RANGERRAB
-
Posts
12,962 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
15
Everything posted by RANGERRAB
-
I think this board's future is now dependent on their '120 day business review' which concludes next month. It has to produce a blueprint for the way forward or they're finished in my opinion
-
The BBC can do as they please so long as they receive the outdated licence fee which should be abolished
-
Agree would like ICT win it but cant see it. From what Ive seen of them this season they're not a great side who will deteriorate rapidly with John Hughes now manager
-
Our problem was not bank debt. We have had no bank debt since Whyte took over the oldco & have no bank debt in the newco that I am aware of. Our problem in the oldco was LBG's Scottish business division whilst SDM was still owner i.e. they seemed more concerned about Rangers £18m debt than the £700m MIH debt.Why was that I wonder? Nothing to do with the allegiances of Manus Joseph Fullerton and Archibald Gerrard Kane I'm quite sure........
-
Dk now needs to issue a statement regards his intentions.Will he simply return to SA again without really achieving anything?
-
Is it not the case that Chelsea Pitch Owners owns the freehold to stamford bridge?
-
Derek McInnes extends manager contract
RANGERRAB replied to Waltersgotstyle's topic in General Football Chat
Good luck to Del but I fear his Rangers background will be a problem for him whenever Abergreen get a bad run of results. -
A football club is not a company. The club and company are separate. Thought we'd all had these discussions......
-
I remember before they redeveloped the San GIro they were asking if anyone had any knowledge of mines beneath the ground.Remember too the Whytes and Kellys said they couldn't redevelope the San Giro and started looked at cambuslang and other places to build a new stadium. Then of course the San Giro got redeveloped. Wonder how it mysteriously managed to get over all those issues the Whytes and Kellys had mentioned. do I detect a helping hand from GCC?
-
Neil Lennon’s relaxed about Celtic fans’ conduct
RANGERRAB replied to ian1964's topic in General Football Chat
The club from top to bottom is a problem in this country which no one or no government organisation is prepared to accept responsibility and deal with them. -
Rangers supporters branded him Public Enemy No 1 and his stadium.......
RANGERRAB replied to ian1964's topic in Rangers Chat
He simply could not accept Rangers were the victim of a crime rather than the perpetrator of a crime. All of this will unfold when the police investigations and the Insolvency Service Investigations conclude. Then what will happen Mr Hutton ? -
Murray was forced to sell to Whyte.FACT
-
I'd say the main reason Whyte got rid off Bain was that Bain would have discovered what he was up to and would have turned whistleblower.Mind you I still believe our chum Rhegan knew what was going on and did nothing
-
Due to the positions held by Liewell,Lunny & Rhegan Celt@c effectively run the SFA. They won't take any action against Celt@c as you can see from this which is yet another example of what they'll get away but others(especially us) wouldn't get away with. The game in Scotland is corrupt. No one would dream of sponsoring the domestic football set up.
-
How am I stupid? I asked a simple question.
-
He has previous experience I believe.
-
You haven't answered my question. Who? Name names
-
As you say glad to see the back of MH but who do these people who were against stockbridge, Irvine etc actually want to run Rangers?
-
I say give them their 120 days. After that I'd be prepared to be seek their removal if nothing worthwhile transpires from this review. I have to say however I'm not holding my breath over this review
-
And a manager who is more tactically aware. And one with a gameplan with a plan B to fall back on if plan A isn't working You could go on and on....
-
This board have only been there for months. I think we have to allow this '120 day business review' to be completed. If it produces nothing then serious questions will be asked about their suitability. I stand by my opinion that I don't think fan ownership is financially sustainable. I suspect DK thinks the same
-
My concern about fan ownership (as this article appears to suggest) is whether it is financially sustainable long term. Despite one or two reservations I have about DK I tend to agree with him in his opposition to fan ownership. I believe in the next couple of months we'll be able to get a better idea of whether this board is up to the job or not.
-
And the dugout is where we are sadly lacking at present......
-
Who? Name them
-
Once then 'spivs' have gone who will replace them? Who will be in the boardroom? Can someone answer that please and maybe enlighten us exactly who the 'spivs' are?