Jump to content

 

 

RANGERRAB

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    13,578

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    19

 Content Type 

Everything posted by RANGERRAB

  1. RANGERRAB
    it will eventually mean a takeover will it not ?
  2. RANGERRAB
    how many fines is that now from UEFA ? they must have been fined at least once every season for the past half-a-dozen seasons
  3. RANGERRAB
    they haven't exactly said very much up until now have they? what are their plans for the club ? do they have funding ? if so who ?
  4. RANGERRAB
    if this is true will the club take action ? why should Rangers be punished for his time at Hertz for games he never played in? is he the only player ever to have had a bet on his own team? will Ally produce his list now ? I think the SFA might have dug themselves a hole here which could grow and grow
  5. RANGERRAB
    What we all need to realise that this is all part of their masterplan since you-know-who was their chairman. They're trying to portray us as a 'toxic brand'. We're racists, bigots, who ran up a £134m tax bill paying players we couldn't afford whilst they're the good guys at the 'club for all'. The reality is of course completely different as can be see by their supporters constantly displaying support for terrorists groups and their supporters general behaviour as the people of Dundee & Brentford will testify for in recent times. It's all about headline-grabbing & it matters not whether factually correct or not. Once the headline has got out it will have some sort of lasting effect. The piece of scum is playing his part too. The actual article in the newspaper did not actually mention Rangers by name but the implication was there. The headline got out. No one bothered to check the facts & this guys background except VB. Also, how is the police investigation progressing ? most buses have CCTV in them nowadays so surely the attackers would have been identified by now. Was there really an incident at all ? considering Girvan's previous I'd cast doubts on that. Sooner or later there'll be another headline like this one where the mhedia are only too willing to put out a headline portraying Rangers and/or its supporters in a bad light. They probably won't bother to check their facts either. If they think there's a market out there for anti-Rangers stuff out there then they'll soon find out there isn't when their sales fall even further than now.If this doesn't give Rangers supporters a reason to stop buying the Sun then nothing will.
  6. RANGERRAB
    For as long as the BBC continue to be funded by a mandatory annual licence fee we have the right to demand accurate, unbiased broadcasts. It seems to me the BBC Scotland cannot hope to achieve this if they continue to employ the likes of Spence, Cosgrove etc who have an anti-Rangers bias for which they use the BBC Scotland to air this bias. This cannot be allowed to continue & I hope we pursue them until we get the desired result i.e. the removal of these cretins from their positions within BBC Scotland
  7. RANGERRAB
    Scotland have just 4 goals in 8 games in this group before tonight's game. How poor is that ? Where the progress ?
  8. RANGERRAB
    Speirs has no credibility left whatsoever ever since Chris Graham wiped the floor with him on Scotland Tonight on the night of the BTC result last year. Being caught out telling blatant lies on live television you'd think organisations in this country wouldn't employ him again. Yet again this is Scotland unfortunately
  9. RANGERRAB
    aren't there 3 police investigations and an investigation by the Insolvency Service regards Whyte ?
  10. RANGERRAB
    It isn't. The man's a deluded Walter Mitty
  11. RANGERRAB
    the reality is Rangers need to look for additional sources of revenue just now especially as we're out of Europe for the forseeable future. That will be the challenge facing those remaining after the forthcoming EGM or AGM. For example why pay £3.5m for a carpark which gets used every second saturday ? can't it be used at other times to generate income ? just one idea which I think should be looked at
  12. RANGERRAB
    At least La LIGA is a 2 horse race. The SPL's successor is a 1 horse race which sponsors won't touch with a bargepole
  13. RANGERRAB
    when the CVA got rejected Whyte was irrelevent to the whole process. Even if Whyte was a SEVCO5088 director it never got the assets. Sevco Scotland got them. Was Whyte a director of SEVCO Scotland ? NO
  14. RANGERRAB
    and of course someone like Whyte would never produce a forgery would he?
  15. RANGERRAB
    was it not the case LBG bought a shareholding in MIH after Rangers were sold to the fraudster ? are you not suspicious now ? LBG were over-focussed on Rangers. Why ? because of who was running LBG in Scotland at that time. That's why
  16. RANGERRAB
    What would have the good people of Edinburgh have done to deserve this hardline Irish republican organisation ? Ship them back to Oir-lund where they supposedly come from (so they say). Yet again Ireland wouldn't want them either
  17. RANGERRAB
    Again I have to ask why the bank seemed so focused on our debt which was around 3% of the £750m MIH debt ? Surely Rangers were a very small debt which was part of an extremely large bank debt. The way LBG were acting you'd never have thought so.
  18. RANGERRAB
    all I want to know is whether SDM was blackmailed into selling Rangers by LBG. If so by whom at LBG & for what reasons. I believe every Rangers supporter should seek the answer to this.
  19. RANGERRAB
    a lot of clubs have/had a hell of a lot more debt than that. Did their banks take control? This was a deliberate act by LBG because of who was running its Scottish business division at that time. They & Muir did such a good job that they handed Rangers over to a fraudster who'd conned ticketus into giving him the money to give to LBG. Try looking at the bigger MIH picture. They were over £700m in debt so why were LBG so focused on Rangers?
  20. RANGERRAB
    what 'unsustainable debt' ? yes after kaunus the debt rose to £30m but AJ got in down to around £18m. It was not 'unsustainable'. It was being continually reduced but that wasn't good enough for the 2 bhoys at LBG's Scottish business division who put the financial squeeze on Rangers so as to assist their club(and of course HMRC did their bit by chasing a fictitious EBT tax debt) You should note too that Rangers debt was 3% of the MIH debt (over £700m) yet LBG seemed totally focused on Rangers for some reason. Why was that ? Maybe Fullerton & Kane at LBG could answer that one
  21. RANGERRAB
    No chance. That would be too much like common sense.
  22. RANGERRAB
    Wonder how the toffs in Edinburgh's affluent Murrayfield would feel about Glasgow's obsessed green 'n' grey underclass descending upon them ?????
  23. RANGERRAB
    maybe at long last we're beginning to see why Traynor was hired ?
  24. RANGERRAB
    The first thing we need is a proper global scouting system. Them over the other side are light years ahead of us with theirs.
  25. RANGERRAB
    SDM made HMRC an offer which they didn't accept. Why did they accept Arsenal and Chesea's offers then? BTW there were 26,000 oldco shareholders. I'd bet they DO take action once HMRC lose the UTT. Their shares are now worthless because when HMRC pursued Rangers tho' the BTC the club became unsellable(until you-know-who appeared). No BTC would have meant no Whyte
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.