Jump to content

 

 

RANGERRAB

  • Posts

    13,580
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    19

Everything posted by RANGERRAB

  1. We are going round in circles here. if KIng wants control all he has to do is buy a significant shareholding to gain control and there is not a thing the board can do. He wont do that so he wont be investing his 30m or 50m or whatever your figure is I hate to draw this comparison but when the bunnet took over at the east end 20 years ago he had to settle a load of debts their old board built up. That was money he lost before he invested a penny but at least King would be getting shares for his money before he invested your 30m or 50m
  2. Always struck me as a fair and decent man. Unfortunately I cannot say the same thing about the current SFA chief executive who has presided over an absolute shambles of an organisation in which he has allowed one club to have far too great a say in it.
  3. Wont let him invest in a new shares issue ? Did you read King's comments ? Obviously not. He says the financial institutions wont touch a new shares issues so he'll need to become involved.Don't worry your wish will be granted.
  4. Read all of this before. Wants to invest 30m out of 50m. One small problem is there not ? He has to get control of Rangers first either by acquiring existing shares(which he wont do) or by becoming involved in a new rights issue which shouldnt be a problem to him as he says the financial institutions wont want any part in a new rights issue.I'll wait and see how that one pans out. i think I already know the answer
  5. Let him come out now and declare his intentions.Last time he was 'last resort' as he didn't want to invest his kids inheritance. Hold a press conference Dave. tell us what your next move is.Give us a timescale when you hope to acquire Rangers(if that is your intention)
  6. Cant find anything about our chums from the east end and their support for left wing terrorist groups. Thats acceptable to FARE is it? Or is it only right wing groups they oppose?
  7. Not publicly he didn't. Hold a press conference and tell everyone his intentions. No more hearsay
  8. Well let's hear from Mr King. No more grandstanding on the sidelines. Come out publicly(preferably not the BBC or Rhecord) and tell us how much you are prepared to invest in Rangers presumably at the next share issue. No more excuses. You know what you have to do to take control at Rangers. Get on with it or stop this constant circus on the sidelines which I must admit has gone rather quiet lately
  9. To me this yet another non storey from the Daily Rhebel not worthy of discussion
  10. By all accounts there are 40 odd million un-issued Rangers shares. If there is to be another Shares issue why doesn't DK come out publicly and offer to at least underwrite this shares issue or better still offer to buy the whole lot of them. Then we'd at least know he was serious instead of what he's done up until now I.e. rant 'n' rave on the sidelines
  11. And why would they do that? DK has absolutely no intention of becoming involved financially. That is blatantly obvious to me
  12. Couldn't get a game for Dundee HIbs though.
  13. BPH only hold a small percentage shareholding do they not ? They've shown no inclination to increase that shareholding . Is this KEef Jackson trying to create a story where none exists
  14. If we've got Boyd, Miller and Daly next season then rough luck Hertz and HIVS. At least one of them won't be getting promoted - hopefully both....
  15. Best they'll get is second
  16. At the AGM the requisitioners got approx 30 percent of the votes each( far higher than expected). Assuming they've still got that support and if King was to buy a 10 to 20 percent shareholding then the board would be in trouble. The fact that he hasn't bought such a shareholding(and Ive heard the same tired old excuses again and again) tells me all I need to know about him.
  17. And do you think the board will ask him to underwrite another share issue? Would he accept ?
  18. I doubt that very much. Dundee Utd( one of the clubs who claim they don't need Rangers in the top division) have cut their annual wage bill to a mere £1.5m.- total peanuts if you ask me for one of this country's supposedly bigger clubs. I think Boyd would be out of their price range
  19. Well if he's got the wealth you say he has surely he can buy a shareholding which will give him some influence within Rangers. If he increases that shareholding then he'll be in control. There is no other way he can bring about the change you and his army of fans so desperately seem to think he can bring about. Or will the tired old excuse about not lining shareholders pockets be trotted out again?
  20. Agree our finances took a hit in Kaunus but our problems with the bank began when LBG took over HBOS and Fullerton and Kane were in charge of LBG's Scottish business division. Despite the fact that Rangers debt was 3 percent of the MIH debt why were they so fixated on Rangers debt which was falling year on year with AJ as chairman?
  21. Perhaps not as many as a dozen but yes we do need more quality than weve got at present
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.