ranger_syntax

I'm not looking for him to be sacked. This is based entirely on the sunk cost fallacy.

While you join in.

Don't complain though because, well, er, Celtic fans complained about some stuff at some point. Where did it ever get them?

Looks like many in our support have been well conditioned.

Nonsense.

Not a competitive match.

Nonsense.

Probably the best we could do at the time.

We've gifted another goal to Celtic today. We had no coherent pattern of attack other than the ball over the top. I think I'm right to say that Cantwell and Raskin have yet to beat Celtic in a competitive match.

Rangers 2 Celtic 1 First goal scorer: Matondo

Not sure you are enjoying it. Back on page two. Great value for money!

Is Morelos still a free agent?

Told you already Brighton is zero 'value for money' to us. Have you considered supporting Espanyol instead of Rangers? (Espanyol hardly ever play in Europe so you will save loads of money)

Quite a funny idea to compare the prices then.

I wouldn't pay 75p to watch Brighton.

What is all this three separate payment rubbish?

You enhance your reputation by playing at the highest level possible. The coefficient is a means to an end. That is to say you only want a high coefficient because it helps you to play at a higher level.

Yes. Yes. Yes. Not sure what you mean by "football rewards".

In relative terms we need to outperform the other Scotch teams. In absolute terms we should be in the Champions league group stage or playing in the Europa league after Christmas.

If we finish third in this group then our chances of winning the Conference are zero.

Third place is failure.

Doesn't matter if the same team starts two matches in a row. P.S.V. are much better than Celtic. That result tells us nothing about the coming match.

I think we could play worse and still beat Aris Limassol.

We should be finishing in the top two.