

buster.
-
Posts
14,135 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
110
Everything posted by buster.
-
Spare a thought for the work 'R1-0' puts into the predictor league....and he must have spent ages looking for a way of presenting a table that had him at the top. 😉😁
-
One of the best threads on here, ever IMO. 26th, you either inspired the team to a European Final or your timing is spookily good 😁
-
I don't know if I have ever heard Cosgrove in his Off the ball slot, to be so transparently bitter, contrived ('Barack Obama running a bus' involved) and desperate to push a customary narrative,......and that is saying something. After nineteen years, the batteries of the Suville calculator have finally run out. Yesterday, Cosgrove said the Suville calculator "...is dead, no-one cares about it anymore...". Apparently he is sick of over-exaggeration and it took 19 years until the threshold was reached, so he had to comment and call time on such a device. Obviously, he didn't send this memo to Jane Dougall and her line about 250,000 rioting in Manchester. They seem to want it both ways. For those who would like to hear exactly what was said (not compulsory and please don't bore the world with the repetitive 'why would anyone want to listen to that' line) it comes up at 1hr 44min 45sec into the link below) https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m0017l2q
-
gpl predictions (image) Bluebear54's GPL 2021/22: Rangers vs Hearts
buster. replied to Rousseau's topic in Rangers Chat
If thems the roolz, congrats ! 😁 -
gpl predictions (image) Bluebear54's GPL 2021/22: Rangers vs Hearts
buster. replied to Rousseau's topic in Rangers Chat
Yorkie wins with 3 more correct results, surely ! -
match thread (image) [AET] Rangers 2 (Jack 93'; Wright 97') - 0 Hearts
buster. replied to ian1964's topic in Rangers Chat
Convincing and strong performance. We move on....... -
match thread (image) [AET] Rangers 2 (Jack 93'; Wright 97') - 0 Hearts
buster. replied to ian1964's topic in Rangers Chat
Lowry to score and a 4-0 FT would do nicely. Sakala usually gets a late goal in the Scottish Cup. -
match thread (image) [AET] Rangers 2 (Jack 93'; Wright 97') - 0 Hearts
buster. replied to ian1964's topic in Rangers Chat
All Wright Jack !!? -
Rangers 3 Hearts 1 FGS: Derek Johnstone
-
Aye, but you mentioned other Bears. To give his insights, 26th has to listen to it.
-
You can't have it both ways.
-
Cowan's dig about throwing chairs was bad enough and badly received by Catriona Shearer but Cosgrove took it to a new level of trying to squeeze blood from a stone. I think all the usual suspects were so geared up to have a go at the Rangers support after Sevilla, that they couldn't properly digest and register the good behaviour and clean sheet of arrests, zero.
-
Cosgrove has just outdone himself trying to cast a slur on the Rangers support in Sevilla. The link below is the live feed. To listen to the slur scroll back to 1245 Catriona Shearer is the guest https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/live:bbc_radio_scotland_fm
-
I'd have thought Chelsea will either extend his contract or look to move him on this summer. Gilmour really needs to be playing regular first team football, so he might be happy to move on, if he can find the right club. 15M, not sure, but he wouldn't come cheap. If he were to go on loan, then yes, would be an excellent signing.
-
match thread (image) [AET] Rangers 2 (Jack 93'; Wright 97') - 0 Hearts
buster. replied to ian1964's topic in Rangers Chat
Won't be until somewhere between team lines and KO that I'll get up for this. A team featuring Alex Lowry would help me get there. 3-1 seems to be a popular score in the predictor. Back in 1976, Derek Johnstone scored from the preverbial Tommy McLean cross after 44 seconds, in a 3-1 victory. DJ was only 22 years old but a full six years prior to this, he had scored the winner in a national cup final. If you are good enough, you are old enough. Alex Lowry merits a start. -
Would that be Skullduggery ? 😁
-
I get the point you make but in the case of Ryan Jack, he has a contract and where would he pass a medical and be given a similar wage ? As far as I see it, if he is contributing positively, in say 50% of games, that is better value than paying him off. Come the end of his contract, there is obviously no extension. What bugs me is bringing players to the club who are heavily 'injury prone'. In the last window, we signed Souttar on a Bosman and Ramsey on loan. Ramsey has hardly contributed (I point the finger at our recruitment, not Ramsey). With Souttar, time will tell. But you can't reasonably expect or depend on him to stay fit for long periods and hence management of his ankles/hip will more likely follow. I'd expect better from what won't be a cheap recruitment set-up. They might argue that their hands have been tied by relatively small budgets and while that will obviously limit options, I don't think bringing in several players who have a bad injury record will ever give a net positive. For every Goldson, you get more who are out as much as they are in, eg. Roofe, Helander, A more general point is that after several poor transfer windows, our recruitment has to up it's game considerably this summer. You would imagine that Gio will be supported as he will need to begin a re-build. We need to get that right or a bumpy ride will follow.
-
match thread (image) Europa League Final 2022 - Official Match Thread
buster. replied to Gonzo79's topic in Rangers Chat
The European Conference League gives teams at our level an increased chance of winning something in Europe. Basically doubles the possibility. -
match thread (image) Europa League Final 2022 - Official Match Thread
buster. replied to Gonzo79's topic in Rangers Chat
Money gives you an opportunity to improve. If spent badly and/or kept in the biscuit tin it won't improve you on-field. You speak of 12 seasons. I count only four CLGS participations for them in that timeframe. None since 2018 and recently the money has increased. I think they have made more money (gross) from player trading. -
match thread (image) Europa League Final 2022 - Official Match Thread
buster. replied to Gonzo79's topic in Rangers Chat
The finance for meaningful progress required a win on Wednesday. For progress at this level you need better players. For better players you need more money. We have another opportunity to qualify for the CL in August. By no means impossible but I tend to think it will be asking a lot of a team with a few new faces. -
match thread (image) [AET] Rangers 2 (Jack 93'; Wright 97') - 0 Hearts
buster. replied to ian1964's topic in Rangers Chat
Barisic out No other injuries from the EL Final McLaughlin starts Sounds like Lowry will be on the bench -
We have contracted a player (John Souttar) with 93 league starts in the same timeframe.
-
Ryan Jack deserves a rest and a pre-season to see what he brings to the team next season. What we know he can bring (if fit) is hugely important to the team and we shouldn't contemplate giving that away until we have given him every chance to get fully up to speed.
-
Every year the lists of players (sometimes referred to as deadwood) is compiled and pre-released/sold on the messageboards. However, come the transfer window, it isn't always as easy. A similar uncertainty will affect our business, as it did last year. Champions League money......yes or no. It didn't do us any favours against Malmo. It could be argued that this had something to do with why SG didn't seem as fully engaged and happy at that time. ie....and I speculate here...... SG wanted to strengthen, Rangers board said 'wait, until the CL money is in the bag'. I doubt that we'll be able to spend it until/if we have it. If we were to get to the CLPO round, the second leg is on the 23rd or 24th of August and will give us a few days to a week to do further business with CL monies (if successful in qualifying). That said, if we buy well (not necessarily for loadsa money) and most hit the ground running, great. We really need some good recruitment over this summer or we might relatively struggle next season.
-
Not unless it was on a Bosman (don't know contract situation). Sheep would want too much for him. We'd be better spending the money in other markets where you can get more for your money (if you buy well).