RANGERRAB

I'd be delighted if Hutton proved us all wrong but just can't see it. Last season was his missed opportunity IMO.

Gallacher surely can't go out on loan until the end of next month when the transfer window closes? Bell can only play 3 games as a trialist can't he?

He isn't the only one who may, in years to come, look back upon last season as a missed opportunity

He was very disappointing last season & I'd gladly have got rid of him for this season. He's going to find it extremely difficult to get a game this season so he'll need to prove everyone wrong after what he showed last saeason

In all honesty can't see us getting anyone better than what we've got in reserve already. I'd be surprised if Mather agreed to this unless a few players get released first

Sorry totally disagree. Genuinely believe if we get the CB's sorted out then we'll be there or thereabouts in the LC & SC this season. Why fear Celtic? when I look at some of their SPL performances last season I think they're there for the taking.

wonder why WS never pointed this out to Ally? or did he?

I don't think he does get stick. Remember he's 35 now & not getting any younger. I think this was why Ally brought in Jon Daly who'll do a similar job to what jig did. Jig will always be a Rangers legend after summer 2012.

unfortunately for jig I genuinely don't think he'll be in Ally's first choice eleven after SEPT01. I do think Ally has recruited well so far & if we get the CB's sorted out then there's no reason we can't win both the LC & SC this season.

Jig will always be a legend after last summer but I thought it was asking a bit much when he got a new contract taking him up to his 37th birthday in two years time. Does anyone genuinely believe he'll still be challenging for a first team place up til then ?

Our history & heritage is of a scottish protestant unionist club. If we wish to become a truly global brand then we must become all-inclusive. I don't have a problem with that so as we don't lose our history & heritage which we shouldn't do. Is it not the case Rangers now have more catholic supporters than Celtic have protestant supporters? Bet that would upset some over at the girodome.

Other than Murdo Fraser MSP not one said a word. Mind you didn't expect or get support from the SNP either

how he deals with the cabal running scottish football will go a long way to determining how successful he is? also unless the product on the park is vastly improved from last season what will he do?

Would you vote for George Galloway ? John Reid? Michael Mather? Roseanna Cunningham ?

what amazes me is us Rangers supporters continue to elect politicians at all levels who despise our club & were actively trying to put it out of business altogether last summer. Until we're vigilant in whom we elect we'll go on getting this sort of treatment dished out to us. My response is simply to find out what you can about your local politicians. Do what I do. If they've any association with the east end mob don't vote for them.

Thought king won his battle with SARS?

Would like to see us scoring more goals. Maybe with a few more games that'll happen.

No one with half a business brain in their head would commit to a 9 year TV deal. Surely this isn't correct ?

If we want to do something about this it's dead easy - cancel all SKY Sports/BT sports subscriptions and don't watch any televised Rangers game on these channels. Once viewing figures go into meltdown the satellite TV broadcasters will either pull out altogether or pay the SPFL much less. Rangers get little or none of this money so it won't affect us.

Currently does that get you every game home & away ? The difference in this Benfica TV deal is that it's for resident supporters not just for overseas

I cannot & will not accept Rangers being called cheats because we used a perfectly legal tax avoidance scheme used by thousands of UK companies. The cheating implication put out on numerous occasions by journalists & media organisations yet Rangers took little or no action. Very disappointing indeed. The other major untruth was that debts acrued during the Advocaat era led to the financial collapse of the oldco. They did not. Whyte not paying over PAYE/NI caused a debt resulting in HMRC refusing a CVA. The debt when PLG became manager stood at £6m which was well done from the £80m or so previously.

Doesn't make sense does it i.e. interview two people for same job & one doesn't want it . If true, will Longmuir reveal all regards the top secret TV contract ?

Was rumoured some time ago Doncaster was leaving as he had a job down south. Perhaps true after all. However can't see much difference to us if indeed Longmuir has got the job. Liewell, Thompson & Fraser will call the shots helped by their Alloa chum.

Legal action should be taken where there is a blatant anti-Rangers agenda by publishing or broadcasting inaccurate or unsubstantiated articles with the aim of damaging Rangers Football Club. There is a world of difference between banning free speech & banning someone from an organisation or publication who has written or broadcast something which they know isn't true but they go ahead regardless knowing no action will result in pursuit of their agenda That is why no mark journos such as English, Spiers & Keevins and BBC Scotland, the Daily Rhebel & Radio Snyde have continued their relentless onslaught over these past few years

If a so-called journalist writes something about Rangers who is blatantly not true then the CEO should take legal action against the so-called journalists and his/her newspaper. Spiers effectively called Rangers cheats over the BTC yet no action was taken. Why ?