crucible
-
Posts
386 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by crucible
-
If we are to believe Whyte is around and active which I don't, you can lock the gates before the SFA do it for us, scaremongering and dangerous rumourmongering on an epic scale, not what we need at this moment sometimes I wonder if we really need enemies.
-
You can"t correct me then, thanks.
-
I believe the recent resignations where at some time under MM's corporate governance, perhaps you can correct me.
-
Lots of people are alcoholics it doesn't make them bad people or unable to function.
-
Shouldn't we be considering MM's previous tenure and apparent lack of corporate governance.
-
14th June 2012 Malcolm Murray appointed chairman, isn't he the alleged guru of the buzz saying "corporate governance" what happened to the corporate governance under his watch, when all sorts are said to have been going on ?
-
Are we to leave unchallenged blatant misrepresentation of fact by posters that suits one argument ?
-
You mean you don't know or don't want to know, the answer is plenty since our latest alleged saviour was involved, PM King and others were introduced as early as the first page, bit late putting your finger in the hole in the dyke
-
Truth is often stranger than fiction, especially when not one brass farthing is owed and PM couldn't find £500,000 from anywhere so he could gain excusitivity to pay ticketus money we don't owe, and borrow from these people we don't owe money too. The Blue Knights, with Ticketus as a partner, had appeared to be front-runner to take the club over. It had hoped to be named preferred bidder on Friday and was asked to provide a £500,000 non-refundable deposit for exclusivity. Murray told BBC Scotland that Ticketus was not prepared to provide this cash for the administrators on Friday and over the weekend he said it became clear that Ticketus had agreed a "substantially" better deal with Ng's group of investors. "We stand ready to complete our offer of 4 April which included a deal in principle with Ticketus. We still believe that a partnership with Ticketus represents the best opportunity of the club exiting administration via a CVA," said Murray.
-
Well at least we have confirmed that ticketus had and have no claim via the Administrators documents, although PM wanted to give them millions we didn't and dont owe them, then re-borrow millions a sort of reverse ponzy.
-
Ticketus 13.9 The Joint Administrators have continued to investigate the claims made by Ticketus in the administration. The evidence available to the Joint Administrators suggests that the claims made by Ticketus against the Company are unenforceable. The Joint Administrators have taken advice from both solicitors and counsel in both England and Scotland on the validity or otherwise of the claims. The advice received is to the effect that there are a number of grounds on which the claims can be disputed in full. Following the legal advice received, the Joint Administrators consider that the claims made by Ticketus should be rejected in full for voting purposes. Ticketus have been given notice of this decision.
-
We didn't and don't owe ticketus anything not one penny, however PM and his group believed they knew better than the administrators, seems they didn't and far from it no more needs said on that.
-
Seems PM supporters fail to realise that failure brings it own rewards or brickbats and he has failed on too many fronts, I would hazard that is why many are very wary of being bitten by that failure.
-
Looks like the major shareholders are going to appoint and the minor shareholders are going to have to lump it or like it. "through a consensus amongst major shareholders, which can then be considered by all shareholders"
-
Perhaps if we had psuedo fan bodies been given the media platform their membership deserves we might get somewhere rather than it being inferred that these small groups speak for all, which is nothing like the truth and distorts how things are perceived by the guy in the street. They all of them should be disbanded and we should go back to the days of one Rangers Supporters association, we may then see more balance in how things are reported and viewed. As for say what you like about DK or PM i have said it and will say it again, they failed us before nothing more nothing less.
-
I see you resort to posting gibberish when your nonsense is disassembled.
-
What today's actions don't do is explain the reluctance of PM or DK to stand up to SDM and his recklessness, in PM'S case the very essence of a NED's duties, no amount of deflection or spin will cover that failure.
-
Honourable men resign when they realise they are but rubber stamp puppets.
-
As for the style of figures you would have to ask Boss, though why you would invoke celtic to deflect from your nonsensical assertions is for you to know, you obviously are unable to raise any validity for your propaganda I will leave you to be bothered. The hollowness of your support is complete.
-
So you have nothing no bona fides to back up your assertion which was the very simple request I made, while the required bona fides that discredit your claim were published by a knowledgeable source in another place. Your claim that PM is therefore OK is shown up for the nonsense and propaganda that it is. The below is the figures from that knowledgeable post by Boss for your perusal and elucidation. Net debt at 30 June 2007 £16,542,000 Paul Murray appointed director 20 September 2007 Net debt at 30 June 2008 £21,559,000 Net debt at 30 June 2009 £31,118,000 Net debt at 30 June 2010 £27,074,000 (last audited accounts) Sometimes facts are annoying.
-
Can you provide bona fide audited figures to back your claim up, I saw figures from audited accounts posted by Admin on RM an accountant I believe, that showed the debt increased under Paul Murray and others. Are you able to refute that claim and audited figures without contradiction.
-
Anyone associated with the SDM regime should be nowhere near the boardroom not least of all for the way they allowed SDM to run the club into debt without a murmur or resignation.
-
And I will suggest that the headline story is utter tosh as is normal for that particular rag, strange how DK says private thoughts yet the rag claims to know them which we now know to be untrue.
-
Guess this one has been put to bed.
-
I can't find anything to justify the headline, is it in some other article can someone point in the right direction.