Jump to content

 

 

buster.

  • Posts

    13,902
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    103

Everything posted by buster.

  1. Earlier today Wasp, Der Berliner and Rab decided to get a group photograph taken.
  2. Story in tomorrow's DR........... "Rangers fan wakes up after being in coma since 2011"
  3. Like the branding. The sad thing, is that for me Bill is the worse of the two. With 3names, you get what you expect but with McMurdo, he is shitting on his own doorstep.
  4. He obviously has a source(s) within the club and of late close to what is going on. Some of the stuff he has been saying this year has been accurate. He is overly anxious to be seen as the 'main NUJ man' bringing daily exclusives and tends to go out on a limb and throw what seems to be everything out there which in a fluid situation will come back and bite you at times. The other issue to consider is the reliability and agenda of a particular source. He's been given some bum steers at times (or made them up) but then the rumour is that one of his sources was/is Imran Ahmad. IMO the best way of keeping track is too consider all of what is out there, who is putting it out there regards previous record, listen to anyone you might know yourself, personal interpretation/experience of saga.....put it in a mixer and reach conclusions/theories of your own.
  5. At levels beyond Reme there may be 'interests' and particular agendas.... but generally with Reme, it's probably a mix of lunacy, agitation and differing opinions.
  6. Until you get to the root, there will always be someone there fronting it. In this case, there is a director of TRFC with a dodgy past, meeting with the mysterious RR (possibly already involved+) with a dodgy past talking about our future. The UoF statement cleverly ties in Somers and Crighton. If Easdale was to 'fall' (perhaps as planned) then James would follow on.
  7. James Easdale gets locked in a large cupboard between matchdays, although he doe gets conversation classes Mon-Fri between 4 and 5pm. Seriously, I think the UoF are right to concentrate on Sandy Easdale (the convicted fraudster / alledged shadow director of RIFC), the individual who is clearly the front of the 'mysterious' and the man meeting Rizvi. If Sandy had to leave then James isn't capable of filling the gap. Back in the day (May 2013*) Chris Morgan was considered for a similar/additional role (occasionally vocal front) to help fill the shoes of Green but the negotiated outcome seemed to have James join the board of RIFC and then the 'mysterious' had to have Sandy Easdale act as a shadow director via TRFC. *http://rangers.g3dhosting.com/regulatory_news_article/304
  8. Aye, should be letting the fraudsters get on with the the good job they are doing. copyright: Reme Moses
  9. Excellent article by Sid Lowe For full article click http://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2014/sep/15/arda-turan-atletico-madrid-real-madrid-derby-la-liga
  10. He was mentioned on recordings and there were alleged but convincing e-mails leaked by 'Charlotte' that detailed proposals coming from RR.
  11. Yes, the line runs through Rizvi/Blue Pitch or/and other mysterious groups Green&Co Easdales Irvine (ever present)
  12. It would rather go against the Toxic advice that is close at hand, usually things are done for a reason and this was a sensitive issue. Meeting up with Rizvi publicly in Glasgow would have presented obvious dangers to further destabilise matters when looking for finance and for Deloittes to sign off on the accounts (appreciate this may already be in hand). The advice would surely have been to hold the meeting elsewhere or at least not appear in public together, unless they wanted the pic's published................
  13. Do you reckon the Easdales might be leaving the stage soon ? The Rizvi pic opportunity made me start to think that the 'engineering' may be underway.
  14. Thank's Forlan, does anyone know of a particular reason for their non-appearence ?
  15. Another question, this time for Bears that were accross in Kirkcaldy for the Raith game. Did anyone spot the Easdales ? They weren't in the set of Willie Vass pic's, which is the first time for a while that I can remember that being the case.
  16. Can anyone recall if Easdale or any named individual from RIFC or TRFC made any comment on Rizvi being with the visiting party from Malaysia ?
  17. It wasn't a statement as such. I don't think it went out on the official site. The STV were briefed by a "Rangers spokesman" and the club were obviously happy to let it pass at the time. Green&Co/ Rizvi/ Mystery investor block/............. Green/ Easdale/ Proxy/ Rizvi/ Toxic spokesman/......STV
  18. Multiply by 70M Not a penny more........
  19. I wonder why we don't believe a word that comes out of Ibrox ? This was called out for being cr@p at the time and it doesn't seem to have taken long for confirmation.
  20. Zappa I don't think Patey appears to do anymore than have a skim through numbers and thereafter look to adopt a non-controversial, safe and general line in answering questions. It's representative of the way the mainstream have covered our omnishambles. The so-called expert can't even offer one insightful analysis on our finances during the years that he has been propped up on a sofa to talk about them. If I was a partner or boss in E&Y, I'd be cringing when he appeared.
  21. BH Thank's for taking the time to put that together (post 27). What is being said by the board does seems contradictory and they also look to absolve themselves of any blame, which can't be seen by any viewer as reasonable. The post I refered to now makes sense to me and I've since further commented on related matters within this thread that also highlight the conduct of the board and the 'reasoning' behind decisions from Deloittes.
  22. That was a fantastic pass & finish 6 inches less on the ball and Mulgrew get's in the way 6 inches more and Jelavic doesn't have the time to get himself together for the finish A game of inches !! 6min 25 secs into link
  23. This was at a time when there was cash and when IIRC their fees increased significantly. They signed off the accounts/going concern note that were published in October 2013 when Stockbridge was still at the 'frontline' 'bullshitting' his way through towards December, including a case at the CoS (post sign-off) where RIFC lost and the board were slated and thereafter further diminshed. The 2.5M unsecured facility seemed to be material in Deloittes being able to sign off the going concern note. This then seemed to dissappear when money was required and options were being explored. Not forgetting what was said by those in the so-called 'new board' at the AGM+.... that later didn't reconcile with reallity. The undercurrent and sometimes blatantly in your face poor corporate governence from the 'new' board that has in good part, the same movers and shakers under the hood is there if Deloittes choose to see it. So any assurances that were given that 'change' was on the way with a new coligiete, responsible and dynamic board that could raise sufficient finance and rebuild levels of trust with the fans has been proved to be balderdash. The dogs in the streets can see this (well, there are a couple who can't). Bottomline, it looks to me as if Deloittes have been prepared to 'let quite a lot go' and have at times taken their chances, so to speak.........not forgetting a fat wedge. Perhaps this is to a degree, a reflection of UKPLC in the 21st century.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.