Jump to content

 

 

buster.

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    14,371

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    111

Everything posted by buster.

  1. buster.
    I wonder why we don't believe a word that comes out of Ibrox ? This was called out for being cr@p at the time and it doesn't seem to have taken long for confirmation.
  2. buster.
    Zappa I don't think Patey appears to do anymore than have a skim through numbers and thereafter look to adopt a non-controversial, safe and general line in answering questions. It's representative of the way the mainstream have covered our omnishambles. The so-called expert can't even offer one insightful analysis on our finances during the years that he has been propped up on a sofa to talk about them. If I was a partner or boss in E&Y, I'd be cringing when he appeared.
  3. buster.
    BH Thank's for taking the time to put that together (post 27). What is being said by the board does seems contradictory and they also look to absolve themselves of any blame, which can't be seen by any viewer as reasonable. The post I refered to now makes sense to me and I've since further commented on related matters within this thread that also highlight the conduct of the board and the 'reasoning' behind decisions from Deloittes.
  4. buster.
    That was a fantastic pass & finish 6 inches less on the ball and Mulgrew get's in the way 6 inches more and Jelavic doesn't have the time to get himself together for the finish A game of inches !! 6min 25 secs into link
  5. buster.
    Click 'agree' on related posts by Rab.
  6. buster.
    This was at a time when there was cash and when IIRC their fees increased significantly. They signed off the accounts/going concern note that were published in October 2013 when Stockbridge was still at the 'frontline' 'bullshitting' his way through towards December, including a case at the CoS (post sign-off) where RIFC lost and the board were slated and thereafter further diminshed. The 2.5M unsecured facility seemed to be material in Deloittes being able to sign off the going concern note. This then seemed to dissappear when money was required and options were being explored. Not forgetting what was said by those in the so-called 'new board' at the AGM+.... that later didn't reconcile with reallity. The undercurrent and sometimes blatantly in your face poor corporate governence from the 'new' board that has in good part, the same movers and shakers under the hood is there if Deloittes choose to see it. So any assurances that were given that 'change' was on the way with a new coligiete, responsible and dynamic board that could raise sufficient finance and rebuild levels of trust with the fans has been proved to be balderdash. The dogs in the streets can see this (well, there are a couple who can't). Bottomline, it looks to me as if Deloittes have been prepared to 'let quite a lot go' and have at times taken their chances, so to speak.........not forgetting a fat wedge. Perhaps this is to a degree, a reflection of UKPLC in the 21st century.
  7. buster.
    After dispatching QPR with god knows how many millions of pounds worth of players, LVG is now talking about the title ! On October 26th Chelsea visit Old Trafford and a week later United visit Manchester City. Come back and tell us how things are after those games.
  8. buster.
    I think in giving out several one year contracts, we have gone down a not completely dissimilar route.
  9. buster.
    An interesting selection in that I'm sure if Mr.Calscot were to draw a much more mature lady than himself, he'd have no problems given his obvious awareness of the dangers of "ageism". This awareness is shown in the very post you nominate
  10. buster.
    Atletico have an exceptional manager who is exactly the right fit for that particular job. He prioritises the team over individuals and has more control in this regard than say his opposite number in Real Madrid. I'd say that Atletico were more a football team than a global brand.
  11. buster.
    Calscot, I take it that was a 'wind-up'. A satirical piss-take of how the '-ism's' are now often used as a spinning tool opposed to what they are apparently meant for.
  12. buster.
    Could we not arrange some kind of weekly award that has as an interesting and alternative prize. All those who put themselves forward for the competition must have a wife or girlfriend(s) and each week, once the award is decided upon,....there is a 'draw' to see which wife/girlfriend the winner gets to have take them out to dinner. Obviously the winner would have his W/GF withdrawn from the 'hat'. Some may need to consult their 'other half' of course but I'm sure most would be up for it (if they could get away with it).
  13. buster.
    Thank's GS ! I thought that to be the case but I'm confused by some of the wording related to what seems to have happened.
  14. buster.
    Yes, the TV companies could have saved the money and placed a 'textbook' on the sofa and quoted from it. As previously mentioned, the textbook and RIFC/TRFC are not aligned. One day there will be many books charting the sum of 'textbook+spi.vary'. What might have been interesting would have been the use of an expert like Patey beside an 'ex-sp.iv' (if such a thing exists) and seeing what they came up with.
  15. buster.
    Why exactly do you see it difficult for Deloittes to continue in their role ? ps. I'm struggling to understand the enboldened text in your first paragraph. If you have the time could you spell it out with dates/numbers please.
  16. buster.
    Morning Rab !! It's interesting you should ask that. When I think about it, the ongoing 'omnishambles' is such that whoever may be tasked as a 'financial expert' to judge what is going on at Ibrox has to go beyond the mere nuts and bolts of how things might usually develop and include the hidden and unknown 'spi.v factor/MO'.........that is, if he hopes to have a chance of being in the right ballpark. What we have is someone relating Rangers to a normal business, which in recent years means that you have no chance of getting it right. Tbf, it's very difficult/dangerous at times to second guess the 'sp.iv factor' and I wouldn't expect Patey to do so. However I would expect him to make very clear that this was the case, even if he did so with toned down references. ps. I'm no financial expert.
  17. buster.
    A secured loan or the facility to be called upon in the case that another potential share issue isn't successful,...... would make sense. Deloittes might like to remember what happened to the 2.5M unsecured facility they noted in last years accounts.
  18. buster.
    Fair speculation but it won't hide or change what Deloittes have to say in the note where they should sign-off on 12 months of the business being able to trade (going-concern). It will be interesting and informative to see how RIFC plan to finance the business / Deloittes being 'happy' that it is reliable. ps. Patey is a half-baked 'financial expert' who has struggled to see anything coming throughout the Omnishambles. Get a real one who isn't afraid to call things out as they are.
  19. buster.
    This can't last for another ten years. We are going to be a diluted force, it's a question of scale. We face not only the 'spi.v tax', assetstrip and insolvency event(s). We face it all within Scottish football that is financially contracting. Then we have to wonderr where the next generation of fans will come from. I note that the backpage of todays Daily Record gave 40% of space to Manchester United v QPR.
  20. buster.
    For me getting into Europe means getting past the summer qualifiers. There is only one team in that division that has a chance of making the group stages of either competition and even they had to get lucky this year.
  21. buster.
    I don't think it a sensible use of time trying to explain it to you as I haven't a spare 6 months. Some on here you can debate with, others like you refuse to 'to see' or acknowledge certain facts or issues, in such a way that goes beyond a differing opinion. The bottomline is that you are either thick, easily led or at it (as in poor agitating). I apoligise for the directness of language but sometimes there is no other choice if you want to put a point accross.
  22. buster.
    ...........................Muliplied by a factor of 70M Your constant refusal to acknowledge facts or try and justify/excuse X, Y & Z is breathtakingly foolish.
  23. buster.
    The irony is palpable. Not so much for an opinion, for which everyone is entitled but moreso a continuing refusal to recognise certain aspects of our situation.................Perhaps the 'Blind Loyal' would be a kinder and more accurate tag for you, Rab.
  24. buster.
    The Rizvi pic gave the impression that the sp.ivs had deliberately staged the opportunity. Bear in mind that Toxic advises the ex-con from Greenock. As we await to see if Deloittes can sign off the going concern note in the accounts and if they can, on what grounds...........Another AGM looms into view and we may be about to see more changes along with whatever goes down and a new stage about to begin. Laxey seem to be quiet and biding their time.
  25. buster.
    Waddell has shown of late to have a reasonable understanding of what has been going on, the bleakness of the situation and that there is pain ahead, whether it be of the acute variety that is a gamble or the inevitable road that fades and ends badly (but well for sp.ivs) and without even a fight. Alongside Richard Wilson, Keith Jackson (of occasion) and even Tom English (in his article of the other day) the spi.vs are shedding perceived clothes and being shown to have been in 'Birthday Suits'.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.