Jump to content

 

 

buster.

  • Posts

    13,921
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    103

Everything posted by buster.

  1. Tend to think what you suggest will be the case here. IIRC Roddy has shown before to have good sources when it comes to the investigative authorities in and around our soap opera.
  2. No, but neither does it say they didn't. During part of the period in question, the 120 day review was in progress and would have involved the trawling of much documentation. Stockbridge left his role in January. During the 120 days, they didn't seem to find the information on the share options that later surfaced.
  3. Three football clubs show up on the Kieth Bishop Clients page Rangers Newcastle Leeds You can see the type of PR that KB seems to have a talent for when it comes to football. http://www.kbapr.com/our-clients/sports/
  4. "In a further development, the Telegraph understands that while Wallace and Nash were still in their posts, documents related to the 2012 share issue were passed to the Serious Fraud Office for investigation. The SFO had no comment to make last night." Roddy Forsyth in the Telegraph http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/rangers/11231964/Former-Rangers-owner-Craig-Whyte-set-to-face-arrest-warrant-as-four-others-are-detained-by-police.html Seemingly passed to the SFO between January and October this year.
  5. Yes he was but the mysterious payments to Bishops raise questions. They link Stockbridge directly to these payments and a trip to London where he appears to have been influenced in some way so as to not to terminate the contract with an agency that looks to come under a company that had Llambias on a 2 man board. Bishop is the Ashely spindoctor. Llambias is his 'Corporate Gofer' Needs more investigation, probably leading to questions for Derek Llambias.
  6. Copland Road had a good article up with a copy of an invoice for the first quarter of 2013 to be prepaid. This invoice was dated 13/12/12, around the time of the IPO. From the Copland Road article Full article at http://www.thecoplandroad.org/2014/09/what-was-mike-ashleys-preferred-pr-firm.html ----------------------------------- Taking this a little further you see that Derek Llambias was a director at Keith Bishop Public Relations Limited. He appears to have been on that board alongside Kieth Bishop. Furthermore his directorship would appear to have been terminated recently although I can find no exact date for that. I presume that this company would be linked to the PR agency in the invoice run by the same Keith Bishop. http://www.rangers.co.uk/news/headlines/item/7983-appointment-of-director Llambias and Rangers may go back further than we think. But more to the point, what were these payments from Rangers to Bishop Associates for ? We know they spoke this week but when did Llambias first speak to Stockbridge and what about ?
  7. Maybe a small part of it went to Bishop Associates, the Ashely spindoctor and where Llambias had involvement in the boardroom.
  8. Seems very prepared to 'wash his hands' of them re. work commenced pre MCR takeover by D&P / work for CW. The apparent commissioning of another investigation also points to further doubt. Other thing is were they not partners, rather than employees ? As DragonT mentioned earlier.
  9. He could do a house swap with Rafat Rizvi.
  10. Interesting segment at 15mins 55secs 'RANGERS ADMINISTRATORS PRESS CONFERENCE ( FULL )' 1. Jacksons question is good. 2. Clark answer unsatisfactory 3. Whitehouse explanation actually helps paint the picture when you take into consideration the reallities of the situation within the period he talks about.
  11. Will he tell the Polis about how he duped Sir Duped of Murray ? They say it's awfae difficult to kid a kidder.
  12. I reckon it's probably more shock (or pleasent surprise) at them getting pulled in.
  13. They haven't been arrested and it is too early to say. 'Gratuitous alienation' has been speculated on in the past. A transfer of property by a debtor to another person for no consideration or for an inadequate consideration. Such alienations in the period up to 5 years prior to the date of sequestration are open to a statutory challenge by the permanent trustee; alienations outwith that period can only be challenged at common law http://www.govanlc.com/debtdictionary.htm#g
  14. Within the four named by The Scottish Sun, Grier would seem to provide the link which spans both the sale of Rangers in 2011 and the purchase of assets in 2012. All continues to be speculation but if the two court appointed administrators are helping Police Scotland with their enquires it gets interesting and you wonder about the actual transaction where Green&Co bought the assets.
  15. Yes, a partner, my mistake. Doing a Kevin Keegan impression as I give it.... (if charged and found guilty) "I'd love to see him in a cell with horny Big Winston"
  16. It was Sir Duped of Murray who for some reason allowed CW to takeover the club, ignoring concerns raised by the Independent Board Committee and an alternative offer. Apparently the bank strongly advised SDM on this course of action. The SFA and it's regulations at that point puts the onus on the club to do the due diligence. After BBC Scotland revealed a previous directorship ban on CW in October 2011, the SFA wrote to CW/Rangers but I don't believe ever received a satisfactory reply from CW/Rangers. There were no accounts or AGM in 2011.
  17. Grier is an important link throughout. IIRC, author (whilst with bank) of the floating charge for Sir Duped in 1999 Advisor to CW pre and post takeover (2010/11) Partner of MCR taken over by Duff and Phelps He was present at the meeting (Charlotte Square, Edinburgh) during the administration process that saw Clark and Whitehouse speak to SDM and McGill.
  18. You might be too late. I reckon 'interested and opportunist parties' might have already put down a deposit, or at least tried to. There is a market for them and you'd imagine they'll be going cheap (if they're selling).
  19. Inevitable. Now....what do they do with the stock ?
  20. The world of 'enemy cabals' are mainly used to deflect attention away from reallity. Follow the Money.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.