ranger_syntax

If I wanted to troll I would mention the promise to leave it at that all the way back on post #2359 I think that we will see many more posts from our esteemed contributor but that, alas, is just conjecture.

You might as well command the sun not to shine.

We already have plenty of critics. Why does he feel the need to join in?

It is not the Rangers Observer's ability to critique that you need to worry about.

We have yet to demonstrate that we are better than them. A match here and there doesn't count for much. Our points total does.

Sure to say something in his book if he is. Anybody read it?

Why do people think that tabloid scribblers get 6 figure salaries?

I read that Paul Hartley was interviewed. Any idea why Hearts have opted for Levein rather than Hartley?

Rossiter has not showed that he is far better. I think that Jack has. Jack is one of the best players in the team this season alongside Alves and Morelos.

I'm getting a bit fed up of seeing smoke bombs. It seems to be more frequent now. People might not make such a fuss if it was something rare.

Because people continue to pay for it.

We can't count on the opposition keeper making a mistake like that every week. It looks like we can count on Morelos though. He showed the right attitude to get straight back up and chase the ball again.

I certainly agree with the first part.

That's a good win under the circumstances. Good to see Morelos continuing to score. We need a few more like him. We made lots of unforced errors though. We should never have let Ross County play so much football at our end in the second half.

I would prefer to see Peña rather than Kranjčar. I would prefer to see Herrera rather than Miller. So Miller and Kranjčar are destined to play brilliantly.

Jason Holt on the wing.

No. It would not be.

What does this mean?

Titter . . . I can't believe that Herr Berliner is going to argue about language and reasoned debate. After all who brought in quotes from another forum deriding Pedro's critics as the Playstation generation. But back to the point of substance. Who signed half a dozen players who hardly know what sort of football awaits them in Scotland? Reasoned debate plz. No excuses.

I agree with all of this. The frustration comes from a few obvious sources though. Mostly because these are matches that we should really be winning. We were prevented by the referee in the last match. In this match we were not good enough to break down the Hearts defence and we should have been. As you correctly point out Windass was far better than his opponent again. I don't know why he is being criticised this year. If there is any criticism from yesterday it is the decision to keep Miller on. I think that started to hinder the performance of other parts of the team. Wallace for example.

But in essence, you look through this thread and once again it appears to be a whole kindergarden of spoilt brats who simply can't get their head around the fact that we are far from the finished article, have a completely new team and are less than half a handful of games into the season. You have to wonder if the admin over on the German board was still in the stadium after 75 minutes . . . . . . if so then Herr Admin would have heard complaints from supporters that are not exactly the Playstation generation.

I should add that I imagine (hope) that Peña will replace Miller.

I think it is easy to see where we go from here. The gaping hole in the team is an attacking midfielder. If Peña gets fit and into the team then perhaps things will come together. To me it looks like this is what the manager is hoping for.

Moult is not the solution to our problems.

We should have won that match. I don't understand the decision to take Dorrans off and leave Miller on. Miller hardly kicked a ball after that.