Jump to content

 

 

buster.

  • Posts

    14,139
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    110

Everything posted by buster.

  1. Will be interesting to see how we cope with the new pitch dimensions. Have had a few days to work accordingly, at least we should have prepared accordingly. Three points are more important than the Cup replay IMO so all attention on Alloa.
  2. Bluedell Thanks for taking the time to write up an impartial and educated analysis on that statement !
  3. A little humour
  4. It might be poor grammar and/or wording on my part but the two directors give their own description/explanation in the statement in Frankie's post above.
  5. Shouldn't they have told the RF board about this or included it in their electoral literature so as to let voters know what their plans were ? Aren't their rules within the RF about directors of other incorporated fans groups standing for election ? On top of the controversial circumstances on how they left RST when is it anyone will be able to trust anything they do or say. They may be free to do whatever they want but who is going to follow that type of Machiavellian leadership ? #Discredited_IMO
  6. As Motherwell manager in 2005 and ICT manager in 2011 I thought he particularly enjoyed and celebrated end of season wins against Celtic that were big factors in us winning the titles.
  7. With the likes of Butcher I think it is more the deep seated beliefs formed whilst a centre-half in a different era rather than anything sinister. The media will lap anything up that provokes controversy, discussion and revenue.
  8. From FF Re. the 'Rangers Independent Fans Consortium' Dr Scott Reid who is apparently on the RF Board, but isn't standing for re-election, has tweeted Mark Dingwall telling him that neither Graham Campball or Ronnie Johnston had informed the Board members of RF that they were forming what appears to be a provisional vehicle for a breakaway Consortium.
  9. For a little balance, the four clean sheets in a row for the FIRST TIME this season should also be mentioned. There is an insatiable thirst in the media and in some of the support to focus on negatives and what if scenarios.
  10. If you want real change you surely don't go with those who helped provide what you want to change from. This is currently all a bit nasty but it's reality and we can only hope for something positive coming out the other end of the process that can be built upon.
  11. Thanks for coming on and clarifying Greg, good Luck !
  12. A real danger from what without alternative explanation appears to be Machiavellian like politics is that many supporters simply get sickened and withdraw their support from any group.
  13. This line about not appealing because of the tweets posted by Tav is ridiculous. Partick Thistle know fine well any appeal was destined for failure, nor does their manager judge Higginbotham worthy of a start. ie. Thistle were never going to throw 1,000 sterling into the bin.
  14. Thank's for the info Frankie. Acrimonious division has been a big part of the support's problem and was very much encouraged from back in the Sir Duped days and taken advantage of by Jack Irvine on behalf of numerous clients. So to hear that what I think the supporter in the stand thought or generally understood to be a push towards healing those divisions with a proposed merger has 'secret' or undelcared moves in the background that would essentially continue a divide is alarming. They should come out and explain their intentions because it's the 'secret' undeclared nature of this that lends itself to the verb 'alarm'. ------------------------------------------------------- Apparently the two gentlemen who are named as directors of RIFCLtd were those who caused 'a stir' when leaving the RST and it seems won't be happy until they get THEIR way. The term 'team-players' has been employed on this thread on several occasions and you have to doubt that Graham Campbell and Ronnie Johnston can be catorgorised as such. edit Now see the other shell company.........
  15. Another shelf company !! You shake your head and despair.......
  16. Both directors (RIFCLtd) and candidates provide a twitter account on their candidate details Can't seem to find the Graham Campbell account but the Ronnie Johnston comes up. I don't have a twitter account but if someone who has would like to ask him about RIFCLtd,.... his twitter page is here 'https://twitter.com/rj1872'...........handle or whatever you call it '@rj1872' There is also a twitter page for RF candidates.........https://twitter.com/RFcandidate
  17. That may be, back in the day I saw many hefty challenges that the referee didn't blow for. Today there are still some but way less because of the different rules.
  18. - Aggressive approach with Studs leading - Contact above the knee - Lucky to avoid serious injury Haud yer wheesht Higginbotham and stop making a Jeremy Hunt of yourself.
  19. I wouldn't disagree that it is unpleasant. I just hope that a workable vehicle comes out of the other end with people in charge who are competent 'team players' pulling in the same positive direction and not the Machiavellian selfish agendas of individuals and back-stabbing politics we have become accustomed to. I take the simple view that to look forward and change positively, it isn't a good idea to return the same people who have been so involved with problems in the past.
  20. 1987 Rangers v Dynamo Kiev
  21. Yes, the two directors and RF election candidates could simply explain.
  22. Google: A person in accordance with whose directions or instructions the directors of a company are accustomed to act eg. Sandy Easdale was at times considered by some to act as one / RIFC (company) edit. Bluedell's example is better. Easdale might have been a go between.
  23. Google: A person in accordance with whose directions or instructions the directors of a company are accustomed to act eg. Sandy Easdale was at times considered by some to be one / RIFC (company)
  24. The questions of why incorporate RIFCLtd (see other thread for details) and what is it intended for is one that the two directors and candidates for this election really need to answer.
  25. Some of it may be OTT (as in sliding into abuse) but some is very relevant as you look back in history. Nor has BH played particularly 'nice' in his campaign. This thread is about a specific issue and isn't to "attack", it's about this recently incorporated RIFCLtd and looking for clarity on it or anything similar.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.