-
Posts
13,603 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
19
Everything posted by RANGERRAB
-
It looks very much to me that SKY don't want anything to do with their SPL contract if we're not in SPL. Also SPL are contractually obliged to pay SFL £2M. SPL haven't got the money without SKY contract not to mention they need our media rights too which SFL don't want them to get. Intersting week ahead !!!!!!!!11
-
Is it not the case that SKY have told SPL that unless they can get Rangers media rights(to show Rangers games) then there's no SKY deal for SPL next season ? SFL won't give the SPL Rangers media rights. also SPL pay SFL £2M per season. Without SKY deal(and who knows what value it will be) SPL can't pay this money. Could SPL therefore be insolvent ? All in all a shambles ! Regan & Doncaster created this mess along with the SPL chairmen who voted us out the SPL. Resign at once both of you.
-
Surely it is for the governing body i.e. the SFA to decide if SFL & SPL can't agree
-
SPL wants Rangers media rights or else NO Rangers.
RANGERRAB replied to 54andcounting's topic in Rangers Chat
Don't worry. Soon there will be no SPL. August 10th is its Armaggedon day when it discovers how much (if anything) SKY are prepared to pay for next season's SPL. Just watch for a fashion surge in brown trousers from then on -
do we really know for sure the problem with the SPL is the removal of SPL titles ?
-
dean shiels may be a decent signing but it's really an out-and-out striker we really need. Dean isn't really that. more of an attacking MF IMO from what I've seen of him
-
leggo's exclusive was with SFA not stripping us of Scottish Cup wins. How could we keep SC & league cups but not SPL titles ? same players. I suspect SPL are in blind panic as SKY are ready to walk and want monies from our televised games
-
forget the SFA. I'm more concerned about whatever the SPL's problem is. As I've said in earlier posts is it not the case that for this new proposed transfer embargo we'd only be unable to register players in JAN2013? aug31 2013 is on a sunday so surely the transfer window would stay open a day or 2 into september when we could sign players ???? What's the SPL problem?
-
griffiths not the answer. was poor last season for the trainspotters
-
Surely the SFA (as the governing body) can over-rule the SPL ? My take on MM's statement is that agreement with the SFA has been reached provided we accept this delayed tranfer embargo.
-
Ally needs to get to work right away. We need bodies in now especially a striker or two
-
EXACTLY. This is what I've been saying. All in all it's only really JAN2013 when we'll be completely unable to bring anyone in. We need to get cracking however and get bodies in.
-
Just hope we've not volunteerd for anything else. I think this embargo isn't as bad as might have been as I said on others posts. Remember SEP01 2013 is on a sunday next year so the transfer window probably won't close til Monday SEP02 or the day after. In saying that though we'd need to get our act together next summer regards signing players...........
-
IMO there'll be serious league reconstruction next summer(not to mention serious panic stations over the SPL SKY TV deal which may or may not exist by then). The worst we'll find ourselves in IMO is one division below SPL (if it's still called that by then) That's why it's important we make good signings over these next 6 weeks. Preferably players in the under 25 age bracket.
-
think about this for a minute................. we can sign anyone in next 6 weeks. we can't sign anyone in Jan 2013. we can't sign anyone until Aug31 2013. BUT Who's to say we couldn't get a few Bosmans to train with us next summer (and maybe play them as trialists in friendlies) and sign them on SEP1 next year ?
-
think about this for a minute............. we can sign players in next 6 weeks. we can't sign anyone in January we can't sign anyone next year up until AUG31 BUT - who is to say we couldn't get a couple of Bosman's to train with us over next summer & sign them on SEPT 1 2013 ????
-
Has anyone else heard rumour SKY are quitting SPL altogether ? how many SPL clubs would that mean going into administration !!!!! and have the SPL considered the scenario where SPL clubs won't be able to complete their fixtures ?
-
Just accept the transfer embargo and let's get on with it FFS!
RANGERRAB replied to Zappa's topic in Rangers Chat
Green must deliver an exocet to the SFA asap. We need to show these people we mean business. Tell them we don't recognise their kangaroo court and will still claim 54 titles regardless of what they say. Don't worry fellow bears when details of the SPL SKY contract are known on AUG10 they'll all realise their mistake then by putting us in div3. My guess is SKY may wish to leave altogether. And btw what's compliance officer Vincent Lunny going to speak to Ally about ? apparently you can chase a referee on the pitch at hampden or call a referee a criminal and get a slap on the wrist so what's he going to do to Ally then? -
Remember an EBT is technically a loan which has to be paid back at a distant date (in reality it never is paid back). It's not an additional contract as such but as I said a loan from the people administering the EBT scheme i.e. the trustees.
-
Just accept the transfer embargo and let's get on with it FFS!
RANGERRAB replied to Zappa's topic in Rangers Chat
Fight the SFA. Fight this embargo -
Just accept the transfer embargo and let's get on with it FFS!
RANGERRAB replied to Zappa's topic in Rangers Chat
If we accept this illegal signing embargo then they'll come up with something else. Then something else. It will go on and on and on. FFS can we not see it is Liewell who runs the SFA with Regan as his puppet. Green needs to fight fire with fire and start an all out assault on the corrupt SFA. We've been punished enough: 10pt deduction to concede SPL title last season, heavily fined and not to mention demoted to div3. I rest my case -
As things stand we won't be playing any football next season. We don't have SFA membership. Talk of TV deals is a farce