Jump to content

 

 

buster.

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    14,226

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    111

Everything posted by buster.

  1. buster.
    That is your opinion and you are welcome to it. I will say that if you stand for an election, you can't pick and choose the information that may come out. Nor was the thread linked originated with this election in mind, as it was from 2 years ago. [unreasonable comment Edited by Frankie]
  2. buster.
    Perhaps they need to hire Jack Irvine to get them 'up to the levels' of the Easdales.
  3. buster.
    As I said, a long thread.............. that contained varied material that I consider relevant to the candidates suitability. If you disagree, fine. [unreasonable comment Edited by Frankie]
  4. buster.
    Heavy and very direct 'blow' landed by UoF/SoS.
  5. buster.
    I think you'll find in what is a long thread that there are posters with "inside knowledge" as you call it. There are many others without whose opinion isn't based on direct knowledge but I've already said that there is subjective opinion within content. If people are able and choose to read the thread, they can decide for themselves. Just as those that can vote, can decide who they want to vote for. One thing I would say is that there may be a natural inclination amongst some to champion a candidate from Gersnet. I can understand why this may be but that it is not reason enough to stop the flow of relevant information on a candidate. If it were of an irrelevant nature then I wouldn't have posted the link. [unreasonable comments Edited by Frankie]
  6. buster.
    When you put yourself forward for election then it is legitimate for any relevant background info that there may be out there to be put forward. The opinions, some not kind, can be disregarded as subjective. [unreasonable comment Edited by Frankie]
  7. buster.
    A thread with some background and opinion to one of the candidates (Mr.Harris) has been 'bumped' from a couple of years ago on FF. For anyone interested, the link can be found on FF. [Edited by Frankie to remove direct link]
  8. buster.
    The last correction was regards the annoucement re 'Open Offer'. http://rangers.g3dhosting.com/regulatory_news_article/387 Coincidently it was the only annoucement of the last couple of months to have the name of Paul Tyrell beside that of GW.
  9. buster.
    Over a long period 'supposed corporate goverence', wordplay, incompetence and bullshit at RIFC have interacted and produced a pea-souper of a fog that you are supposed to get tired of trying to work-out. Instead they propose you vote for plastic engagement and continue or return to handing over the Blue Pound. And that was before today. I'm simply not sure of the situation re.Ahmad and will have to presume that funds are arrested or that his right to so do is still in place until told otherwise.
  10. buster.
    So relevant funds are currently arrested.
  11. buster.
    Be careful of what may be wrapped up as "really good news". Some of what was perceived at the time to be 'RGN' turned out to be worse than bad.
  12. buster.
    Easterly, pre November 1989, a wall on his right, the Stasi on his left and a glint of light to the front at the end of a tunnel. :seal:
  13. buster.
    ...one could call you a poster with 'vision'.
  14. buster.
    Par for the course then. These past few years have thrown up twists, turns, curveballs, bullshit so blatant it was accepted, a media devoid of investigative competence, long-running investigations that some of us may outlive, etc., etc........... If fully told in book form, it's first reviews may read...... .......the most strange, far-fetched and contrived corporate tale I've ever heard.............but it was actually allowed to happen (in a G7 country).
  15. buster.
    Call me ignorant of procedure but perhaps they should have used the alloted court-time from Friday and today to just hear the actual case and be done with it.
  16. buster.

    Buy Rangers

    buster. replied to Hildy's topic in Rangers Chat

    I can understand and share the frustration. My post was about recognizing the main root cause for why we are so polarised. I didn't take your post as an 'anti-anything' comment tbh and have no allegiences to any fans group other than general support for what the SoS have done.
  17. buster.

    Buy Rangers

    buster. replied to Hildy's topic in Rangers Chat

    Whether it could be or not is a question but for me you have to go wayback to the root of the division for the answer that might begin to shine a light on why we are presently where we are, regards 'polarised division'.
  18. buster.

    Share movement

    buster. replied to rbr's topic in Rangers Chat

    Sorry to be a pest but why ?........price / shifting deckchairs ??
  19. buster.

    Buy Rangers

    buster. replied to Hildy's topic in Rangers Chat

    I think you touch upon SDM/Jack Irvines most telling legacy which has since been carefully nutured by all the 'usual suspects' alongside 'el toxico'.
  20. buster.

    Share movement

    buster. replied to rbr's topic in Rangers Chat

    Was there a definitive or 'most plausible guess' as to what the trades meant ?
  21. buster.
    The crucial difference for me is that IMO he deliberatly pretends to be something that he is not, so as to deceive. What the effect is in part, is to nuture the seeds of division already sown by his Toxic friend many years ago aswell as the more immediate and timely interventions to suit the ongoing agenda of clients of said posionous dwarf. His activities via the web are revealing as to how McMurdo looks upon a world of (IMO somewhat sleekit) oppourtunities.
  22. buster.

    Share movement

    buster. replied to rbr's topic in Rangers Chat

    .........and then transferred back or somewhere else, 5 seconds later ?? 1. 09-Sep...........Time-..08:43:54secs............500,000 shares..........@25p 2. 09-Sep............Time-..08:43:59secs............500,000 shares..........@25p
  23. buster.
    You can understand your everyday sp.iv from afar sniffing money and wanting a share. That is their MO and they have few morals that get in the way. However McMurdo (a 'Rangers supporter') and what he has been doing really 'sticks in the craw'. If you see him as an extension of another 'Rangers supporter', Jack Irvine.....then I guess he's following a path already trodden. However, to put yourself forward as a blogger when in fact you are an agitator is beyond the pale and IMO dishonest.
  24. buster.
    The bullshit is getting more blatant. You'd imagine that there is a reason for that.
  25. buster.
    Probably more likely a player with potential to become as good, but they wouldn't be around for long. Simple realities for Rangers and Scottish football in general.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.