Jump to content

 

 

RANGERRAB

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    13,580

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    19

 Content Type 

Everything posted by RANGERRAB

  1. RANGERRAB
    A) no chance. King will not do this he has said so himself B) might happen at shares issue if insufficient existing shareholders don't take up their option C) unlikely because existing shareholders would have to consent D) unlikely board would get funding elsewhere even if secured borrowing which would not be good
  2. RANGERRAB
    Which will be what ?
  3. RANGERRAB
    You do realise those shares have to be offered to existing shareholders first?
  4. RANGERRAB
    It will be very interesting indeed to see if this board retain his services for next season
  5. RANGERRAB
    Trying to bully the financial institutions won't work and could be extremely dangerous
  6. RANGERRAB
    Not suggesting for a minute all's well but until there's a viable alternative we're where we are at the moment. Going to bottom tier meant we were never going to make money.We were always going to lose money starting at the bottom & going up the leagues in the shortest timescale possible. Don't get me wrong I think this board face big challenges in the months ahead most notably increasing revenue into the club. Are they up to those challenges ? Like you I have my doubts too but until there's a viable alternative we're stuck where we are but believe once we're back in the top division investment will be forthcoming
  7. RANGERRAB
    please explain how the 'club is being dragged down the swany' ? any excuse for a protest now methinks
  8. RANGERRAB
    who replaces them & who gets to choose their replacements then ?
  9. RANGERRAB
    The reqs had around 30% at the AGM. Much higher than I thought they'd get. I then expected DK to acquire shares(especially with the low share price) like Laxey & Prior did. If he then took the 30% the reqs got and added to his shareholding DK might have got the board would almost certainly have been ousted or at least the writing would have been on the wall for them. But he didn't and all we've had since is this constant sniping from the sidelines which is damaging the club. The time has now come for DK : put up or shut up.
  10. RANGERRAB
    If he's really interested in getting control he could have bought shares since the AGM. Like Prior & Laxey did.
  11. RANGERRAB
    If he buys shares he will get control but he won't do that up until now anyway. The forthcoming shares issue will tell us all we need to know about DK
  12. RANGERRAB
    I'm not even convinced he wants us on the cheap. He wants some sort of power without investing IMO.No doubt the two murrays involved too
  13. RANGERRAB
    If he really does have serious intentions then he has to acquire shares
  14. RANGERRAB
    Well I'm sure he'll get the opportunity to buy some shares at the forthcoming shares issue.......................
  15. RANGERRAB
    The time has now come for DK to acquire some sort of shareholding if he really has any intention of taking control at Rangers. Even a 5 to 10 percent shareholding would send out some sort of message.
  16. RANGERRAB
    Far from excessive I'd have thought.
  17. RANGERRAB
    Not sure I'd agree 1/7 is too high especially when you compare that to other clubs. The real challenge is to cut costs elsewhere but at the same time improve the first team squad. One area I'd target is MP. Given the fact the majority of the first team squad are recruited from other senior clubs do we really need all these youth teams, youth coaches etc ? How much does it cost to run the MP youth set-up ? unless it produces players who get into the first team and can then be sold every other year or so to the EPL and beyond(like Ajax do with the likes of Eriksen & Alderweid last summer) then it is a massive drain on finances.
  18. RANGERRAB
    FWIW I thought Alex Wilson & Scott Murdoch would have been ideal board members along with Frank Blin. Associating themselves with the Murrays double act was never going to get them elected
  19. RANGERRAB
    if the ownership goes what if it takes everything with it ? a very dangerous scenario indeed
  20. RANGERRAB
    How do you know they're' patsy and idiots' when you don't even know who they are ? Some people will not accept anyone on the board now unless they get to choose the board which they can't do because they don't own the company.
  21. RANGERRAB
    what war? he was only one who had a properly-funded bid.(unless you consider McColls 11th hour attempt to be a bid)
  22. RANGERRAB
    I'd disagree Frankie. Withholding money will contribute to the club's downfall. These are not normal times.
  23. RANGERRAB
    and rather than grandstanding on the outside if Dave King wants change he should use some of his alleged wealth to buy some shares and force change..........
  24. RANGERRAB
    If and when this board go they'll be replaced by another one. QUESTION: And who'll select the new board? ANSWER: the owners i.e. the shareholders who own RIFC. Not DK, UoF, SoS etc
  25. RANGERRAB
    that could happen believe me !!!! he's done similar before
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.