Jump to content

 

 

buster.

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    13,908

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    103

 Content Type 

Everything posted by buster.

  1. buster.
    Both campaigns were badly flawed in different ways. The Yes campaign hadn't done the necessary graft/(pre) negotiation required beforehand so as to provide conclusive and unambiguous answers on the vital issues. This deficit was partly filled by Nationalist rhetoric. I remember Salmond waving the Saltire at Wimbledon after Murray won the championship and thought he'd have been so much better giving the flag to his wife. This for me showed patriotism and emotion coming before politics which in one way may be considered an 'honest reaction' but one that carried on into the campaign........
  2. buster.
  3. buster.
    I think it is for everyone who so wishes to engage in whatever "fight" against perceived "social injustice" and not for one particular sub-section of society. I think you are mistaken if you think everyone who voted No is what I presume to be your definition of a Unionist (feel free to clarify). I think a majority of No votes will have been made for personal reasons involving finances and a fear of the unknown. To be clear, IMO the Yes campaign was too full of bluster and waving of the Saltire but your rhetoric isn't disimilar but waving a different flag. Whilst there will be a period of metaphorical conflict, what this country needs is less division and more attention focused towards real problems, that goes for both sides. ps. I must note that 'division' seems to be a speciality of a certain group you belong to.
  4. buster.
    Just to add on from FF, to complete the conversation....... buster seems to speak a lot of sense
  5. buster.
    Is this or has it been spun like the equivalent of the board of any football club, giving their manager the 'vote of confidence' ?
  6. buster.
    Bit of a giggle ..........................................................................................................................still going to win the title Louis ?
  7. buster.
    Mr.Wasp, are you an Alloa supporter having a dig ? ........... ......... and in the interests of clarity, does your question refer to the football, the financial or both ?? Would the club be better run (longterm interests of Rangers FC) if a lollipop man replaced the board of RIFC ?
  8. buster.
    I think so many of these type of lines have been used so many times, switching to another and then back again that fans hardly even notice them pass by. Bottomline, there comes a time when the support get 'Omnishambles-Fatigue.'
  9. buster.
    Regards FS, in event of him being elected, I don't think we or other forums should forget that his primary concern will most probably be 'what it says on the tin', ie. the 'lot' of the disabled fan on matchdays etc. TheWeeBlueDevil I'd add sleekit and slippery to your collection of adjectives. The type that might Smile whilst Stabbing you in the back.
  10. buster.
    Some may consider that to be part of a logical chain of unfortunate events.
  11. buster.
    I don't think it was the brightest of ideas to arrange this fixture so soon after the referendum although I guess money trumps everything else.
  12. buster.
    Hildy, I think you put forward a reasonable question to ask those who are standing for a representative role. I don't know how many of them may look in on Gersnet but BH is certainly on here and could perhaps respond.
  13. buster.
    Difficult to know for sure but one thing we do know is that the budget has been reduced for supporting infrastructure regards the football operation and that certainly won't have helped. It has to be said that over the years, our record regards similar type incidents around the treatment room and medical section has been poor. That goes for the pre-sp.iv era aswell.
  14. buster.
    There may well be but I read what Forlan says and how he says it and that isn't the impression I'm getting here for two particular reasons but given what Frankie said, I'll leave it there. Bear in mind I've got a doctorate in 'reading between the lines'
  15. buster.
    Poor form, taking a complaint direct to Rangers. Why would 'X' do that ?
  16. buster.

    Share movement

    buster. replied to rbr's topic in Rangers Chat

    Probably the websites late to update but you would have thought there may have been an annoucement to confirm.
  17. buster.

    Share movement

    buster. replied to rbr's topic in Rangers Chat

    Have the 15M+ shares been added to the market today as per the regulatory notice ? On the following 2 websites that follow our shares, they both still have the 65.81M shares as in issue. http://www.lse.co.uk/SharePrice.asp?shareprice=RFC http://www.iii.co.uk/research/LSE%3ARFC/fundamentals Any experts care to comment..........
  18. buster.

    Share movement

    buster. replied to rbr's topic in Rangers Chat

    I'm not going to argue numbers and neither am I hear to promote anything but whatever formula you use, it is a veritble non-stop metropolis of cyber activity measured within the footballing messageboard world.............I find it quite remarkable !!
  19. buster.
    I think it fair to mention that FS generally has a reputation for having a firm grasp on events and not commenting if he thinks that grasp not to be firm. When he is moved to comment on a particular issue, he also tends to be accurate. ie. FS has earned the right to be what you perceive as "hard-headed".
  20. buster.
    Given circumstances, the more honest thing for whoever it was would have been to debate the point rather than go running to try and get a candidate into trouble with such insignificant material. Irrespective of this, the board of RIFC would rather you not be elected and would most probably look favourably on the source of such input or have had others look for 'opportunities' or 'sticks' with what to beat you.
  21. buster.

    Share movement

    buster. replied to rbr's topic in Rangers Chat

    Home to over 70,000 members.........quite a remarkable number. There can't be many other such forums in the UK with such a number.
  22. buster.
    Not ready or able to answer unless your questions are 'harmless' The board want (Plastic and Controllable) Engagement and Communication..........or in other words..... The board want your cash with no awkward questions attached.
  23. buster.
    From the Telegraph (full article on link below) "The Rangers Fans Fighting Fund – which controls just over £500,000 of supporters’ donations – has decided to withhold any payments to the club because of what it considers to be inadequate responses to questions about the future." http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/rangers/11103118/Rangers-Fans-Fighting-Fund-withholds-funds-over-concerns-for-clubs-future.html
  24. buster.
    Looks like the RFFF might be putting pressure on the board for more transparency, rather than throwing money at them. ie. 'public pressure' to show their MO
  25. buster.
    Copied from FF Letter from GW to RFFF
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.