ranger_syntax

The subjectivity is precisely why people want to discuss it.

My thoughts on the article are limited although not limited to what I have posted here. Recall that was what you specifically said about your own thoughts. I'm just taking you at your word.

You did share it on a discussion forum. If your thoughts are as limited as you suggest then fair enough. The use of the term interesting does suggest that there is more to say. Although, admittedly, it is a widely misused term.

You don't need my permission. I thought that you would want to discuss the article.

But what was interesting about it?

Funny. I made an exception and actually read it. I didn't see anything of interest that I couldn't get from watching the match.

Perverse incentives exist. This is worse than previously imagined.

There are a variety of ways to share the plain text of an article. Here is one more: https://txtify.it

https://txtify.it/https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/61540598

I don't get it. What do you like about this article?

Not really. He has a couple of very obvious weaknesses. Very happy for people to continue to overlook them until he is sold though.

I was also sat in the North stand but thankfully I was far enough from the Hearts supporters. No risk of flying objects for me. It wasn't all plain sailing though. Early on in the match I heard some deeply offensive language emanating from somewhere further back. Initially the fellow in question was urging Rangers to 'recycle it'. Then as the match developed I heard repeated reference to 'big Shirley'. Shameful scenes.

Why would anyone want to listen to that?

Nice way to end the season.

Rangers 1 Hearts 0 First goal scorer: Tavernier

Yes, lets end with a win for a trophy. That will make it easier to start next season well.

Bamboo is an odd choice, no?

Given that we have another opportunity a win on Wednesday certainly was not required. Fortunately the team, management et al don't share the defeatist outlook.

I'm suggesting that we have lots of room for improvement. Is there a path to the conference league final that doesn't involve a regression?

This notion is everywhere and it is not true. If we start to participate in the champions league group stages often enough then other good chances will come. The team needs to keep working hard though. This has to be inspiration for further improvements.

Who knew that simple questions could prove so difficult?

Yes, yes, reaching the final has impoverished Rangers. Few understand this.

Guaranteed to be a popular choice for anyone that reads red top newspapers.

Prior to his return, in February, I would have moved him on. Now I'm not so sure. He should only be moved on if we know we have a better alternative. Maybe we need a similar player to alternate with him instead.

No problems for me but I was driving and so well hydrated beforehand. I was in the lower tier so I didn't have to cling on to a steep slope. The stalls behind us kept opening and closing throughout normal time. You could see that stocks needed to be constantly replenished as it only had some small fridges.