Scott7

If I hadn't written better than the DR when I was in P7 I'd have been in big trouble.

Tom Miller ‏@TomCommentator 3h3 hours ago

Last time Raith won at Ibrox v Rangers was 1959 .Jim Baxter turned in a sensational performance that saw Scot Symon sign him. If only......

And it was the end of the line for Willie Telfer who had done a great job in securing the defence after a League Cup Final defeat.

We have a lot of possession because we don't try to do anything with the ball except go sideways and backwards.If the opposition feel up to it and come to get the ball the possession stats plummet.

I don't suppose they'll run a 'bus from Greenock.

If you were a shareholder unable to attend, which director would you trust with your proxy?

The current tie could be anything. The previous was distinctive. I never bought the new one even when all seemed to be well.

I'm not in favour of disrupting play. That has an adverse effect on the opposition club and to a lesser extent on the league we are playing in. I know people will say they were all against us but we've chosen to play with them and (ahem) sporting integrity and all that.

The caption's wrong.

"A great honour to meet the Rangers leader"

I'd prefer an Alamein to an Alamo.

"The Facility is to be secured by (1) a floating charge over the Club's assets and (2) fixed charges over Murray Park, Edmiston House, Albion Car Park, and the Club's registered trademarks."

I read that as the fc covering the whole of the "club's" assets but without specific security over Ibrox. That leaves Ibrox subject to the fc but open to competition from other creditors especially if they can get in with a security when the current Ashley option expires in ? days.

Did you arrive at this conclusion after Bradford's third or fourth, Ser B?

They've been quite clever in a way because they've already had the content of their ad made public without having to pay for it.

Is it prudent for a company teetering on the brink of insolvency to borrow money without a credible plan for repayment? Are not shareholders rightly aggrieved? Fair enough to borrow sufficient to keep trading up to an imminent point of investment but sound fiscal management must usually prefer investment to borrowing. Could the directors be interdicted from borrowing excessively until an egm if a reasonable estimate could be made of the amount needed? Perhaps clever blokes like fs or BD can tell us.

Ashley would be an idiot to lend unless default would bring about some happy alternative outcome for him and we don't need clever blokes to tell us what that is.

He makes idiots of himself and his clients. The whole PR industry is an utter charade. Beats me why those who pay them can't see that for themselves.

Cowden will probably clear the pitch.

Last Saturday Burnley played on a perfect green surface with snow lying all around the outside of the ground.

...... andthe big man could heid them in.

Surprised her brother hasn't joined as well.

Classic image. Ball in the back of the net, Jimmy Millar turning away, arms raised and a crestfallen 'keeper contemplating the misery of life. Wonderful.

I've got the 1 - 7 wound stripe and strangely the young and middle aged spalpeens make much more of it than their grandfhathers did at the time. It all blew over in a couple of weeks.

Those were less frenzied, more sensible days.

I wouldn't like to see Ally's garden. Turnips in the front border. Feeble flowers in the vegetable plots. Costly second rate imported tubers all over the place.

Your 'anyone but Ally' line is reminiscent of those who backed Whyte because he wasn't Murray, Green because he wasn't Whyte and now they have the hots for Ashley.

 

Last night you were adamant that you wanted competent people in the boardroom, so why is it that you are prepared to settle for 'better' in the managerial department?

I think he was doing a bit of irony.

That is far too much baggage for any manager, never mind Rangers. A whole new field of opportunity for the timmish press.

Get McGregor signed up so that Rangers get a fee when a big team comes in for him.

The game most certainly is not doing fine.

It's prospering. It's booming. It's flourishing.

Your command of the English language is slightly better than mine, dB, so there's no excuse for not having understood the message from SFA/SPFL control.

How on earth can "a Rangers ace" "struggle to cement a place in the starting lineup"?

If Templeton is an "ace" it's like having a pack of cards with fifty three jokers

Stands out a mile doesn't he?