ranger_syntax

The attack showed the same problems as last year. Murphy, Windass and Morelos all continue to be sources of frustration. Hard to say if the defence is any good yet. It wasn't tested much and the only question mark, so far, is Goldson's passing. Some decent performances though. Middleton looks great and should hopefully displace either Murphy or Windass this season. Ejaria looks quite skillful although I can easily see him being a squad player. Flanagan looked solid and I expect him to remain first choice.

Does this really work? I can never see the tweets that I try to post.

smh

France 2 - 1 Croatia England 0 - 1 Belgium

A fine statement from the club. If we are creating a siege mentality then I know which side of the wall I want to be on.

France 2 - 3 Belgium Croatia 3 - 2 England

Morelos looks like he is in better shape.

France 1 - 2 Uruguay Russia 0 - 2 Croatia Sweden 1 - 2 England Brazil 2 - 1 Belgium

Why focus on the team 10 years ago? The counter example is any squad, over the last ten years, that is better than the current one. I would say that the squad in Walter Smith's last season was pretty good. The current squad will have it's work cut out to demonstrate that it is better than 10/11. Anyways, the headline is rubbish. It makes a big attention grabbing claim with no real justification contained in the article. Perfect to get the useful ones to circulate it.

The tweet set out to tell people about the orange order but it really tells us about Graham Spiers. Instead of using his platform to criticise the powerful he uses is to attack the powerless. The orange order is unpopular and enjoys almost no political support in Scotland. Any attack from a public figure is the equivalent of kicking a man when he is down. The fact that he body shames a dead man just hammers the point home. It couldn't be clearer what type of person he is; a bully.

France 2 - 1 Argentina Uruguay 2 - 1 Portugal Spain 1 - 2 Russia Croatia 3 - 0 Denmark Brazil 2 - 0 Mexico Belgium 3 - 0 Japan Sweden 2 - 0 Switzerland Colombia 1 - 3 England

Are you fed up reading about Phil or arguments over Jon Flanagan? Perhaps you will enjoy listening to this:

Never mind 3 at the back. Just today I was reading elsewhere. Someone suggested that we will have 3 up front. The discussion implied our star striker being pushed into another position.

Uruguay 1 - 2 Russia Saudi Arabia 0 - 1 Egypt Spain 2 - 0 Morocco Iran 0 - 3 Portugal Joker Denmark 1 - 2 France Australia 1 - 0 Peru Nigeria 2 - 1 Argentina Iceland 0 - 3 Croatia South Korea 0 - 2 Germany Mexico 1 - 0 Sweden Serbia 0 - 1 Brazil Switzerland 1 -0 Costa Rica Japan 1 - 0 Poland Senegal 2 - 3 Colombia England 2 - 1 Belgium Panama 0 - 1 Tunisia

You wouldn't. The figure quoted makes no sense.

Well, I think you may have missed something. Pretty sure Brazil/Costa Rica was my third correct score.

Looks like the stylesheet isn't loading. That could be for many reasons.

Is this the Brazil/Costa Rica match?

Maybe we could include Mark Lawrenson in the table. All those below 'Lawro', like me, can be considered pathetic losers. Gif unrelated

Russia 3 vs 1 Egypt Portugal 3 vs 0 Morocco Joker Uruguay 2 vs 0 Saudi Arabia Iran 0 vs 2 Spain Denmark 2 vs 1 Australia France 3 vs 1 Peru Argentina 2 vs 1 Croatia Brazil 2 vs 0 Costa Rica Nigeria 1 vs 2 Iceland Serbia 2 vs 0 Switzerland Belgium 3 vs 1 Tunisia South Korea 0 vs 2 Mexico Germany 1 v 2 Sweden England 3 vs 0 Panama Japan 1 vs 0 Senegal Poland 0 vs 1 Colombia

https://rangers.co.uk/news/galleries/training-gallery-65/

If all the people, who were somehow unsatisfied with Club1872, invested in some alternative fan ownership scheme would the sum exceed £1 million? gif unrelated