Jump to content

 

 

blueflag

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,759

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

 Content Type 

Everything posted by blueflag

  1. blueflag
    Do we really need the running commentary?
  2. blueflag
    What a fud
  3. blueflag
    no real suprise
  4. blueflag
    Does Dr Zia post on the fb page for rfb?
  5. blueflag
    Il check this and get back to you
  6. blueflag
    If you didn't laugh you would cry [emoji23] [emoji23] boy has that aim blogger pissed them off haha. Also if a bear had been arrested for hacking there site pretty sure it would have been public news. Me thinks he just ranting pish
  7. blueflag
    Shhhhh I like you....I know how IT works.....that's like tempting fate fella [emoji2]
  8. blueflag
    Sorted your typo @BD- Should see a little pencil sign beside the poll name
  9. blueflag
    Sorry for the closed forums tonight. We were upgrading our back-end software vbulletin to help further enhance background work done to make the site a bit more efficient We may in the future release some of the added features of vbulletin, however for the majority of you there shouldn't be much visable difference. Please drop us a email if you have any issues with php errors or database related to the forum . Thanks for your patience. Work was completed successfully and our database was closed at the time of upgrade to allow us to keep all posts made until I closed the forums tonight. Over and Out! BF
  10. blueflag
    It's a tricky one bertz. I've not had good luck with chrome and 8. Chrome runs sandboxed which win8 doesn't particularly like. But million other things it could be I'm afraid. I'd use the other browser and be happy.
  11. blueflag
    Does it do it in other browsers ? I.e the same laggy crap? Don't shoot the messenger but win 8 really built for IE
  12. blueflag
    Db I think that should have read *tin foil hat on again *
  13. blueflag
    Pretty sure there were outrage on facebook just other week when they stopped it haha
  14. blueflag
    Not any more it doesn't [emoji14]
  15. blueflag
    I'm down that way a lot. And know a lot of Geordies lol where when and how
  16. blueflag
    What does it even matter
  17. blueflag
    Well done Frankie . Your initial email seems to have worked a peach here. Go the power of the people
  18. blueflag
    Time to kill the retail then...
  19. blueflag
    And gersnet was there with a gersnet.cjb.net before he acquired a pretty domain. .. see. I remember well.
  20. blueflag
    Use a uk proxy and bbc if your really stuck
  21. blueflag
    Shit bed Stuart. Hope your well. If you can guess who I am and how I remember you there's a pint in it
  22. blueflag
    Well found an interesting pieces on the gambling commission website regarding integrity in sport betting. Available here http:// https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&ei=MnTBVIGPD8TtUs6fg9AG&url=http://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/pdf/Integrity%2520in%2520sports%2520betting%2520-%2520issues%2520paper%2520-%2520consultation%2520-%2520May%25202007.pdf&ved=0CC0QFjAA&usg=AFQjCNFZIt-ORi4YDDwm2aGuKTGu738yIg&sig2=cehzexRZVOZytvwZkGUeZQ I must stress I don't condone his actions, rather questioning how the sfa go about there business
  23. blueflag
    Indeed they can do that... However. that opens a can of worms I'm about 99%sure a decent lawyer would agree. They could tell the sfa about there concerns but they can't pass on sensitive personal information .. no matter what way they twist it word it spin it. If there's a crime the police have to go through certain criteria to get the data. So I repeat mate what gives any sporting authority this power. Somebody should challenge the sfa on this and piss on there parade. It depends all o what exactly they pass on in regards to sensitive information. Sensitive information is things you can be discriminated against which included d.o.b etc. How could sfa even confirm it was this player without them confirming the players d.o.b or some other sensitive info?
  24. blueflag
    Sorry Zappa. The information commissioner would not give a toss about any agreement with the sfa or the fact people bet on there own sports. Morally wrong I agree but acts like the data protection act don't hold much leeway for flexibility. Is it a crime? Legal crime? even the police can't just demand 'sensitive personal information' so what gives the sfa this right?
  25. blueflag
    I skipped by about 7 pages simply to reply to this. What nonsense I'm afraid, no such thing as as a private facebook! You can change any setting you want to hide from public however go take a read at the terms and conditions of Facebook. (And twitter for that matter) Then come back and concede your wrong
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.