buster.
-
Posts
14,224 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
111
Everything posted by buster.
-
Last time, we were told that the 'last lot' were to blame apart from Brian Stockbridge who kept the company going and that the 'new lot' are collegiate, trustworthy, have a plan and will find investment. Fast forward and we've had more of the same regards shennanigans, lack of transparency, copious spin, money vanishing quickly, despite promises little investment forthcoming, damp squib of a plan, 120 days of due diligence that failed to find the Stockbridge contract options etc, etc. You'd almost think the same folk were at the heart of it.
-
12 points from 8 games....... (Moyes had 11 from 8)......Remember that LVG doesn't have European midweek games. How many extra millions has LVG spent for that extra point ? Next two League matches Chelsea (H) Manchester City (A)
-
Whilst he was obviously more sympathetic to the requisitioners proposals, he wasn't really involved.
-
If referring to the letter of requisition (1/8/13) and what led up to the AGM in December of the same year, DK wasn't directly involved with the parties involved.
-
Objectivity isn't their strong suit then ? May have to go in 'under cover' and just have a butchers.
-
I'm going to need a log-in
-
Anyone know if this was posted on Rangers Media ? Haven't got access to their 'board chat'.
-
Newcastle United have become collateral damage in the battle for Rangers
buster. replied to ian1964's topic in Rangers Chat
Same people who bought the line about Green&Co having to have Rangers perform well as a club and company to be able to make any money ? Don't forget to spin the regular 'financially logical' line about the "Champions League" aswell. Sometimes used blatantly, others more subtley. Get the support to connect XX (then CG, in this case MA) with CL and a rosey future. -
Newcastle United have become collateral damage in the battle for Rangers
buster. replied to ian1964's topic in Rangers Chat
Rab, you really should have learnt by now not to put too much faith into lazy 'financial logic'. I'm no expert in corporate finance and will make my own mistakes but try and learn from them. -
Regards the quote from the Sports Direct AGM (Sept 2014) I'll put up the full transcript between journalists and members of the SD board (including Ashely), regarding Newcastle and Rangers. http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/after-five-years-silence-newcastle-4197405
-
Thanks for the response , Bluedell. Whilst appreciating what you say, I think there are sufficent signs regards what has happened at NUFC and how SD have structured and established contracts with Rangers to show that MA meant what he said at the SD AGM, when he replied to the question "I wonder if he (MA) could explain the benefits to Sports Direct in its relationship with Newcastle United and Rangers.” ........“Other than to say than it’s been beneficial to Sports Direct and therefore its shareholders, I don’t think it’s appropriate to comment.”
-
For the avoidance of doubt, I go by the username of buster on FF and wrote the article. I used some of the same figures as a previous post but the article is very much longer than said post. Anyone have any thoughts on it ?
-
Pre AGM, whenever CK opened his mouth regards Rangers he misled or told lies. Remember the "Crighton has nothing to do with us" (I'm para-phrasing) Then at the AGM, Crighton saying "I represent Laxey Partners".
-
Give him time. I'd imagine that it will be waiting and depend on what happens today. If there was still nothing by this time tomorrow then I'd say it was verging on the 'unusual'. The rumours thus far have been of Monday as a day that something may be announced. So this timing may have to be considered when thinking about a possible spinning 'counter-attack' of indeterminate relevance. Only time will tell.............
-
This was from a week ago, so it was known that an important juncture was just around the corner regards the efforts of DK, GL &Co. It remains to be seen what the outcome will be and in the case of 'an agreement' what the detail will entail.
-
Good video of Scottish and Polish fans post game. https://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/fp/sport/football/373582/video-polish-fans-wait-tartan-army-outside-stadium-applaud-atmosphere/
-
Ashely eventualy went Wonga !!
-
Slowly but surely, matters are coming to a head with various cut-off dates starting to take shape, even if exact dates are yet unknown. DK deadline (apparent) EGM Accounts (Deloittes signing off going concern) AGM Cashflow
-
The selective boycott of BBC Scotland ends up hurting us more than it does the BBC.
-
.......and the Easdale Front more than willing providers.
-
Time is ticking................ Nine days since receipt of the EGM request. On the three requisitions for an EGM (below) you can see a slight difference in how the 'company' responded. For the EGM request made by spi.vs to fellow spi.vs (May 2013) there was seemingly no check necessary of the constitution of the requisition. Howver on the other two, there was. Given the latest is by a spi.v to seemingly another group of spi.vs, perhaps it helps to further illustrate where the power currently lies upstairs. ie. Easdale Proxies. It also helps place Blue Pitch in the very centre of it (Requisition 16/5/13....the proposed Chris Morgan, a man with Rizvi connections who Sandy Easdale talked up in December 2013). Add this to the Rangers Standard revelations Requisition of EGM 16/5/13 (pro-spi.v measures) No checks mentioned http://rangers.g3dhosting.com/regulatory_news_article/304 Requisition of EGM 1/8/13 (anti-spi.v measures) "The Board is verifying whether the Requisition is properly constituted and further announcements will be made as appropriate." http://rangers.g3dhosting.com/regulatory_news_article/316 Requisition of EGM 7/10/14 ('anti-spi.v measures' by other spi.v interest) "The Company is currently verifying that the Notice is properly constituted". http://rangers.g3dhosting.com/regulatory_news_article/405 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Aside: Each passing Nomad seems to get a requisition to deal with. 10 days after the withdrawal of the first EGM request, Cenkos left the building. 18 days after the withdrawal of the second EGM request, Strand Hanson left the building.
-
Isn't Sandy Easdale the main man at TRFC ? He had Toxic set-up the BBC ready for the door-step interview. Via Toxic, hands various 'exclusives' to McLaughlin and Lamont (BBC). ps. I know you know etc
-
‘Could do better’ – Louis van Gaal’s report card at Manchester United http://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2014/oct/15/louis-van-gaal-report-card-manchester-united I reckon if Moyes had been able to spend the same money then he'd probably still be in a job. Although he'd have had to have been more ruthless and got rid of the chief dissenters sharpish.
-
IMO, he's burnt his bridges. He's proved himself to be more Judas than Merlin the 'blogger' and has previous with what I'd regard as dubious activities trying to raise money for himself (Financial Abundance Preaching). He puts himself forward as a blogger when he is only a pointed agitator being fed his lines by one of the most damaging individuals throughout the whole soap opera.
-
8th October 2014 The Company announces that it has received a notice dated 7 October 2014 from Mike Ashley, a director of MASH Holdings Limited ("MASH") under Section 303 of the Companies Act 2006. The notice states that MASH holds 4,265,000 Ordinary Shares of 1p each in the Company amounting to 5% of the voting rights of the Company. MASH requires the Company to call a general meeting of the Shareholders of the Company and to put certain resolutions to Shareholders for inclusion in the business at such a general meeting of the Company (the "Notice"). The Notice puts forward resolutions for the removal of Graham Wallace and Philip Nash as directors of the Company. The Company is currently verifying that the Notice is properly constituted. If valid, the Board intends to seek to have such Notice withdrawn in order to avoid the cost and disruption of an ad hoc general meeting particularly given the Company's forthcoming Annual General Meeting, further details of which will be announced in due course. The Board is united in its support of the executive team. If the Notice is valid and is not withdrawn, the Directors intend to recommend that Shareholders vote against the proposed resolutions. A further announcement will be made shortly. http://rangers.g3dhosting.com/regulatory_news_article/405 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- One week and counting...............