RANGERRAB
-
Posts
12,962 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
15
Everything posted by RANGERRAB
-
David Somers buys 35,000 shares + Easdale buys more shares
RANGERRAB replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
It was a sarcastic reference to DK & his merryband -
Doubt very much if McCoist(or whoever is manager next season) will be allowed to sign players with no resale value again
-
Big, big difference between an empty hoose and carpark being used to secure funding and the stadium & MP. If you can't realise that then..............well I don't know
-
David Somers buys 35,000 shares + Easdale buys more shares
RANGERRAB replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
Buying shares in the company. Wonder if the noisy hecklers and bystanders will do likewise -
Not a chance directors would hand over such an asset to a third party. Dream on............ They've a legal responsibility to protect company's assets
-
Little leaves while Hegarty and Perry told to find new clubs
RANGERRAB replied to ian1964's topic in Rangers Chat
YES is the short answer to that one -
oh dear the SoS &UoF won't like that
-
YAWN..........here we go again............if he really did have this 50million(GBP I presume) the board would be gone in an instant
-
FWIW I am extremely suspicious of Fullerton. All I want to know is whether he(as head of LBG's Scottish business banking division at the time) had any input in the ridiculous sale by SDM to CW. Knowing where is football allegiances are did that influence things because CW was a car crash waiting to happen as the then Rangers chairmen AJ stated vociferously at the time. SKY business editor Jeff Randall too. Perhaps the ongoing police investigations & the Insolvency Service investigation will provide us with all we need to know
-
And this is, of course, the gameplan by the UoF, SoS etc to try and make out the club is being robbed by its owners without any actual documentary evidence. Oh and I nearly forgot.........to replace the board with the Murrays & DK without investing a penny of their own money.
-
the product on the park needs to be improved though or people won't turn up to watch.
-
how much would it cost? it's not as if he's got a job for life is it? so what you're saying is we're stuck with him until he decides he wants to go ? when will that be? the man's deluded. He's a rank rotten manager who'd never get another job anywhere else
-
and how much money have they taken ? must be in the accounts is it not?
-
get shot off Ally and ST sales will increase
-
FWIW I'm not the board's greatest admirer either but until there's a viable alternative we're stuck with what we've got. I don't believe there will be any meaningful investment until we're back in the top division & playing in Europe. I don't believe DK & the Murrays double act represent a viable alternative which is a forlorn hope a lot of supporters are clinging to
-
you go ahead. Just be careful there's still a club to support at the end of this if your dangerous ideas & beliefs ever come to fruition. Could you explain what you mean with money 'shared' between their interests and the club ?? what does that mean ??
-
You're not still buying into that 50million stuff are you GS? Load of tosh IMO. The man has no intention of investing his kids' inheritance. Get over it. BTW when you talk of DK's wealth in 'millions' is that GBP or SA Rand ?
-
Apart from going out of business altogether and the club having to reform in the amateur or junior leagues of Scottish football no there is little alternative. No Craig Whyte excuse this time when the SFA were obliged to transfer membership and the club continued under a newco.
-
Who will it be after the Easdales then if they up & go despite the fact they've actually put their own money into Rangers ? Let's face it this is all about getting DK & the Murrays replacing the current board without putting in a single penny. But the majority of the shareholders don't want them as per the AGM before Christmas. So they're resorting to these sort of tactics which could have dire consequences for Rangers believe me. The shareholders own Rangers and that's how a plc operates. If they (UoF, SoS etc) can't understand that or won't accept that we have problems. Big problems. FWIW I don't believe DK is anywhere near as wealthy as he's made out to be. His wealth is measured in tens of millions and that's his kids' inheritance which he's reluctant to give away
-
Complaining about Hamilton beating Morton 10-2 and calling Morton 'unprofessional' I believe because they lost 10 goals as it could have affected Dundee had they not beaten Dumbarton. Yet if my memory serves me correctly was Hartley not part of an Abergreen side which lost nine goals at the San Giro? Pot, Kettle black Paul?
-
big difference between them and ibrox & MP.
-
The board cannot possibly handover company assets to a third party. They'd get removed by the shareholders(who own the company) and be replaced by another board. What they want to do(provided the board hand over ibrox & MP as security which they won't) is collect ST monies mid july and then give the money to the club but if the board say no they won't collect any money....................
-
TAKEN FROM WEBSITE FAQ's 'You are giving a mandate to Ibrox 1972 Ltd to collect and pass on your season ticket money to the club in the event that they grant security over Ibrox. If they do not agree then no money will be collected and the instruction will be cancelled on 8th August 2014 or shortly thereafter' Can someone explain to me this whole point in all of this if the board tell them where to go(as they will) regarding granting security of ibrox & MP ?
-
Lemon's signings since we left the top division have generally been a disaster. Puki? Balde ? Borigter ? Ambrose is no standout either and I see they're trying to flog big clumsy Van Dyke for £8m. How can his value treble playing one season in the SPL, sorry SPFL Premiership(or whatever it's called).
-
Be interesting to see if McCoist is allowed to sign 30 years old plus players with no resale value. Mather allowed him to. Perhaps Wallace may think otherwise