ranger_syntax

Comments like that are embarrassing.

The anatomy of an article about the vacant management post at Rangers: 1. Mention a former manager 2. Mention Billy Davies 3. Mention a former player 4. Enlist services of 'rent-a-gob' former player 5. Squeeze in silly request for a job from said former player Am I being unfair or have we really read this article a million times before?

Was it Benjamin Franklin who once said:

Warburton failed to get us into Europe at the first attempt.

This is great news!

Great end to the match. Just as well because it was terrible until Motherwell scored. Didn't see anything from Toral today that impressed me.

I would take that for him. We could, for example, buy three players for ~£1 million each and make a significant improvement to the team.

I think we can do better with the money that we have. Money doesn't guarantee success either.

Anybody care to paste the contents in here?

The sooner Matt Gilks leaves the sooner we can speculate about signing him again . . .

A fine publication indeed. I have no doubt that a well read audience, such as you will find in here, will be very familiar with it.

As I think I said last time; we need better players that this to match our ambitions. Might be good value, might be good guys to have in the squad but everyone knows we need better than this.

Doubt this would cause any arguments.

I'm glad we are all agreed that Windass was not playing wingback. All I was trying to say was that Tavernier needs replaced and that Hodson wasn't good enough to do it. No idea why anyone thought we had to talk about all that other stuff.

Windass at wingback?

Windass at wingback?

Windass at wingback?

I think there is a reason that he can't keep Tavernier out of the team. I guess Warburton thinks that Hodson's attacking play creates a different problem for the team. I think we'll need to bring someone from outside rather than promote a squad player.

Sure, but as I said, I think right back and midfielder are the priority. Tavernier is proving to be far too much of a weak link. In midfield we are missing three players through sacking and long term injury. We've reached the point where Tavernier, not a midfielder, is getting played in midfield. Even Halliday, ostensibly a midfielder, looks below the required standard. Given that I can't think of a time when we were short of players for the front line then I would not prioritise a new striker.

I wonder how this compares to the reaction when Lafferty dived against Aberdeen?

I wouldn't dream of expressing an opinion. Not everybody got the chance to see him play . . .

I don't think striker is the priority. We have loads of them. We need a right back and someone to fill the gap left in midfield.

The marking for both opposition goals was pathetic. Improving the defence must be a priority.

I feel like this has been discussed before. We already spend quite a bit more than Aberdeen yet we are only two points ahead of them. I think that most of the problem lies elsewhere.

People don't deserve gratitude, or praise, for respecting a minute silence.