ranger_syntax

I think you only need something like 10-15% to call an E.G.M.

The idea of an SPL2 fast track is terrible. I'm really surprised to see support for it among Rangers fans. It's obviously tempting but a moment of reflection should make anyone realise that it would ruin Scottish football even more than it already has been. We all turn up to the football to see a contest where the best team wins. Fast tracking any team abandons the idea that teams should progress according to sporting merit. It reduces the Scottish league system to a matter of who has the most fans. That is to say no longer even pretending to be about what happens on the pitch. Why should any supporters turn up in those circumstances? I'd understand if supporters, of all teams, stopped turning up altogether. The SPL was formed as an attempt to protect a select group of clubs from failure. It has undoubtedly been bad for Scottish football. Falkirk were denied promotion. I didn't quite realise it at the time but that was a disgrace. Forced to abandon Brockville Park, near the centre of the town, for a bleak, soulless and lop sided echo chamber. Airdrieonians and Partick Thistle also invested in stadia to the detriment of both clubs. The meddling that the SPL has brought Scottish football amounts to little more than vandalism. It's important that we all remember what the game is supposed to be about and avoid being fooled by incredible notions of the greater good.

The question is how much openness are supporters actually entitled to?

The criterion should be competence. As Frankie mentions we can't make any decisions without knowing what people intend to do.

I followed you a while back. But I had taken the trouble to read your tweets and could tell that you're not a bad egg.

@ranger_syntax

What do you think that the difference is between our various owners and those of clubs who make it work?

I agree with some of this but not all. I'm not sure he will be a great signing but I think he will probably do well enough over the next two years. You are right to point out his contrast to Templeton, McKay and Little. I think that this is why McCoist wants to sign him. He wants the option to play a big guy up front. I think that this is why he signed Kyle last year too. When he signed Kyle I was surprised as I thought McCulloch would play that role but I think we can all see that when McCulloch plays it will probably be at the back or in midfield. You also mention his resale value. In an ideal world we would only sign a young player who fulfils his potential before we sell him for a nice profit. In reality the manager needs to balance that against the need to achieve short term goals. When you consider that alongside the constraints that we still face in the transfer market is it any wonder that we will make signings that are imperfect? I'm not sure that it is a big problem either.

A player who understands the importance of hard work and continued effort. I hope it catches on.

Great password that they gave Craig Whyte: Rangers1! Although I think Craig Whyte has supplied Charlotte with this information it would be no surprise to find that the data room had been hacked also.