Jump to content

 

 

RANGERRAB

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    13,582

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    19

 Content Type 

Everything posted by RANGERRAB

  1. RANGERRAB
    In a word YES I would until it is affordable again. Too few of the first team squad come thro the youth ranks to justify throwing vast amounts of money at it. It's been that way for decades now and isn't likely to change anytime soon
  2. RANGERRAB
    Yes but is MP cost effective? Again I ask how much does it cost to run annually?
  3. RANGERRAB
    Rumours? What sort of maintenance problem are you talking about? Surely not that asbestos nonsense again
  4. RANGERRAB
    Sell MP and build something less expensive for first team squad only.
  5. RANGERRAB
    What are the annual running costs of MP? Are these costs justified given It's only main purpose is for first team training as it produces so few youngsters for the first team
  6. RANGERRAB
    The thing is Craig, it ain't performing too well is it? It should be producing, in my opinion at least a couple of players each season to go into the first team squad. it isn't. We've recently put seven young players out on loan to get first team experience else where.It'll be interesting to how many of them return and get into the first team squad. Finally I'd say we need to know how much this failing youth set up costs per annum at MP. well into millions I'd say.Money we simply don't have to waste on a youth set up which isn't performing
  7. RANGERRAB
    We never cut costs whilst in lower leagues.We should have operated with a first team squad only and no costly youth set ups etc at MP. Add to that some of the ridiculous salaries paid out (800k p.a. to Ally McCoist in SFL3) then it's no surprise we ended in trouble again. Until we have someone as CEO prepared to take these decisions we will go nowhere
  8. RANGERRAB
  9. RANGERRAB
    Who recruited Wallace? ,
  10. RANGERRAB
    Does he know what's right? He should have begun cutting costs long ago. It even seems to be he is either unwilling or unable to do this
  11. RANGERRAB
    Well he should stop giving the impression via his pals such as SOS, UoF etc that he is desperate to put money into Rangers but is being prevented from doing so.That simply isn't true. SE said the other day in that interview he'd never offered £30m. Make of that what you wish.
  12. RANGERRAB
    DK really has disappeared has he not? Or is he 'working away in the background ? I do not believe he will be our saviour
  13. RANGERRAB
    I was reading the Daily Mail the other day and Simon Heffer described Obama as 'long on analysis,short on action'. A perfect analysis of Dave King too I thought
  14. RANGERRAB
    No I cant
  15. RANGERRAB
    So if the reqs had got,say, 55 percent of the votes at the AGM and the board got the remaining 45 percent the reqs would still be unable to get places on the board?
  16. RANGERRAB
    I believe the one pound was for exclusivity I.e. Rangers couldn't go elsewhere and negotiate a deal with another company and rename the stadium. It certainly didn't mean it could be renamed the Sports Direct Arena(or something similar) and Rangers got £1. But hey never mind let's just twist the story to make things look as bad as we can eh?
  17. RANGERRAB
    Rangers supporters, players, directors etc should NOT under any circumstances be doing interviews with the anti-rangers DR. Do they not know the background of the pond life employed at that rhag?
  18. RANGERRAB
    The idea that Ibrox would get renamed the Sports Direct Arena(or something similar) and Rangers would get nothing is ridiculous. Also do you know the terms of the retail contract to Sports Direct?
  19. RANGERRAB
    I keep hearing SDM's name being mentioned.
  20. RANGERRAB
    I'd like to see the details of these 'onerous contracts' which keep getting referred to
  21. RANGERRAB
    At the last AGM the reqs got 30 percent of the vote. I was amazed at how high they got. Why couldn't King(or someone) have acquired 20 percent shareholding? They'd certainly be able to influence the club then would they not?
  22. RANGERRAB
    Are you paying the slightest bit of attention to what I wrote ? If King bought a shareholding then he'd get influence and be able to begin to put an end to this sort of thing.It wouldn't happen overnight though butif King is as wealthy as his supporters make out what's stopping him?
  23. RANGERRAB
    What I found interesting in court today was the statement by Rangers QC that talks were at an advanced stage with two potential investors. Who could they be I wonder? And what are the chances of much-needed investment?
  24. RANGERRAB
    I may be wrong but I thought we needed three years of RIFC plc audited accounts before we could get back into Europe.I don't think we've got three years yet have we? The only way around this was if the SFA made a special application on our behalf which had to be at the start of the season meaning they'd have had to have done it prior to this season starting
  25. RANGERRAB
    £1.2million in the bank is bad news indeed.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.