Jump to content

 

 

RANGERRAB

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    13,578

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    19

 Content Type 

Everything posted by RANGERRAB

  1. RANGERRAB
    Everyone had the opportunity to get shares a year ago. The ones who chose not to seem to be making the most noise at present. Frankly it was a joke that the requisitioners were simply going around lobbying shareholders instead of getting proper financial backing. What was Jim McColl all about ? King too. If Laxey can fork out £1.3m for 5 per cent of Rangers couldn't McColl or King have done that given their wealth? Or maybe more ? We are where we are.Rangers are a plc owned by shareholders who will elect who they wish to run Rangers on thursday. It's a foregone conclusion. Get over it.
  2. RANGERRAB
    Why sign a deal with Puma for one season ? Makes no sense to me. This needs brought up at the AGM
  3. RANGERRAB
    I'm sure I read somewhere that the Puma/Blackthorn deal is for one season only ? Surely that can't be true ?
  4. RANGERRAB
    The Green brigade blatantly broke so many laws so often over a period of time that the question needs asked how they got away with it for so long.I'm sure it has nothing to do with the fact Scotland's so-called top lawman Mulholland QC is supposedly a ST holder at Snake Mountain but it seemed to be that only UEFA were prepared to do anything about this organisation.
  5. RANGERRAB
    Can you prove HMRC were within their rights to chase that EBT Case? EBT's were a perfectly legal form of tax avoidance used by thousands of UK companies until they were closed down following legislation. I hope following the UTT early next year we find out who it was who got HMRC to chase this fictitious tax bill.
  6. RANGERRAB
    No it wasn't.It was always going to happen when Whyte took over.He hadn't the funds to run Rangers. I want to know who was responsible for allowing him to take over Rangers.
  7. RANGERRAB
    Had Whyte never got Rangers in the first place then administration would never have happened.we need to know how Whyte got Rangers. Did LBG force SDM into selling to Whyte? If so why, by whom at LBG and for what reasons?
  8. RANGERRAB
    So why were they more concerned with Rangers debt instead of the much larger MIH debt?
  9. RANGERRAB
    You should ask why HMRC chose to go after Rangers for this fictitious EBT tax bill. I firmly believe a certain former labour cabinet minister used his political connections to get them to do this as part of the plan to put us out of business altogether.It very nearly succeeded.
  10. RANGERRAB
    By continually ignoring and denying the existence of militant Irish republicanism within their support Celt@c perhaps unintentionally created a monster called the green brigade which is turning to destroy them.Despite today's actions these people will not go away as they see Celt@c as their stage to show their militant Irish Republicanism. Liewell is terrified of these people and cannot and will not be able to remove them on a permanent basis. The fun has just begun. Let's sit back and watch this vile club unravel in the months and maybe years ahead.Who knows their Irish identity may destroy them once and for all. Here's hoping.
  11. RANGERRAB
    Totally disagree. When LBG took over HBOS It meant emminent Celtic supporters Manus J Fullerton &Archibald G Kane were in charge of the scottish business division. That included MIH which of course included Rangers oldco. MIH had bank debt of over £700m and Rangers oldco had debt of around £18m (3 per cent of the MIH debt) yet LBG seemed much more interested in the Rangers debt and even appointed Muir & McGill onto the Rangers oldco board. Why would they do that ? Why weren't they more concerned with the much larger MIH debt? Was the opportunity to cause damage to Rangers too great to resist? Then to compound matters Whyte managed to acquire Rangers. Was SDM forced into selling to Whyte by LBG? If so by whom and for what reasons? That is the question we need answered. Let us hope the police investigations or the Insolvency Service can provide the answers we deserve. And not forgetting we need to find out why HMRC pursued us for a fictitious EBT tax bill which never existed. Did a former labour cabinet minister use his political contacts to do this? Hopefully after the UTT early next year this will become clearer too.
  12. RANGERRAB
    Plenty do thanks to a biased media in this country who will do as instructed by Liewell and his PR machine. This truth about this club is never reported
  13. RANGERRAB
    The existence of Celtic and the support they attract are a problem within this country which the politicians and authorities are unwilling to face up to. Nuremberg Hugh stops well short of admitting this in this article as does English in his. How much longer can this go on ?
  14. RANGERRAB
    I think Ally would move on Templeton and Shiels so long as he was allowed to replace them.
  15. RANGERRAB
    Why didn't McColl & King use their money to buy shares then? Then they would have had a major influence at the AGM.
  16. RANGERRAB
    He's not seriously suggesting the two Murrays and the other two are going to win at the AGM and replace the current board is he? I don't think they've a hope in hell of this
  17. RANGERRAB
    Can you blame him ? These people need to realise Rangers are a plc run by shareholders. It is these shareholders who take the decisions who runs Rangers just as in every other plc.Everyone had the opportunity to get shares last December.
  18. RANGERRAB
    Liewell is absolutely terrified of doing anything about what is a serious problem amongst a large section of their support.The authorities and the politicians in this country won't face this issue either.Only UEFA and the various police forces outside this country are prepared to do something about it.How long can it continue?
  19. RANGERRAB
    You need to ask how much support the 'requisitioners' actually have amongst current shareholders. It isn't a lot by all accounts and will mean the current board will win easily at the AGM. But if MCColl and KIng had bought shares(given their wealth) then things could have been very different.
  20. RANGERRAB
    Maybe they will but for me the real issue is that the 'requisitioners' would appear to have failed in their objective to gain control of Rangers.They simply haven't got enough support from the current shareholders. Couldn't McColl have bought shares ? Couldn't King have bought shares? They should start asking these questions amongst themselves. Their strategy has been flawed from the beginning which was little more than lobbying current shareholders
  21. RANGERRAB
    They are vastly over-represented in these fields unfortunately.
  22. RANGERRAB
    They are a hardline Irish Republican Club many of whose pond life supporters such as him openly support banned terrorist organisations.That is the identity they have chosen and must live with. I just don't want this club or it's 'supporters' in this country as I cannot see how they belong here.The problem is that their chosen country, Ireland, probably wouldn't want them either and the spineless politicians ,media and authorities in this country are unwilling to challenge them on these issues.
  23. RANGERRAB
    the board need to clarify this and state whether true or not. Cannot believe this deal exists and someone like graham Wallace would have taken CEO position knowing about this sort of commercial deal
  24. RANGERRAB
    We have eighteen months to identify players. We shouldn't need to make panic signings if those responsible do their jobs properly.That should be more than sufficient time to get a team together. We did try to build a young,attacking team last season but I think MCCoist feels the youngsters he used aren't good enough although he wont openly admit it.
  25. RANGERRAB
    We need to remember that providing there's no more reconstruction we should be returning to the top division in eighteen months time.Therefore it's vital we get a team in place before then so as we're not going round making panic signings at the last minute.Players we need should be getting identified now. Whether a lot of the youngsters will be part of our first team squad by then remains to be seen.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.