onevision

He was signed based on his performance against us but then so was davie cooper. i do however agree with you.

Lawyers will be rubbing their hands and clambering over each other to get a cut of this money pie. They will not give two jots if they don't have a chance of winning, they will take money from whomever wants to hand it over to fight any cause whether justified or not because that's what they do. Regarding us, if the time comes most will dig deep again to ensure we keep hold of our hard earned trophies.

Listened to the first call and turned off, all he tried to do was to get Jim Duffy to agree with the cheating word....JD stuck to his stance that in his opinion no cheating took place.

Happy enough with first half. just need to create a few decent goalscoring chances.

Correct Pete, maybe i should have just highlighted was it totally unintentional, i sure most of us are underestimating this clowns intelligence.

Surely their club must have administered these arrangements as taxable earnings need to be taxed at source, no?

Are you sure, really sure ? ....

Brilliant photo. welcome graham enjoy living the dream.

Nothing strange about it, we all know their REAL reason.

So basically this ruling just means the tax man gets a bigger cut from the money pot held then yes? end off.

Do we still have our fighting fund in place? We're gonna need it now.

We give the manager up to and including the first match against them. If we are in a position to still be competing to win the league then he stays, if not then he must go.

Foderingham 3 Tavernier 1 Bates 2 Cardoso 2 Wallace 1 Jack 2 Rossiter 2 Kranjcar 2 Candeias 1 Miller 2 Morelos 2 Subs : Dalcio 2 Windass minus 10 Herrera 2 I gave 2 to the folk i thought at least tried to influence the game, Windass gets minus 10 as he was involved in both their goals.

I bet that tit at the sfa will write to Rangers asking for an explanation into what is meant by WATP.

Am away fur a lie doon. ffs an absolute bampot.

maybe naw but green is green so right tae ban them.

Looks like most folk saw performances the same with obviously Kranjcar head and shoulder above the rest followed by Jack.

The best feature for an attractive girl is her face and although not ugly shes very ordinary.

Foderingham 6 Tavernier 5 Bates 6 Cardoso 6 Wallace 5 Jack 7 Holt 6 Kranjcar 8 Dalcio 5 Waghorn 4 Miller 6 Subs : Candeias 5 Rossiter 5 Morelos 3

You could apply that theory to all players and positions John. The truth is Halliday is just not good enough.

It can still be done from the newco perspective though.

I'm sure you will find we are being kept in the dark with how money is divided regarding old stock. Remember this stock has been laying around since the beginning of last season and probably stored in Sports Direct warehouse so i'm not parting with any cash until i'm convinced i'm wrong. Also why are the tops on sale at £20? surely the club would benefit a whole lot more if sold at the RRP and i'm sure fans would still purchase at the full price, something not sitting right with me.

From what little of the match i saw i could tell that Alves will be a huge step up in class, his distribution was great and always looked to make a forward pass rather sideways.

Aye, passwords, although necessary, can be an absolute nightmare....

Agree mostly with other have stated. The password change can be a bother. Regarding stats, I think a good addition would be to introduce a page where after each match members get the opportunity to rate each players performance and as we don't all see a match the same with differing opinions on player performances give the poster a chance to back up his ratings with some factual evidence. This would also allow us to have our own Gersnet player of the year at the end of the season.