Jump to content

 

 

buster.

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    14,025

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    103

 Content Type 

Everything posted by buster.

  1. buster.
    I'd prefer the likes of Lambias and the Leach to fcuk off and take their lies with them. They not only shouldn't be there (SFA rules/agreement) but they are furthering the interests of Sports Direct at the expense of Rangers*. Cutting back every last cost could be understood if it wasn't an attempt to allow SD to be able to cream off as much as possible. You mistake your 'enemy'. * They are directors of TRFC and Rangers Retail Ltd aswell as RIFC
  2. buster.
    Kenny McDowall opens up on the Nacho Novo row and insists: "I was only doing what the board ordered me to" http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/kenny-mcdowall-opens-up-nacho-5060509 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Kenny McDowell in one line has already destroyed the RIFC board statement on Novo. Q. When do you know the RIFC/TRFC boards lie to us ? A. Whenever they open their mouths (actual or electronic). It has been plain for a longtime that the board hold us in utter contempt but they seem to get more brazen with the passing of time. -------------------------------------------------- Novo on twitter @nnovo1010: they are unreal liars but even worse using Fernandos name as a excuse is disgusting me , idiots
  3. buster.
    How Not to Run a Football Club, part 7596. by Sandy Easdale.......... (published by Sports Direct)
  4. buster.
    Thank's Pete ! I tried to contact a Newcastle fan a few months ago from a contact address in a fanzine of some kind (IIRC 'The Mag') but didn't get a reply. I'll look to try a bit harder this time. As for the username, it may well have come from the Newcastle reference but my memory couldn't swear on it. In fact, when I think about it....it was back at the end of 2012 when I first tried to get info from Newcastle messageboards and there is a thread on the subject from that time on FF.
  5. buster.

    Why???

    buster. replied to Darthter's topic in Rangers Chat

    Going back to the beginning of what we know, why would greedy low life sp.ivs handover half the retail rights with control over finance and the stadium renaming rights for a pound ? Why would Llambias be sent up to help Green sell a 'potential deal' that would bring in 'lots of money' when the deal had already been done for a pound coin between Ashley and the Green 'consortium' ? Why would Stockbridge sign off on KBA invoices (Llambias involved in Keith Bishop PR) for services unknown back in December 2012 ?
  6. buster.
    IMO I think any peaceful protests need to put into question the wider Ashley MO as being representative of much of what many think is wrong with UKPLC aswell as potential and more direct effects to the SD turnover. There is a window prior to the parlimentary questions that Ashley may have to face, always taking into account that we are in an election year.
  7. buster.
    There are other possible avenues that could be explored in an attempt to widen any action, off the top of my head............ 1. Are there any similar likeminded Newcastle Utd groups ? 2. ex- USC employees 3. Protesters re. Zero hours contracts. 4. General potential protest groups who dislike the style of corporatism employed by Ashley. 5. Attempt to carry momentum and focus general social/economic discontent on SD/MA.
  8. buster.
    Well done on this Frankie and to all others who sent the RFB their concerns on the executive management of RIFC/TRFC. Not forgetting the RFB themselves for choosing to represent the Fans rather than protect others. We await reaction
  9. buster.
    Yes, it's tinfoil hat territory.
  10. buster.
    The Douglas Park statement helps clarify facts and re-enforces strong doubts over the board acting in all of the RIFC shareholders interests. Rather, that they are there to protect and enhance the interests of Sports Direct/Mike Ashley.
  11. buster.
    Absolutely,......They can choose FAN representation or Corporate interests protection (even in silence). The elephant in the room being that those Corporate interests aren't even in favour of Rangers.
  12. buster.
    Good effort GD ! I'm reminded of the party that those involved with the CW takeover had in London back in June 2011. Like them, you can imagine those presently involved laughing in our faces. That e-mail from Shackleton is basically taking the pish.
  13. buster.
    Hope you don't mind but have quoted your OP and advanced the idea to FF.
  14. buster.
    What is important IMO is any legal advice received regards 'related party transactions' etc and how that may or may not influence matters going forward.
  15. buster.
    Although I think the RFB have been set-up/designed so as not to be able to trouble the RIFC boardroom on such political matters, it comes down to the individual representatives, how strongly they feel about the ongoing executive management and the volume of feedback they receive, especailly the extraordinary situation where the board of RIFC seem to be more interested in SD interests. As a fans board, they face a similar question of potential conflict. Do the Rangers FANS board decide to represent the majority fan opinion or will they be more interested in protecting RIFC(SD) interests? Extraordinary circumstances may require an 'extraordinary response'.
  16. buster.
    Yes, you'd expect statements from various people/groups but you'd also expect that they'd need time to consider their initial response carefully.
  17. buster.
    For far too long, energy and focus has been diverted towards false or inconsequential battles when the real enemy has been within. When you have that cancer borrowing away inside you for more than a decade then it threatens your existence. When the treatment administered is to actually to introduce more virulent forms of a toxic disease then survival in a normal state is unlikely.
  18. buster.
    Llambias and Leach at Ibrox yesterday. .
  19. buster.
    I'd imagine that Ashley will now try and woo the 3 Bears so as to to avoid the EGM. Just offer them 'enough' to make it interesting but retain control. A considerable amount of money would be required by any new executive management team post General Meeting and therein is a large poison pill which might make it easier to accept any Ashley offer. If this were to happen then it's Sports Direct FC and a soulless football club. I only hope that there are sufficient grounds for challanging the RIFC board re. related party transactions going back to 2012 and if so, that there is a will to go down that path.
  20. buster.
    No surprise, usual Ashley MO in action. The legal question has to be if the RIFC board are acting in the best interests of Rangers or Sports Direct. EGM: Vote the incumbent board off Money needed to get out of SD clutches and then some more. Meanwhile, not a penny more.
  21. buster.
    Do they spell phycopath as thickopath in North American English ?
  22. buster.
    31st of January is a Saturday Anyone know when exactly the window ends for the SPFL?
  23. buster.
    Unless you recognise your own fundamental mistakes you never learn from them. Quite apart from the natural partisan reaction and view on another set of supporters, we have to acknowledge our own failings or what happens is, you remain susceptible to repeating your mistake. Being able to read doesn't mean that you won't be fooled. In fact, being able to read has proved to be a disadvantage for many.
  24. buster.

    SoS new info

    buster. replied to BEARGER's topic in Rangers Chat

    We can only hope that any current police investigations into the sale of assets (2012) and/or events in and around the IPO are comprehensive and successful.
  25. buster.

    SoS new info

    buster. replied to BEARGER's topic in Rangers Chat

    I wonder if Derek Llambias is a major shareholder in KBPR Ltd.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.