Jump to content

 

 

RANGERRAB

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    13,578

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    19

 Content Type 

Everything posted by RANGERRAB

  1. RANGERRAB
    The challenge facing Graham Wallace is how to reduce costs but at the same time improve the quality of the product on the pitch from what we saw last night and too often this season and last season.That will not be easy without some form of significant investment.The question is whether this board can get that investment and from whom.
  2. RANGERRAB
    But Ally likes a back four and a holding MF player(black) in the third tier of Scottish football.......
  3. RANGERRAB
    Where did the rest go ?
  4. RANGERRAB
    I'd agree with you but probably for different reasons. I'm none too convinced about Cammy Bell.He doesn't seem too clever coming off his line. I think that's why McCoist signed Simonsen
  5. RANGERRAB
    Wallace & the chairman have a big decision to take at the end of this season regards the manager.
  6. RANGERRAB
    I can't help wondering why Graham Wallace saw the need to try cutting first team player salaries as one of the first parts of his cost cutting measures instead of this £10m non-playing staff wages which I'd have thought would have been no1 priority
  7. RANGERRAB
    Let's face it this law was targeted at us Rangers supporters first and foremost.You only need to see how much the GB get away with to realise that.
  8. RANGERRAB
    Just unfortunately not so in our own country where our only use is to subsidise all other clubs via TV deals and the like.
  9. RANGERRAB
    Well we have got 55 players on the books(was56 butAndy Mitchell has left) and that makes 5 teams so do we not need 5 goalkeepers !!!!! Seriously how over-staffed are we? Why do we need so many players ? All we are at the end of the day is a first XI.
  10. RANGERRAB
    We certainly spend bucket loads of money on it at MP. Whether that is money well spent or not is something Graham Wallace will no doubt be looking at as part of his 120 day business review.
  11. RANGERRAB
    Is that true ?
  12. RANGERRAB
    When you see what Swansea City are being investigated for then you would think Celt@c havent a leg to stand on. Supporters/Shareholders in local government and government bodies selling them land at a fraction of its true value then using this land as security to get loans at the land's true value arranged by the club chairman and a director who were MPs in national government at the time. these loans were at unheard of rates of interest from a now basket case bank. You couldnt make this up could you?
  13. RANGERRAB
    They haven't bought Green's shares then?
  14. RANGERRAB
    Who is then?
  15. RANGERRAB
    We just don't know. Wallace needs to clarify this situation regards funding
  16. RANGERRAB
    In the DR interview Wallace seems to talk about adding players in the next two summer transfer windows as we go up the leagues. That will require funding. He needs to explain where that funding will come from if we're looking at cutting players salaries by 15 percent at present.
  17. RANGERRAB
    Why would hedge funds and such like buy shares in the company that owns a football club. Surely they have easier ways of growing their investments.
  18. RANGERRAB
    There's no doubt well need fresh investment in the not too distant future. It remains to be seen if this board can get that investment.
  19. RANGERRAB
    Don't you mean a couple of bhoys in that bank who eventually got chucked out that bank as a result?
  20. RANGERRAB
    I genuinely believe Wallace if he says we're not going bust but this is yet more negative publicity.Also what players would want to sign for a club who have been trying to introduce wage cuts?
  21. RANGERRAB
    Is that why our chum Rhegan's been sniffing about lately?
  22. RANGERRAB
    We've an unknown credit line ? Who?
  23. RANGERRAB
    We've unknown creditors ? Find that difficult to believe
  24. RANGERRAB
    After the 120 day business review(and whatever cuts are made) the board will go back to the institutional investors for funding. How successful that will be remains to be seen. You cannot go into administration without having creditors seeking payment
  25. RANGERRAB
    How can we go into administration? We've no creditors
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.