Jump to content

 

 

RANGERRAB

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    13,582

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    19

 Content Type 

Everything posted by RANGERRAB

  1. RANGERRAB
    Only one of these two can be taken seriously.......
  2. RANGERRAB
    ????? I can assure you I do understand the legislation. the players were perfectly entitled to go by not transferring across. Had they done so then I believe they could have left on better terms. You do not seem to be able to understand this from what I wrote do you ? Read again
  3. RANGERRAB
    And who will buy 'at the right price' do you think? Not too many buyers out there I wouldn't have thought
  4. RANGERRAB
    The circumstances we found ourselves in two years ago were unprecedented. The existence of Rangers was at stake.These players were going. No doubt about that. But could they not have left in a better way than they did? Bocanegra did and still has the respect and admiration of everyone to this day. Why couldn't they?
  5. RANGERRAB
    And who will replace them?
  6. RANGERRAB
    Hate to say it but we'll fare no better than any of the Scottish sides did this week when we're back in Europe unless the quality of player in our first team squad improves dramatically between now & then
  7. RANGERRAB
    There was no way Whittaker, Naismith, Lafferty etc could have stayed after newco was formed.Their wages were prohibitive to them doing so.However the very least they could have done was TUPE over so the club could have got a fee for each of them albeit a very nominal fee.That way none of them would have left with the bad feeling which still does exist amongst a sizeable section of our support. What I would like Naismith & Whittaker to do though is to tell us what legal advice they got from Wishart's players union and it's legal chum Ms Margaret Gribbon. Seeing the two of them at that press conference saying they didn't want to play for Sevco has always made me deeply suspicious of the legal advice they got. If they really do want to attempt to build bridges with the Rangers support then I believe they should be doing this for starters. Some of us may never forgive them and that is something they will need to live with unfortunately
  8. RANGERRAB
    What other rumours?
  9. RANGERRAB
    d'art - just when will the 'anonymous operator' of the rangers tax blog be revealed? Surely he must be known to the police and why is it taking so long to bring him to justice
  10. RANGERRAB
    Only if he gets decent service from MF.
  11. RANGERRAB
    We seem to be struggling to score goals just like for spells last season. Worrying.
  12. RANGERRAB
    ' Peter's wealth of experience ' LOL they're having' a laugh now aren't they? What's Liewell ever done for the benefit of Scottish football ? He's only there to look after Shelliks interests. Nothing else. We've a derisory TV deal which he and Dumbcaster signed a couple of years ago and the SPFL still cannot get a sponsor. The professional game in this country is on it's deathbed and desperately needs injections of finance from somewhere. It's time for club chairmen to wake up and start asking the SFA and SPFL proper questions about where the game in this country is heading. Let's start the ball rolling please Mr Somers.....
  13. RANGERRAB
    Does anyone have a realistic solution to the apparent financial shortfall ?
  14. RANGERRAB
    Was it not the case this money never touched Rangers' account. How could it be Rangers Ticketus money?
  15. RANGERRAB
    Who is Mr Fitzpatrick?
  16. RANGERRAB
    There are police investigations ongoing regards Whyte's purchase and subsequent management of Rangers. LBG will undoubtedly have been part of those investigations. Don't forget too that they've still got Whyte's ticketus money which he obtained by 'fraudulent misreprestnation'. It is essentially the proceeds of crime
  17. RANGERRAB
    And the mhedia dare not report that fact as well. What a strange country we now live in......
  18. RANGERRAB
    He said he was a 'last resort' as it was his kids inheritence. If there really is a second share issue in September then Mr King return....
  19. RANGERRAB
    Running costs are too high. Cuts need to be made. No matter where these cuts were made the SoS, UoF etc would then start calling the board fraudsters, asset-strippers etc.
  20. RANGERRAB
    Well if, according to the UoF, there,s to be a second share issue(as early as September?) then let Mr Dave King (and whoever else) come out and openly challenge the board that he is prepared to underwrite this share issue.
  21. RANGERRAB
    Correct me if I'm wrong but if the board wish to have a 2nd share issue and current shareholders do not take up their allocation then the board can then offer those shares to other investors???? Surely then the likes of DaveKing with his 50million would be welcomed with open arms?
  22. RANGERRAB
    No pressure on Ally is there ?????
  23. RANGERRAB
    Hopefully we can get the SFA to make a special case for us to get into the EL next season
  24. RANGERRAB
    Perhaps due to more games being televised viewing figures increased? Forget the viewing figures. The deal Dumbcaster and Liewell signed two years ago after we got voted out the SPL is worth peanuts. All other similar-sized countries to ours have far better deals in comparison.The brain dead chairmen in this country need to realise this
  25. RANGERRAB
    I doubt it was that simple. Were no checks done on Whyte by Ticketus or whoever? It's a helluva lot of money for what turned out to be unsecured loans?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.