Jump to content

 

 

buster.

  • Posts

    14,139
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    110

Everything posted by buster.

  1. Good effort Zappa ! According to official site (although Crighton may have sold his) David Somers 61,186 0.08% Norman Crighton 96,222 0.12%
  2. That was what will have turned the heads of our soap opera's casting department. Trying to up the ante further....... I see that the article in the OP already has him with Rangersitis
  3. The above was published a few days ago. I'd like to ask how Mr Sarver managed to conduct due diligence (4th line) ?
  4. No, I'm not kidding. I'm making a point about vigilance and to you, pointing out that you used an AJ quote selectively to help paint a positive picture about Mr Sarver. As for the historic, I have often challanged your stance or thinking on various matters but this is a forum where people may disagree. For a change, try looking at it from the POV that you may be wrong and not that everyone is out to get you.
  5. Take the personal out of it and take on board what I am saying in relation to the post I first addressed. It's about promoting due vigilance and awareness.
  6. Are you seriously expecting anyone to pay any atention to what levels of vigilance you think are appropriate ? ...
  7. This soap opera has had it all. We even had court appointed administrators who criminal charges have been brought against.
  8. You are struggling again BH. If one refuses to learn from poor past performance then you are more liable to repeat your mistakes. I pointed out that your use of what AJ had to say was somewhat selective, unbalanced and without just qualification given the impression you painted. If you did this knowingly, then why ?
  9. You often point to historical track records and CV's wrt individuals involved or looking to be involved with Rangers but yet you pointedly ignore advice from someone with a 100% record in the relevant area.
  10. You don't mention that AJ said some other things about Sarver regards his approach to takeover Rangers. For your own benefit I would caution you on selective quoting from individuals wrt supposed 'suitors' of Rangers. Scepticism and vigilance should be the standard approach for Bears. After your own experiences of falling for bullshit from the boardroom, it might be wise to learn lessons.
  11. I centre my scepticism on the lack of credible detail on motives, plans and necessary finance going forward. A lack of detail should be met by scepticism, it should be standard.
  12. Don't buy that DR could sell him the idea to throw millions at a bottomless pit with a raging fire burning most who go near. Another American came, looked at the books and fled. Further down the line, the situation is worse and we suddenly get this guy without a good reason or a viable plan. Sorry, but as it stands, it smells of shite.
  13. Mr Sarver, have you or any of your advisors, employees or associates ever spoken to Mike Ashley, his advisors, employees, associates or anyone at all connected to MA ?
  14. Ok Mr Sarver,...................to start with, please fully explain why you want to take over Rangers and a detailed plan going forward, including an outline of how you propose to finance that over the short and medium term giving us the numbers your due diligence expects the club will need in that time.
  15. Puts you in mind of our NOMAD(s) where some employees seem to do walkabout from one name to another. Not connected with WH Ireland, but another lesson of the last few years to add to the taking little notice of 'good CV's' is that company names aren't sacred and seem to change frequently, why ever should that be ?
  16. - I thought some of the PR blurb that came out in the last few days was from a very familiar script, eg. info that David Mason relayed. (Alex Barr is his spindoctor) - The (personal) statement made a lot of the David Robertson angle, quoting numbers from his career but didn't tell us enough regards his motivation, which I can't figure out. - The timing makes it into an effort to keep Rangers minded men away from Executive Control.
  17. I close the circle of tonights contribution on this thread by going back to my first......... ......."Like many of our support, you aim your 'barbs' in the wrong direction." Try to keep on topic please.
  18. Let's get back to the thread and the strange interpretations of Corporate Governance by our Chairman, Mr Somers.
  19. It's a strange new world out there.
  20. Like many of our support, you aim your 'barbs' in the wrong direction.
  21. Wrote the above yesterday. Very much with the AJ line on this. Until you earn Trust with Real Transparency, plans and money................you simply don't get any, it should be our default setting.
  22. ... more from FF. Ashley is making sure he's in the strongest possible position before any negotiation and won't go cheaply (if he goes or 'does something else'). The onerous retail/commercial deals with Ashley will be like a lead weight at a time when we need as much revenue as possible. Ashley will not only want the deals to remain in place but he'll want any board to vouch for them and discourage 'boycotts' of merchandise. For which he'll concede something (needed facesaver) but I doubt it will be enough to make the contracts in the best interests of the club.
  23. Rumours abound that Fullerton and Lawwell have them locked up in a second floor office at Hampden.
  24. Several things from recent months suggest Ashley was preparing his ground for what was coming. Still a large obstacle with onerous roots, difficult/expensive to extract.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.