Jump to content

 

 

RANGERRAB

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    13,578

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    19

 Content Type 

Everything posted by RANGERRAB

  1. RANGERRAB
    and who do you think got LBG's Scottish business division to do this ? handy when you had a couple of bhoys running it I suppose. and who do you think got HMRC to chase a fictitious tax bill to make the club virtually unsellable ? wee clue - he used to be chairman over at the east end
  2. RANGERRAB
    if you look at resolution 10 on the forthcoming AGM voting paper it says:- 'to enable the directors to allot shares for cash without first offering them to existing shareholders' if there were another share issue then you'd expect existing shareholders to be offered first refusal on new shares to maintain their % shareholding but this (to me) is an open invitation to a Dave King or Mike Ashley to take control by buying up new shares and pumping funds into the club. Anyone agree?
  3. RANGERRAB
    To be fair those 'outraged at porkheid' haven't said anything have they? I suppose that's a bit difficult when a certain Dr Reid has been their chairman what with his previous IRA sympathies in his university days (at lease according to Galloway anyway). No they just get their placemen (and women) in the mhedia to do their work for them don't they ? they pull the levers and the usual suspects pop up to spew their usual anti-Rangers bile
  4. RANGERRAB
    Have reservations about Faure. Just wonder if he's good enough for the level we want to eventually be at. Why did he leave France anyway? you need to ask that question
  5. RANGERRAB
    Just the usual wishful thinking from a Celt*c supporting so-called journalist like Gibbons. Hoping we'll 'topple back into the abyss' as he puts it. Won't happen. There's no fictitious EBT tax bill this time to deter a prospective buyer even if we did 'topple back into the abyss' as Gibbons puts it. Surely even a poor journo like Gibbons realises that.
  6. RANGERRAB
    they're getting desperate mate. Wonder if they'll be able to meet all their financial obligations without this sponsorship
  7. RANGERRAB
    are they going to the courts then ? if so when? and will they stop the AGM going ahead?
  8. RANGERRAB
    are you sure about that?
  9. RANGERRAB
    they certainly reneged on a deal - if there ever was one in the first place. Were the requisitioners really that naive ?
  10. RANGERRAB
    An interesting article by Tom Gallagher but I think some of his viewpoints are very much in the minority of Celt*c supporters. He is absolutely correct in that attempts were made to put us out of business altogether last year. I keep saying to fellow Bears that these people haven't gone away & will continue to do everything they can to damage Rangers.We must be vigilant regarding these people almost all of whom are Celt*c-connected in one way or another - and not just mere supporters. Gallagher seems to also give some sort of respectability to some of the most bitter Rangers-haters who make no effort to disguise that hatred that I am absolutely astonished they've escaped prosecution. Yet again maybe I shouldn't be as I have serious misgivings about the police & judicial service in scotland and some of the individuals within it. No I think things changed forever between the two clubs the minute a certain Dr John Reid became their chairman. Anyone who's read my opinions on here will know my views on who it was who got HMRC to pursue Rangers over a fictitious tax bill & who got LBG to pressurise SDM into selling to whyte. Gallagher, if anything, avoids real issues in what I was say is generally a commendable blog
  11. RANGERRAB
    which part of 'no prospective sponsor would touch the SPFL with a bargepole without Rangers in its top division' doesn't Dumbcaster understand?
  12. RANGERRAB
    I don't think the requisitioners are going about this the right way either. How much support do they actually have from the shareholders and was it a good idea to let the AGM go ahead as planned before this attempt to stop it?
  13. RANGERRAB
    Am I the only one who doesn't believe a word of this latest SUN story ? it's now 3 days since that game. Why haven't the police arrested anyone yet? it shouldn't be too difficult should it? and how many people would actually recognise Scott Brown's mother anyway ? not many I wouldn't think. Is this the SUN trying to even things up after the ridiculous '****** dog' story a couple of weeks ago?
  14. RANGERRAB
    one thing that never seems to get discussed is MP & how much it costs to run it with all these youth teams, youth coaches, all the tournaments they go to not to mention expenses incurred. If we have this type of set up it must produce players year on year who can be sold on for profit like Ajax do. As far as I can see that's not happening right now. Is it just coincidence we seemed to start making bigger losses since it opened 12 years ago?
  15. RANGERRAB
    Am i the only one of the opinion that the sooner Frank Blin gets a place on the board the better. At least we would know that we had someone with impeccable credentials in whom we should be able to trust. Reading everything today there seems to be money flying around in all directions. This must be worrying
  16. RANGERRAB
    This national broadcaster i.e. BBC Scotland will become unbiased when it stops receiving its outdated licence fee from the people of this country regardless of whether they watch BBC Scotland or not and it becomes dependent on commercial revenue from other sources. It will then be reliant on audiences because that will determine how much revenue it would get and if it continued to produce inaccurate,biased & poorly-researched broadcasts and continued to employ some of the pond life who currently appear in these broadcasts then audience figures would fall and thus revenues would fall accordingly too. Other broadcasters exist in this way. Why can't the BBC ?
  17. RANGERRAB
    We need a strong robust response from the club regards this. It should not be afraid to confront them from the east end(and others too) over their continual denials about their problems which are far greater than ours in my opinion. They have their placemen(and women) in the media and politics who continually gloss over their issues and turn the attention onto us. We need to be resolute over this
  18. RANGERRAB
    without us in the top flight the game is doomed. That's all I'm saying. They took a decision to throw Rangers out of the SPL and it will have a detrimental effect at some point. The SPFL has no sponsor. The LC has no sponsor. It looks like Liewell & Doncaster signed a SKY deal for years in advance(so they didnt quit) at no increase in revenue over those years. Are you suggesting these directors believe that their supporters will make up the shortfall over these next few years? sorry craig just can't see it
  19. RANGERRAB
    not sure their bank managers would be quite as easily fooled..............
  20. RANGERRAB
    as a taxpayer-funded organisation the BBC has a duty to produce impartial broadcasts of a required standard which are factually-correct and inoffensive. Employing the likes of Cosgrove, Spence and Cowans runs a very high risk of compromising all of that. Me thinks an example has been made of Cosgrove in this instance. Time will tell how it impacts on his remaining chums who are much worse than him
  21. RANGERRAB
    The actions of a board of directors who know the game is up.
  22. RANGERRAB
    and did they honour these assurances ? motherwell supporters didn't. They finished last season on the supporters trust's overdraft. others just give away thousands of free tickets to massage their attendances.
  23. RANGERRAB
    IRA Supporter Greenslade is phil multi-names neighbour in donegal. say no more
  24. RANGERRAB
    did every SPL club director break the law then when they voted Rangers out of the SPL ? if they've to 'make decisions for the benefit of the company' then voting Rangers out led to reduced revenue which will get worse as the new SPFL hasn't got a sponsor. Neither has the LC
  25. RANGERRAB
    the dhims will vote whoever is most likely to win an election so they themselves can try to gain power by becoming involved in whichever political party that may be. They're hypocrites. How can they vote for any UK unionist party(labour,tory or libdem) but turn up at the glitterdome every other week singing the irish independence songbook?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.