ranger_syntax

Not sure why it is difficult to judge if it causes success but can easily judge that it isn't a hindrance. The reason I ask is that I think it is unfair for a club to have additional teams, thus additional revenue streams, in the senior league. In addition to that it warps the competition. The league competitions should be the end, not a means to an end.

To what extent is the success of Spanish football caused by having B teams playing in the lower divisions? Does it have any negative effect on Spanish football?

Can't wait.

Rangers First does that?

It is almost as if the gutter press have stories on standby for quiet news weeks.

Surely some interesting questions to ask. For example, if Scottish football is left out you might wonder how independent, of Rangers, Celtic's business plan was.

I wonder if people in Scotland will want to watch the Champions League if Karl-Heinz Rummenigge has his way?

Log out of all social media. Use your vote.

Is this the Bayern model? I wonder if people in Scotland will continue to fork out cash to TV companies to watch the Champions League if Karl-Heinz Rummenigge has his way?

Legend is a bit of a silly term to use. I've always thought that it meant an old story that was partly true and partly exaggerated/made up. To call him a legend would certainly be an exaggeration. He has been a decent player.

A home town referee? Bringing the game into disrepute, Kallum?

I'm rather partial to the club.

Bogbrush, meet Bogbrush. Bogbrush, this is Bogbrush. Great stuff guys!

Outwith the first few matches that he has played I've only noticed praise for him in this forum. I'm not sure the support is really divided on this issue.

It is good that the obvious problems are being acknowledged. It is pathetic that sanction is deferred for 18 months.

Didn't realise until someone told me today but it is also a team that recently let Dundee United score five.

There was no winner today. The negativity comes from the realisation that, despite some improvement, we are nowhere near good enough to achieve what we want.

Incredible. That's four chances they have blown.

It won't stop misuse. It would reduce it compared to unlimited challenges. No thanks. Blah, blah, blah, and on and on and on. Why not have a committee that can quickly convene and overrule the two video referees? It's a simple game. Lets keep it simple.

This is one of the funniest posts that I have ever read.

Not sure about that. How much money did Hearts spend, compared to us, last year?

Rugby is a different, slower sport. Tennis is a completely different sport that already stops and starts between each and every point. Correct decisions are desirable but not necessary. I don't want the game to be stopped while the referee checks the video. I don't want teams at matches with more cameras to have a better chance of correct decisions. I don't want breaks in play to become a tool for managers to interrupt the flow of an opponent. Footballers already appeal every foul like little children. Imagine how bad it would be if a video replay was available at the time.

Of course he will. I have no idea why you are asking this.

My season ticket money will be made available.

That's the spirit. All together now . . .