ranger_syntax

Didn't think to check first?

Or when nobody communicates with us. I think we should all thank St Johnstone for communicating how we could spend our money.

We should do a tifo that creates the illusion of real pyros.

@Malangsob post that somewhere else.

Slack throughout the team. It should have been an easy three points.

Rangers 1 Celtic 0 First goal scorer: Tavernier

I would much rather have Jack and Arfield than Tillman and Sakala.

A draw is no good for the league table. A draw is ok for the manager though.

A couple of points about this are interesting. Firstly, it's futile to highlight the hypocrisy. There is a hierarchy and we are not at the top. That problem can't be dealt with by pointing at hypocrisy. Secondly I would like to know what kind of advice and support the Broomloan Collective offer to people. Anybody here know?

I don't notice much criticism at the matches. I don't even bother to criticise him there either. I think that people don't care too much because he hardly gets on the pitch.

Matondo is destroying the reputation of all players that have played in Germany and Belgium. Scouts are now starting to acknowledge that it is possible to play in Germany and Belgium while having absolutely nothing to offer.

Rangers 4 Motherwell 0 First goal scorer: Morelos

Sounds good. Presumably he will be paying Rangers for the opportunity.

Aberdeen 0 Rangers 1 First goal scorer: Tavernier

The first half tactic of Kent dropping deep did not work at all. I'm not sure what else Beale changed at half time but we were able to keep Hibernian pushed back. That was helpful in two ways. Firstly the pressure led to goals. Secondly the pressure reduced the likelihood of our hopeless defence getting involved in the game again.

Rangers 1 Hibernian 0 First goal scorer: Tavernier

It will be Davis or McGregor.

I'm communicating the futility of your request. Rather than adapt to reality you just keep sobbing. Funny, is it not?

As pointed out repeatedly this just a way to get people to shut up.

I was too busy to watch this yesterday. Judging by the scoreline we are now the best team in the world.

In the case of Weir it is quite possible that experience as a technical director is not sufficient preparation to be managing director at Rangers. If we are being honest we will admit that he springs to mind because of his previous spells at the club and little else. In the case of Bennett he may not have any interest in committing to any more than he is doing at present.

As far as I can tell that depends on the company. I know that some will apply the terms arbitrarily. I think that chief executive is a strategic role whereas managing director is about the day to day management and implementation. I say this having only ever encountered chief executives and never once a managing director. I would guess that a few here have encountered many of both so I'm happy to be corrected.

What is it about Bennett, or Weir, that would make either one a good fit for the particular role of managing director?