onevision

I'll never grow tired of watching that goal. The build up play all the way through to the sublime finish, absolutely superb.

Rangers 3 St Johnstone 1 FGS = Garner

137 = David Vine 138 = The singer fae Divine Comedy 136 = The baldy Mitchell guy fae Eastenders

I would do away with these so called pundits during match commentary, they add nothing other than state the blatantly obvious or try to be controversial. What purpose does it serve for instance having 1 x host and 2 or 3 x pundits standing on the pitch gibbering nonsense and then a match commentator along with another pundit sitting along side him. Total waste of money IMO, do away with them all bar the match commentator and offer the viewer a cheaper subscription.

I'm a fan of Foderingham but this is Gilks tourney.

Any disciplinary matter cannot be disgust until it has been settled.

I'm afraid things are more black and white when it comes to employment law. Not being an expert but if a company has rules and side steps for one person then others will look for the same treatment.

As other have answered, different regime and probably internal rule change i would have thought.

If he has broken club rules regarding betting then its looking more likely to be a sacking than a pay off.

I certainly hope he has been training and keeping himself physically fit, remember he had very little pre- season training.

Sat straight in line with the senderos one and thought it was more the thistle player who cut across him and never a foul and certainly never a booking.

Just terrible

Rangers 3 Partick Th 0 FGS = Waghorn

What if the club asks for Tav's card to be upgraded to a red then we can appeal it. Seriously though, when a ref makes a blunder and owns up surely he can request the yellow to be rescinded ,no? or will opinions still differ so much that it would be to difficult to apply evenly?

A quick google search shows 2 sections with yellow seats. The section on the other side of the fence in the video where the Rangers fans are have yellow seats while the other side are all red. The second section is nearer the opposite goal so looks like it came from the away section. As above image posted by FS.

Wes almost got to it and my point is if he had been more central in his goal even half a step we would be discussing the save.

Just watched it again and agree it was well struck but still question Wes's starting position as i'm sure he will.

I'm a fan of Wes and don't think i'm being harse, look at the goal from the view behind the goal and look at his positioning. He should have not given the taker a look at that side and forced him into shooting for the far corner IMO.

Hayes dived about all afternoon getting 2 players booked in the process and agree that Foderingham's starting position was wrong and should have been more central. The ref should have booked Shinnie for an identical foul but chose not to give him a second. The Kranjcar booking spoilt it for the ref as he got whistle happy from that point on.

Indeed, Sutton mentioned it god know how many times and how it was game changing....

That whole report is twisted beyond belief.

I like the "clap if you love Rangers" on 11mins option best. As others say hopefully as they begin clapping we stick the ball in the pokey, always the best way to shut them up. Anyhow this pish isn't going away until 55 is registered.

I like the idea of this but don't see it catching on. Big decisions, like seen in rugby, can take a few minutes to decide as replays are watched many times over and from multiple angles and us football fans are wired differently from other sport fans and don't have the patience to sit around and wait. Add to that differing opinions, how many replays of incidents have you watched over and over again and still have a different opinion from the next guy?

They need to toe the party line and wait till their inglorious leader has advised on what that will be.

Suppose so Ian but in my mind that's a price worth paying....