-
- rangers fc
- rangers fans
- (and 17 more)
-
Whyte's personal tax woes, the BTC and the non-payment of tax and NI by Rangers are all separate. Only one man has anything to gain from an article which attempts to lump them all together.
- 46 replies
-
- rangers fc
- rangers fans
- (and 17 more)
-
Rangers fans can take various national flags to games thanks to a succession of men who fought to keep our little world free from tyranny. The reason they are doing it is both immaterial and none of your fucking business.
- 74 replies
-
- rangers fans
- rangers
- (and 15 more)
-
Duplicity abounds! Whodathunkit?!?!
-
Correct. It still wasn't a dual sponsorship deal.
-
Celtic announced a deal with Magners prior to Green securing anything.
-
Hoody would be struggling to keep up these days.
- 1,045 replies
-
- sponsorship
- smith
- (and 15 more)
-
Oh my! :D
-
Somers claimed to have never heard of Whyte, Green or Ahmad prior to joining the board. Lies. Even if giving him the benefit of the doubt, what would he be doing taking a position without garnering a brief bit of info on the firm? Green claimed to have only met Craig Whyte on one occasion. We know how that turned out.
- 26 replies