buster.
-
Posts
13,902 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
103
Everything posted by buster.
-
The hearing today was about CW and the banning order. The wider issues involving more than just CW are still to come.
-
Quite, I hope he isn't being used as a scapegoat for all. Has SDM been in the station to have a chat ? Just to help piece some of the jigsaw together.
-
Thank's ! Practical example please So the "sell" of over 4M shares was so termed (LSE website) because ...........................
-
Practical example please So the "sell" of over 4M shares was so termed (LSE website) because ...........................
-
Certainly not at 20p a share.
-
Wrong is wrong, don't mince yir words laddie So they ('buy' and 'sell') are decorative rather than informative ?
-
Thanks for your input. What I was getting at was why a trade should be termed a 'buy' or a 'sell' as per the LSE website. http://www.lse.co.uk/ShareTrades.asp?shareprice=RFC&share=rangers_int On that, is the rational I use in the post you quoted, right or wrong ?
-
Currently about 81M (shares) x 21p which will be about 17M ------------------------------------------------------ edit.: LSE site says 18.33M http://www.lse.co.uk/SharePrice.asp?shareprice=RFC ie. 81.48M x 22.5p
-
The way I understand it there is a bid price (BP)and an ask price (AP). If you have a look at the link you'll see presently the BP is 21p and the AP is 24p. http://www.lse.co.uk/ShareTrades.asp?shareprice=RFC&share=rangers_int If you look at the list of trades below on the same link you'll see a trade this morning at 10:36 in blue (buy) with a price used of 23.025p. ie. closer to the AP and therefore called a "buy". Whereas the large trade for over 4M shares was traded at 20p, closer to the BP and therefore a "sell" and denoted red by the LSE website. That's what my logic is although a Financial Bear might tell me that I am worse than befuddled. CAUTION: don't take the above as gospel until it were confirmed (or otherwise) by expert.
-
I'm not a Financial Trading Bear but simple logic says an announced 'trade' for XXp needs a buyer aswell as a seller. I think that when announced as a 'sell' it has something to do with being traded at or closer to the 'bid' price. FTBs can confirm or otherwise............
-
Waiting for the notice.................. But who will be buying ?? ........and will the notice tell us tha actual ID ?
-
Not many with those amount of shares, so the seller is one of 4 or 5 parties.
-
If they are sold then surely someone has bought.
-
Surely the trade of 4,265,000 shares will have to generate a regulatory notice later today. Over 5% of the share capital.
-
Fan board elections now closed as of Saturday 20 September
buster. replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
Hearts have got their act together as a football club, both on and off the park and they seem to have strategies in place for both. What is notable is the owership issue which has been addressed and now has the support paying money over time so as to take a very significant role upstairs in the running of their club. That is in direct contrast to our 'OMNISHAMBLES'.....both on and off the park where they think "Strategy" is a place in Norway to go and play a pre-season friendly..............but then that would be forgetting what the sp.ivs are really here for, have their strategy (plus contingencies) in place but aren't for telling us. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Note I think we should lobby so as to have a 'warning' of sorts attached to your posts .................... -
Fan board elections now closed as of Saturday 20 September
buster. replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
-
Fan board elections now closed as of Saturday 20 September
buster. replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
-
Fan board elections now closed as of Saturday 20 September
buster. replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
I don't know but do consider the reasons as to why thousands of fans aren't attending Ibrox to be more important. -
Fan board elections now closed as of Saturday 20 September
buster. replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
Must be slow today as I don't 'get' the PLG reference ! I think you'll find that there are an awful lot more than one choosing not to go to Ibrox. It's mainly because of the way the club has and is being run. Indidividuals are quite free to attend and even fill Ashelys pockets aswell by spending money in the stadium superstore but they should realise that they will be present as they watch the lifeblood of the club sucked out of it. We have reached this point of 'no reasons to be happy' because we had too many blockheads within the support, that laid out the red carpet for the dodgy geezers who have passed through the club and left with castles and the odd chateaux. Too many willing to fall for the Toxic Jack Irvine brand of bullshit or complicit for their own reasons. And as for being on topic, remember Toxic Jack was involved in the putting the fansboard idea together. -
Fan board elections now closed as of Saturday 20 September
buster. replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
Looks like I missed a bit of a stooshie at the weekend. The fansboard does seem to have achieved part of it's goal though, ie. further bitter division and 'political' attention drifting from the RIFC board during what seems a relative lull. As for the 'football' attention, I think tonight's attendence will show that is drifting aswell. The repercussions of which become 'political' at the present juncture. Not a penny more, empty blue seats is the language they understand. -
You don't seem to be aware of much considering the weight of opinion you tend to put forward.
-
I don't think this the place to make specific references to things that are out there and other more recent ones that aren't as yet. I wiil say that it's heavily ironic that the term 'grass' has been used in connection with FS and his bid as a shareholder to clear some of the fog surrounding RIFC and it's version of corporate governance. I'll also say more generally (without going into great detail at this point/on this thread) for the support as a whole that it is my belief that if BH was to be an 'office-bearer' on the fansboard that he would be used/played by the incumbent RIFC board as part of their bid to control/manage the fansboard............ Hence, be careful. Another day and another thread, I'd gladly go into more detail as to why I think that to be the case.
-
Without derailing the thread, generally the old saying............'no smoke without fire' is apt here.............and you'd do well to admit it instead of always playing the 'innocent party'. People dealing with you should be 'very careful'.
-
The Rangers saga...........................Spinning bullshit part 4728 Let's see................Ashely ......... - Charles Green's mate - Used for creaming off cash / Jim Park. - Onerous Contracts - Misleading 'headline' on % ownership/control re. joint venture with Rangers Retail and Sports Direct. - Rights for naming Ibrox for a Quid. - At Newcastle, the fans hate him. - Newcastle, known for being the least ambitious club in EPL. - Newcastle, doesn't give a monkeys about the fans. - Doesn't communicate.........unless you count spinning bullshitters on his behalf. I could go on but......... Is Mike Ashely perfect for Rangers ? I guess that depends if you have the longterm future of the club at heart or are into Sports Direct increasing their profits.
-
Fan board elections now closed as of Saturday 20 September
buster. replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
Aye, it run through my mind aswell. He was part of putting it all together in the run up to the AGM of 2013 and subsequently trying to 'sell' / 'test the water' with the idea on messageboards, in January 2014.