Jump to content

 

 

RANGERRAB

  • Posts

    13,580
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    19

Everything posted by RANGERRAB

  1. What people seem to forget is Hertz went into administration with debts almost twice what we went into administration with I.e. approx £15m against approx £30m.They of course have exited administration now and not a cheap from the usual pond life who infest the mhedia in this hate-filled cesspit of a country of ours
  2. You're probably correct. He won't be. That being the case I really think he should walk away. If he isn't then prepared to buy out major shareholders then there's no way on this earth he is going to get control of Rangers.
  3. I do not think there is any chance of DK buying out major shareholders and he has previously stated he will not do so. Unfortunately I think his opportunity has come and gone after the AGM at the tail end of last year when the requisitioners got a much higher vote than expected of around 30 per cent each. DK should have been buying shares after that like Prior and Laxey did then he'd have been in a pretty strong position by now if his shareholding was added to the 30 percent the reqs got. If DK doesn't become involved in the latest share issue then we all really need to move on. He has had opportunities but simply hasn't taken them for whatever reason(s)
  4. For obvious reasons it is imperative we get back to the top division ASAP. That is why McGregor has been signed
  5. FWIW I do not believe King has any intention of investing because he does not have the wealth he is alleged to have. The sooner we move on from this the better
  6. Exactly. Another shares issue now is not what we want. The idea that these investor are simply going to hand over control of Rangers to SoS and UoF is laughable. Now what are they planning to do ? Hold another protest march? Fat lot of good that'll do
  7. So how did the likes of Alex O'Hara and Peter McCloy manage to sign for Rangers and McGrain didnt?
  8. Butcher was a complete and utter fool to have taken the job in the first place
  9. I don't want Shaun Hutchison either. He played in a Motherwell defence which conceded a helluva lot of goals last season
  10. Sevco 5088 was an english company which could not be re-registered as a Scottish company hence the decision to go to Sevco Scotland.I find the idea that Whyte somehow still owns Rangers as absolutely hilarious. Even mad Phil couldn't think that one up......or could he?
  11. Once the CVA got refused Whyte was irrelevant.
  12. More chance of me becoming the next pope than Whyte winning that one....
  13. Wonder when UEFA will get round to banning clubs who do dodgy land deals with their local council and then use this land as security to get soft loans using political connections from a basket case bank
  14. Used to fund the original purchase ? In what way?
  15. Well until there are court cases and prosecutions........
  16. The only dodgy owner we've had was Whyte. Whether you liked or disliked CG's consortium is was all above board and properly-funded
  17. Interesting article from Jackson. Almost makes him look like a journalist.Pity he once described Whyte's wealth as 'off the radar' though.Irreparable damage. However the bit towards the end about BDO putting 'so much into the legal cases as an indication as to where this thing is headed' is what we need to be aware of. Unless,of course, you still believe SDM willingly sold to Whyte.
  18. All the questions regards whether we're a new club or not have been answered by the relevant bodies and persons who have stated quite clearly that we are not a new club. For starters the SPFL do not consider us a new club. Check their website. it states Rangers were founded in 1872 and lists all honours including 54 titles. UEFA and the SFA do not recognise Rangers as a new club either. Check the UEFA website. LNS in his dual contracts SPL inquiry stated we are not a new club. Neil Patey also. So why do pond life like Thompson wish to perpetuate this lie ? It's something I simply cannot begin to understand but put it down to anti-rangers bigotry which seems acceptable to elements of Scottish society who are almost always the first to accuse Rangers supporters of the most trivial offences whilst overlooking their own actions to the extent they seem to think they are in some way acceptable.
  19. Just thought we might have got a chance to see Telfer if he's that good....
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.