Jump to content

 

 

compo

  • Posts

    17,757
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    57

Posts posted by compo

  1. 2 minutes ago, CammyF said:

    Key points according to The Sun 

     

    • Gers accuse chief executive Neil Doncaster of holding back key information from clubs and being ‘the guiding hand’ who determined the league’s actions.
    • They claim the SPFL could be liable for up to £10million in refunds to broadcasters by ending the season prematurely.
    • Gers say Doncaster suggested the SPFL handed over a sponsorship deal to Sky Sports which was significantly below the league’s market value.
    • They question why SPFL lawyer Rod McKenzie issued four ‘cease and desist’ requests to Ibrox chairman Douglas Park - insisting he blocked their bid for a new resolution.
    • They query a letter sent to UEFA outlining how Scotland’s clubs wanted the season over before any vote had taken place.
    • And they insist there are still unanswered questions on why Dundee performed a voting U-turn.

     

    The plot thickens 

  2. I suppose the club have realised that things might never be the same after this virus sponsors will be spending less prize money meagre as it is will be less European competition may have to be shortened less matches less money again lower money on offer this wont have as much an impact on the so called giants but we are now anything but a big club these days so we have to make hay while the sun shines we might even see the capacity of stadiums slashed .

    Look at the greedy league or the English premiership all that money the clubs have raked in over the years and I would bet not one has a healthy balance sheet probably the opposite because they have all been mismanaged for year thinking the gravy train would never stop well it looks like its been derailed and lots of then down south are in panic mode .

    :rfc: 

  3. 59 minutes ago, 26th of foot said:

    Really, I don't want to write this; BUT :

     

    Loyalty?

     

    Reference Bar'72, I penned in an earlier piece that I have been a member since day one. There appears to be a recognition/realisation the Bar'72 seats are some of the best in the Stadium. The club want to maximise revenue. Corporate elements have targeted the seats. 

     

    We received an e-mail telling us of proposed Bar'72 improvements? Basically, a complimentary pint/pie/programme, a Q and A with a former player conducted by an appointed MC, a lanyard and attached security clearance card, a designated bean counter, ...... etc. The rise will be 35%, my ticket will be £1,500; thus in cash terms, an increase of in excess of £350. Only when you accept and renew, you receive a PDF brochure. You are informed of a 7.5% loyalty reduction. Further, the increase for the next season will be even larger. Season 21/22 will cost me £2,400.

     

    There is a principle involved here. If you cannot afford either rise, you lose your seat. However, you are punished twice because the club will fit you in, where seats are available. We know there is a waiting list, and those seats available will be few, and mainly in areas of restricted views, poor viewing, and lets say either wing of the Club Deck. Many Bar'72 members are older, on fixed incomes, and would be unwilling to climb several flights of stairs.

     

    I don't think there is any point in raging at the injustices of the situation to the two girls tasked with Bar'72 administration? The decision making exists at a far higher level. 

     

    The club asks for loyalty, you comply, then they punish you twice for your

    The cost of failure is getting higher by the season 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.