Jump to content

 

 

RANGERRAB

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    13,580

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    19

 Content Type 

Everything posted by RANGERRAB

  1. RANGERRAB
    They might need the money if we chase them for damages for voting us out the SPL
  2. RANGERRAB
    Why are Scotland playing games at a club's stadium whose supporters do not support Scotland (at least judging by their supporters flags at every game they don't seem to)
  3. RANGERRAB
    If you had read my earlier posts on this then you'd have read that Hibz parent company went through the same thing in 1991 and the club got transferred to Farmer's newco. They weren't demoted but Rangers were in 2012
  4. RANGERRAB
    We were effectively demoted by being voted out the SPL. I would like those chairmen who took the decision to throw us out the SPL to now come forward and explain why they took that decision. What was that decision based on? who influenced them? I've always thought their decision was based on unproven debts which we now know never existed. Oldco liquidation was brought about by Whyte not paying PAYE/NI. Nothing else. Whyte purchase and subsequent management of Rangers are of course now the centre of more than one police investigation. Unnecessary demotion has cost Rangers tens of millions of pounds when in reality we were victims not perpetrators. The current board should be doing all they can to recover this lost money and if it is to come from these clubs then so be it. Their chairmen took a decision they may live to regret.They should have copied Kilmarnock who abstained. The decision would have been then sent back to Regan's SFA
  5. RANGERRAB
    I do wonder if any of the oldco shareholders will now pursue a claim against the ten clubs who voted Rangers out the SPL (Kilmarnock abstained at the time). What were their reasons for voting us out? It cant be oldco/newco as Hibz did that in 1991 and weren't relegated after their original parent company went bust.. I maintain it was all due to this fictitious EBT tax bill which had now proved to be non existent.There was a belief Rangers owed over £100m and went bust as a result. That has now been proven to be completely wrong.
  6. RANGERRAB
    I just wonder if McCoist is now having doubts about Cammy Bell. I'm just not convinced about Bell at all. He wasn't greatly tested last season but I thought there were one or two worrying signs. For starters he doesn't seem at all convincing when coming for crossballs and doesn't command his box. Better teams will exploit this. Maybe this is why Simonsen has been signed again
  7. RANGERRAB
    One question that needs answered is why the opening ceremony is being held at the San Giro. Normally the opening ceremony would be held at the main athletics arena which in this case is Hampden. Was this just an excuse to spend public money at the San Giro?
  8. RANGERRAB
    Eh? This board weren't around when the oldco got put into a liquidation process(note oldco wouldn't get liquidated for years to come if it happens at all). Why would the current board want Rangers liquidated?
  9. RANGERRAB
    As well as being thrown out the top division
  10. RANGERRAB
    The other issue which needs addressed is why the SPL clubs chose to vote Rangers out of the top division. If you were to ask these club chairmen again today what answers would you get? I'm convinced that they took this decision based on them believing Rangers owed a colossal sum due to EBT's. Now that has been proven not to be the case could these clubs be subjected to legal action? As for the oldco/newco arguement remember Hibz did that in 1991 when their parent company went bust and Farmer transferred the club to a new company and the club carried on. Hibz weren't demoted so that arguement is a non starter too
  11. RANGERRAB
    I await the fall out from this UTTT result with great relish........now for the two bhoys who were at LBG. They're next hopefully
  12. RANGERRAB
    I can assure you Ticketus are not an oldco creditor. Lord Glennie only awarded them 'personal contractual rights' hence their pursuit of Whyte thro the courts down south for fraudulent misrepresentation for which Whyte lost the appeal late last year
  13. RANGERRAB
    Remember these organisations were trying to strip titles. The credibility of both Rhegan and Doncaster is one damaged beyond repair. The UTTT judgement means both must now fall on their sword
  14. RANGERRAB
    Oldco didn't owe Ticketus a penny. They only had personal contractual rights which was why they went after Whyte who lost his appeal against Ticketus for fraudulent misrepresentation at the end of last year
  15. RANGERRAB
    No statement from the SFA? The SPFL?
  16. RANGERRAB
    The big question which must be answered now is just how Whyte managed to get Rangers.I don't believe for one minute SDM willingly sold to Whyte. LBG's involvement in this must be investigated
  17. RANGERRAB
    On holiday abroad at present and missing all this. Must be hilarious watching all the 'tax experts' like Speirs being proven wrong
  18. RANGERRAB
    The oldco didn't fall or jump on its own.I firmly believe it was pushed by an orchestrated plan by individuals of an anti Rangers persuasion with links to politics, banking and of course HMRC. Why would a bank force someone to sell a business to someone then immediately withdraw all credit to that business? What good did that do that business? It was deliberate in an attempt to destroy Rangers along with the EBT tax bill. EBT's were legal tax avoidance whether people like that or not. I firmly believe there will be justice at the end of all this.All roads lead to the other side of the city.I relish the day all of this comes out
  19. RANGERRAB
    Spot on. It was a legacy of the previous regime
  20. RANGERRAB
    Bain the former male model/chef was never suitable or qualified for the CEO position
  21. RANGERRAB
    Both Prior & Laxey bought millions of shares post-AGM.
  22. RANGERRAB
    Prior owns about 2.5 percent of Rangers and Laxey own just over 11 percent do they not?
  23. RANGERRAB
    Laxey and Prior bought a damn sight more than a few thousand.
  24. RANGERRAB
    No idea. But Laxey & Prior managed to buy shares since the AGM last year
  25. RANGERRAB
    Existing shareholders or becomes involved in new share issue later this year
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.