ranger_syntax

The Record are just making stuff up.

Sounds like good craic.

Sounds like good craic.

Good point. That was such a long time ago. I think I had forgot about it.

Oh no. Not that garbage about an assistant with local knowledge again. I'll need to dust off all of my anti Barry Ferguson talking points yet again.

I will take the fellow from Hearts. I don't know if he would be any good. I'm just sure that his name isn't Knutsen.

I think that the ubiquity of these 'values' makes them worthless as part of any individual club brand or identity.

Are there any football clubs that would not recite an equivalent message?

Looks like some modern football clubs to me. Just like any other.

If your brand can be anything then it is nothing.

I guess we can rule out tradition then.

People find it difficult because it is painful to accept that Rangers is a modern football club like any other.

Modern life is rubbish.

Jesus Christ.

Funny, I thought you would come back about the hard work bit.

That stuff is all long gone. I seem to remember some fellow saying that the team that drinks together wins together. Maybe it disappeared some time before then.

Have you been in a coma since 2012?

Why is it important to be able to speak to them? Was the Easdale board removed as a result of some persuasive chat?

I think that I'm right to say that shareholders get a vote regardless of board member opinions. This board will be as accountable as any other board in any other similarly structured company. Rangers fans, in general, are not holding the board to account at present. That does not mean that the board is unaccountable.

I don't know. Perhaps the board think that it is a waste of time. Club1872 will just have to cast a vote like all of the other shareholders.

One of these things is unlike the others. The board are accountable to shareholders.

It costs time and money like everything else.

If the directors change their mind, after explaining, then their credibility suffers. Why risk that to placate fans? If the board are being asked to tell us things that are neither controversial nor unexpected then it is completely pointless. Demanding that the board do something completely pointless is dumb.

Quite.