ranger_syntax

That would help. I hope we don't lose any of the other eligible players to injury.

It's certainly reassuring to think that this team only lost 2-0. I wouldn't take any of those players back.

It's a good point. Throughout the season the team has shown that it can be poor defensively and also, sometimes, struggle to score. It looks like the attack has been significantly improved by the 3 players brought in. I think that we're also starting to create better chances. I think that the defence has not really improved though. We are still benefiting from keeping a lot of possession. If we manage to control possession then I think we will win it. A win would be very important as I imagine season ticket sales would get a major boost.

Not another Zelalem thread . . .

Great game. I was expecting it to be difficult but we beat them easily. At half time I thought that Dundee could still get back into it. An excellent second goal killed it. Forrester looked like he would be of little use to begin with but he's completely changed that now. Looking forward to the next round now and then maybe on to an unusual treble.

Yes, well, that is why I mentioned prospective MPs. Not sure if the public, in the UK, have ever been forced to pay for a state broadcaster though.

Good for you. I hope that more will take the time to do so.

Non payers need not worry. If someone does pay the licence then complaining to the BBC in London is certainly more beneficial than complaining on a football forum. Complaining to prospective MPs would also be worthwhile if you want to change the way that the BBC operates.

How many of you have sent a complaint to the BBC in London? I've not, but I'm not a licence fee payer.

Good stuff tonight. Hopefully we will see that for the rest of the season. I didn't really think there was much of a chance that we would get caught after the weekend. After tonight there is no chance.

There are a few SNP voters in here no doubt. Does this make anyone reconsider who to vote for?

Not sure why it is difficult to judge if it causes success but can easily judge that it isn't a hindrance. The reason I ask is that I think it is unfair for a club to have additional teams, thus additional revenue streams, in the senior league. In addition to that it warps the competition. The league competitions should be the end, not a means to an end.

To what extent is the success of Spanish football caused by having B teams playing in the lower divisions? Does it have any negative effect on Spanish football?

Can't wait.

Rangers First does that?

It is almost as if the gutter press have stories on standby for quiet news weeks.

Surely some interesting questions to ask. For example, if Scottish football is left out you might wonder how independent, of Rangers, Celtic's business plan was.

I wonder if people in Scotland will want to watch the Champions League if Karl-Heinz Rummenigge has his way?

Log out of all social media. Use your vote.

Is this the Bayern model? I wonder if people in Scotland will continue to fork out cash to TV companies to watch the Champions League if Karl-Heinz Rummenigge has his way?

Legend is a bit of a silly term to use. I've always thought that it meant an old story that was partly true and partly exaggerated/made up. To call him a legend would certainly be an exaggeration. He has been a decent player.

A home town referee? Bringing the game into disrepute, Kallum?

I'm rather partial to the club.

Bogbrush, meet Bogbrush. Bogbrush, this is Bogbrush. Great stuff guys!

Outwith the first few matches that he has played I've only noticed praise for him in this forum. I'm not sure the support is really divided on this issue.