Scott7

She doesn't half talk a power of shite in this video - http://cdn.theguardian.tv/brightcove/2011/11/11/111109KarynMcCluskey-16x9.mp4

What a load of utter cobblers. Where did she get her qualifications? Cocoa School?

Observe her hand movements during interview. She's either play acting or has zero confidence in her theories. If I had a Cocoa School degree I'd probably be able to know which.

I've never met Frankie but I know he doesn't belong in that company.

I would pay to watch di Canio but I wouldn't have him in my team.

Johnstone was a supreme entertainer, marvellous to watch but less productive than Henderson so, again, he wouldn't be in the team.

Ian St John

And Kenny Dalglish.

If Neil Martin had a bit more pace he'd have been world class.

John Cumming and Dave McKay from the Maroons and Peter Cormack and Pat Stanton of the Hibs would have been good.

Could they have repaid the monies

No.........".

Doubt it. They're still on the list.

This is what I was feart of yesterday but at least the game's still on.

He can afford it, of course, but he will have had his own costs to pay which will be the same again plus. Possibly £500,000 to £600,000 maybe more.

I don't think the SFA fight will affect Rangers.

To reduce the onerous contracts you would have to prove collusive fraud between the company's director/employee/agent and the other contracting party. To expand on Bluedell's admirable example, it would be necessary to show that wee Jeannie was giving a percentage to the director's backmpocket. Either that or the fact that wee Jeannie kent fine the particular director had no authority to procure the company's milk supplies.

and what pray tell could that be?

I haven't a clue but in a long fraud indictment there's often a chance for the defence to raise questions of competency and relevancy and get the thing bunged out or have parts excluded. Let's just hope its just procedure and evidence they're bickering about..

I hope they're discussing future evidential procedures for the trial and not some defence submission that will lead to the whole thing being thrown out.

I will say one thing before bed though...The RST are quite right in everything they said and it was carefully worded...that's all folks.

Carefully worded it was not. Some forensic anaysis should be applied before publication.

In this sort of combat the stiletto beats the bludgeon.

Smuggs reckons he's already won it.

Mona Figments.

It's not the club's job to defend fans. That's a task for supporters' groups but there are too many of these and unity of voice is hard to get.

Hope you're fit soon, Como. There are plenty of folk wandering the streets full of drugs without the excuse of havng been in hospital.

If I take a swing at you in the pub but I miss I still get done for attempted assault. The tackle looked to be reckless rather than intentional but still worth the sending off.

The complaining hibby reader will have taken the numbers of the two policemen won't he?

You have nerves of steel

fs, you are not obliged to say anything but anything you do say will be taken down in pencil, rubbed out, altered and used in evidence against you. I think that's how it goes.

Best leave it to the press but if you read anything wrong you would be entitled to say that in your belief it is inaccurate without giving reasons. Your loyal readership here will know whom to trust.

"The Hibs clash caused shock among television audiences as outlawed sectarian songs such as the Billy Boys were blasted from the Govan stands in the win over their promotion rivals."

Really? Names and addresses of witnesses please.

Gaun yersel, Kenny, son.

Newcastle and Sunderland take large followings to the deep south. I think Rangers could as well but it just won't happen.

BH, a year or two back you were trying to persuade us Aird was the new Alec Scott.