Jump to content

 

 

RANGERRAB

  • Posts

    13,580
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    19

Everything posted by RANGERRAB

  1. the product on the park needs to be improved though or people won't turn up to watch.
  2. how much would it cost? it's not as if he's got a job for life is it? so what you're saying is we're stuck with him until he decides he wants to go ? when will that be? the man's deluded. He's a rank rotten manager who'd never get another job anywhere else
  3. FWIW I'm not the board's greatest admirer either but until there's a viable alternative we're stuck with what we've got. I don't believe there will be any meaningful investment until we're back in the top division & playing in Europe. I don't believe DK & the Murrays double act represent a viable alternative which is a forlorn hope a lot of supporters are clinging to
  4. you go ahead. Just be careful there's still a club to support at the end of this if your dangerous ideas & beliefs ever come to fruition. Could you explain what you mean with money 'shared' between their interests and the club ?? what does that mean ??
  5. You're not still buying into that 50million stuff are you GS? Load of tosh IMO. The man has no intention of investing his kids' inheritance. Get over it. BTW when you talk of DK's wealth in 'millions' is that GBP or SA Rand ?
  6. Apart from going out of business altogether and the club having to reform in the amateur or junior leagues of Scottish football no there is little alternative. No Craig Whyte excuse this time when the SFA were obliged to transfer membership and the club continued under a newco.
  7. Who will it be after the Easdales then if they up & go despite the fact they've actually put their own money into Rangers ? Let's face it this is all about getting DK & the Murrays replacing the current board without putting in a single penny. But the majority of the shareholders don't want them as per the AGM before Christmas. So they're resorting to these sort of tactics which could have dire consequences for Rangers believe me. The shareholders own Rangers and that's how a plc operates. If they (UoF, SoS etc) can't understand that or won't accept that we have problems. Big problems. FWIW I don't believe DK is anywhere near as wealthy as he's made out to be. His wealth is measured in tens of millions and that's his kids' inheritance which he's reluctant to give away
  8. Complaining about Hamilton beating Morton 10-2 and calling Morton 'unprofessional' I believe because they lost 10 goals as it could have affected Dundee had they not beaten Dumbarton. Yet if my memory serves me correctly was Hartley not part of an Abergreen side which lost nine goals at the San Giro? Pot, Kettle black Paul?
  9. The board cannot possibly handover company assets to a third party. They'd get removed by the shareholders(who own the company) and be replaced by another board. What they want to do(provided the board hand over ibrox & MP as security which they won't) is collect ST monies mid july and then give the money to the club but if the board say no they won't collect any money....................
  10. TAKEN FROM WEBSITE FAQ's 'You are giving a mandate to Ibrox 1972 Ltd to collect and pass on your season ticket money to the club in the event that they grant security over Ibrox. If they do not agree then no money will be collected and the instruction will be cancelled on 8th August 2014 or shortly thereafter' Can someone explain to me this whole point in all of this if the board tell them where to go(as they will) regarding granting security of ibrox & MP ?
  11. Lemon's signings since we left the top division have generally been a disaster. Puki? Balde ? Borigter ? Ambrose is no standout either and I see they're trying to flog big clumsy Van Dyke for £8m. How can his value treble playing one season in the SPL, sorry SPFL Premiership(or whatever it's called).
  12. Be interesting to see if McCoist is allowed to sign 30 years old plus players with no resale value. Mather allowed him to. Perhaps Wallace may think otherwise
  13. I think we should remember too that KIllie are in dire straits at the moment and could easily get relegated.That would go some way to explaining this afternoon's result
  14. YAWN.......wish this lot would go away.The only thing they might achieve is damaging Rangers
  15. No chance of that. He's a manager with ideas and ambitions way above his ability. He'll need to be forced out I.e sacked
  16. I don't think this board have the balls to sack McCoist.
  17. SAF once said before you sign a player, check his attendance record. Unless we're signing Gordon on a pay-per-play basis (which I suspect we won't be) then this is a total waste of valuable resources
  18. But both JW & PLG were in the top division......we've been totally unimpressive against part timers
  19. Surely no other country would want an OF game ? The background to the next one will be problematic IMO. And they've caused it all by their actions I.e. Calling us cheats of perfectly legal EBT's, inventing fictitious debt levels, voting us out the SPL etc, etc
  20. Will the board agree to this ? Signing Gordon on a contract would be a massive risk IMO given his injury record. Surely McCoist must realise there are other positions in this team which are far greater priority?
  21. It certainly will be toxic......and the rest. After being accused of cheating thro' EBT's, trying to strip titles, voting us out the SPL and generally trying to put us out of business altogether I genuinely dread to think what the next game against them will be like. I'd be amazed if any other country would be daft enough to stage it
  22. They may well do if the price remains low
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.